Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2010.38.6.561

Bioethanol Production Using By-product of VPP (Value Prior to Pulping)  

Lee, Jae-Won (Department of Forest Products and Technology (BK 21 Program), Chonnam National University)
Kim, Hye-Yun (Department of Environmental Material Science, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Jeffries, Thomas W. (Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchod Drive)
Choi, In-Gyu (Department of Environmental Material Science, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology / v.38, no.6, 2010 , pp. 561-567 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated optimal conditions for ethanol production of the spruce hydrolysate (SH) obtained from diethyl oxalate pretreatment. Fermentable sugar concentration in SH was 29.04 g/${\ell}$ except arabinose. Monosaccharides obtained from the oligomer degradation were mainly mannose (39.26 g/${\ell}$) and galactose (12.83 g/${\ell}$). Concentration of 5-HMF and furfural which are inhibitors on ethanol fermentation were 0.09 g/${\ell}$ and 0.04 g/${\ell}$ respectively. Concentration of acetic acid and total phenolic compounds in SH were 1.4 g/${\ell}$ and 2.83 g/${\ell}$. Ethanol production using hydrolysate was 11.7 g/${\ell}$ at optimal pH 6.0 after 48 h. Specific ethanol production was 0.15 (g/(${\ell}^*h$)) at pH 5.0 and 5.5. while that was 0.24 (g/(${\ell}^*h$)) at pH 6.0. Specific ethanol production has difference depend on initial pH for fermentation. Ethanol production was 14.3 g/${\ell}$ after 48 h when xylanase 20 IU was added in SH for degradation of oligomer during fermentation. It implied that ethanol production increased by 22.2% compare with control (without xylanase).
Keywords
diethyl oxalate pretreatment; spruce hydrolysate; ethanol fermentation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kenealy, W. R., C. J. Houtman, J. Laplaza, T. W. Jeffries, and E. G. Horn. 2006. Pretreatment for converting wood into paper and chemicals. In: Materials, Chemicals and Energy from Forest Biomass. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 954. Ed Argyropoulos, D.S. ACS, Washington, D.C.
2 Kenealy, W., E. Horn, M. Davis, R. Swaney, and C. Houtman. 2007. Vapor-phase diethyl oxalate pretreatment of wood chips: Part 2. Release of hem-icellulose carlwhydrates. Holzforschung. 61: 230-235.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Larsson, S., E. Palmqvist, B. Hahn-Hagerdal, C. Tengborng, K. Stenberg, G. Zacchi, and N. Nilverbrant. 1999. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 24: 151-159.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Nigam, J. N. 2001. Ethanol production from wheat straw hemicellulose hydrolysate by Pichia stipitis. J. Biotechnol 87: 17-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Olivia, J. M., M. J. Negro, F. Saez. I. Ballesteros, P. Manzanares, A. Gonzalez, and M. Ballesteros. 2006. Effects of acetic acid, fufural and catechol combinations on ethanol fermentation of Kluyvro-myces marxianus. Process Biochem 41:1223-1228.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Palm, M. and Z. Guido. 2003. Extraction of hemi-cellulose oligosaccharides from spruce using microwave oven or stream treatment. Biomacro-molecules 4: 617-623.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Palmqvist, E. and B. Hahn-Hagerdal. 2000. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour. Technol. 74:17-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Clark, T. and K. L. Mackie 1984. Fermentalion in-gibitors in wood hydrolysates derived from the softwood Pinus radiate. J. Chem. Biotechnol. 34: 101-110.
9 Delgenes, J. P., R. Moletta, and J. M. Navarro. 1996. Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomoiias mobilis, Pichia stipilis, and Candida shehalae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 19: 220-225.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Haagensen, F, V. I. Skiadas, H. N. Gavala, and B. K. Ahring. 2009. Pre-treatment and ethanol fermentation potential of olive pulp at different dry matter concentrations. Biomass and Bioenergy 33:1643-1651.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Heer, D. and U. Sauer. 2008. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbial Biotechnology 1(6): 497-506.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Scalbert, A., B. Monties, and G. Janin 1989. Tannins in wood: comparison of different estimateion methods. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 37(5): 1324-1329.   DOI
13 Palmqvist, E., H. Grage, N. Q. Meinander, and B. Hahn-Hagerdal. 1999. Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, fufural, p-hydroxybenzoin acid on growth and ethanol procution of yeasts. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 63: 46-55.   DOI
14 Raymond, D. and G. Closset. 2004. Forest products biorefinery: technology for a new future. Solutions! 87: 49-53.
15 Sasner, P., M. Galbe, and G. Zacchi. 2008. Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different Ignocellulosic materials. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 422-430.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wingre. A., M. Galbe, and G. Zacchi. 2008. Energy consideration for a SSF-based softwood ethanol plant. Bioresource Technology 99: 222-231.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Slininger, P. J., R.J. Bothast, M. R. Ladisch, and M. R. Okos. 1990. Optimum pH and temperature conditions for xylose fermentation by Pichia stipitis. Bioresour. Technol. 35: 727-731.
18 Soderstrom, J., L. Pilcher, M. Galbe, and G. Zacchi. 2003. Combined use of $H_2SO_4$ and $SO_2$ impregnation for steam pretreatment of spruce in ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105-108: 127-140.
19 Thorp, B. and D. Raymond 2004. Forest biorefinery could open the door to bright future for P & P industry. Paper Age. 120: 16-18.
20 Jacobs, A., J. Lundqvist, H. Stablbrand, F. Tjerneld, and O. Dahlman. 2002. Characterization of water-soluble hemicellulose from spruce and aspen employing SEM/MALDI mass spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 37: 711-717.
21 Jensen, J. R., J. E. Morinelly, K. R. Gossen, M. J. Brodeur-Campbell, and D. R. Shonnard 2010. Effects of dilute acid pretreatment conditioas on enzymatic hydrolysis monomer and oligomer sugar yields for aspen, balsam, and switchgrass. Bioresour. Technol. 101: 2317-2325.   DOI   ScienceOn