Browse > Article

Anatomical Characteristics of Kenaf Grown in Reclaimed Land(I)-Differences in Phloem and Xylem with Growth Period and Height-  

Lee, Seon-Hwa (College of Forest & Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Se-na (College of Forest & Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Kwon, Sung-Min (College of Forest & Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Myoung-Ku (College of Forest & Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Cho, Dong-Ha (College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Nam-Hun (College of Forest & Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology / v.35, no.6, 2007 , pp. 43-49 More about this Journal
Abstract
Anatomical properties of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) planted in a reclaimed-land of Korea were examined to understand the growth characteristics by an optical and scanning electron microscopy. The samples of kenaf were taken from four positions of the stem (3, 35, 70, 105 cm above from the ground) in four growth periods (July. August, September, October) from seeding planted in the middle of May. Bast fiber, phloem rays, cortex parenchyma cells and sieve tube members were observed in phloem, and vessel elements, fibers and rays in xylem. Solitary and multiple radial pores existed in xylem. The cell types of ray parenchyma in radial section were procumbent, upright, and square. The intervascular pitting showed an alternate type. Xylem proportion, the number of bast fibers and dimension of phloem rays increased with increasing growth period, and decreased with increasing stem height. The proportion of multiseriate rays was higher than that of uniseriate and biseriate rays in xylem with increasing growth period. On the other hand, The proportion of multiseriate rays was lower than that of uniseriate and biseriate rays in xylem with increasing stem height.
Keywords
Kenaf; Hibiscus cannabinus; scanning electron microscope; bast fiber; phloem ray;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ching, A., C. L. Webber III, and S. W. Neill. 1993. Effect of location and cultivar on kenaf yield components. industr. Crops Products. 1: 191-196
2 Voulgaridis, E., C. Passialis, and A. Grigoriou. 2000. Anatomical characteristics and property of kenaf stems (Hibiscus cannabinus). lAWA Journal. 21(4): 435-442
3 조남석, 최태호. 1996. 속성섬유자원인 양마로부터 전동 한지제조특성. 한국펄프.종이공학, 펄프.종이기술 28(4): 7-16
4 박상진, 이종윤, 조남석, 조병묵. 1993. 목재과학실험서 (물리.공학.화학편). pp. 49-53
5 조남기, 송창길, 강봉균, 조영일, 고지병. 2001. 제주지역에서 재식밀도에 따른양마의 생육특성, 수량 및 조성분 변화. 동물자원지 43(5): 755 - 762
6 이명구, 윤승락. 2003. 국내산 케나프 이용에 관한 연구 (제1보) 국내에서 재배한 케나프의 생장 및 해부학적 특성. 한국펄프.종이 공학, 펄프.종이기술. 34(4):68-74
7 Lewin, M and E. M. Pearce. 1998. Handbook of fiber chemistry. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1: 465-502
8 Ayezra, R. (h) and W. Coates. 1996. Kenaf performance in northwestem Argentina. Industr.Crops Products. 5: 223-228   DOI   ScienceOn
9 권영만, 황원중, 권성민, 조준형, 이명구, 김남훈 .2005. 국내에서 생장한 케나프의 해부학적 특성. 산림과학연구. 21: 98-103
10 유혜자, 이혜자, 김정희, 안춘순, 송경헌, 한영숙 2006. 화학처리에 의한 케나프 섬유의 물리적 특성의 변화. 한국의류학회지. 30(7): 1025-1033   과학기술학회마을
11 Ramaswamy, G. N., B. Soeharto, C. R. Boyd., and B. S. Baldwin. 1999. Forest kill and kenaf fiber quality. Industr. Crops Products. 19: 189-195
12 류승원, 주은영, 김성무, 김병완, 조동하. 2006 철원지역에서 Kenaf 품종들의 재배 생리적 특성. 공동춘계학술발표회. 한국작물학회. 한국작물학회지. pp. 280-281
13 산림청. 2005. 임업통계연보. 제35권 pp.281-287
14 Mambelli, S. and S. Grandi. 1995. Yields, and quality of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) stem as affected by harvest date and irrigation. Industr. Crops Products. 4: 97 -104   DOI   ScienceOn
15 김희태, 박찬호, 손세호. 1989. 공예작물학. 향문사. pp.97-105
16 김남훈, 황원중, 권구중, 권성민, 이명구, 조준형. 2006. 국내에서 생장한 Kenaf (양마)의 해부 및 물리적 특성. 목재공학 34(3): 1-7
17 강시용, 김판기, 유장걸. 2001. 케나프 품종의 생육 및 광합성 특성. 한국작물학회 심포지엄 및 학술발표회. pp. 214-215
18 Manzanares, M, J. L. Tenorio., P. Manznares, and L. Ayerbe. 1993. Yield and development of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) crop in ration to water supply and intercepted radiation Biomass and Bioenergy. 5: 337 - 345   DOI   ScienceOn