Browse > Article

Biomass Energy in the USA: A Literature Review (II) - Marketing and Policies for Green Power Production with Environmental Attributes -  

Kim, Yeong-Suk (Dept. of Forest Products, College of Forst Science, Kookmin University)
Gorman, Thomas (Dept. of Forests, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology / v.33, no.1, 2005 , pp. 97-110 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper is the second part of a literature review describing the current status of biomass energy use in the USA. The bioenergy technologies that convert biomass resources to a form of energy were presented, in particular focused on existing coal fired boiler, high efficiency gasification combined cycle. We presented latest biomass power energy supply, economic issues such as its production and plant investment cost in the Part I. In the Part II, our review summarized policy and market issues for electricity consumers, benefits from biomass power which could offer an alternative to conventional energy sources in the form of environmental, rural economic growth, and national energy security in the USA.
Keywords
energy; bioenergy technology; bioenergy policy; green power (biomass power);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김영숙, 2004. 미국 에너지 시장에 공납되는 바이오에너지에 관한 연구(I)- 바이오매스 전기 생산 및 제조 기술에 대하여-. 산림과학. 제16집, 71-88
2 Aabakken J. and W. Short, 2003. Domestic Energy Scenarios, NREL/TP-620-32742
3 Bain, R. L., R. P. Overend, and K. R. Craig. 1996 Biomass-fired Power generation, Conference Paper: 'Biomass Usage for Utility and Industrial Power, Engineering Foundation, NY. NY
4 Bird, Lori and Blair Swezey. 2003. Green Power Marketing in the United States: A Status Report (6th), NREL/TP-620-35119
5 U.S. Department of Energy. 2003. http://www. eere.energy.gov
6 World Resources Institute. 2003. Renewable Energy Certificates: An Attractive Means for Corporate Customers to Purchase Renewable Energy, http://www.wri.org
7 Bergman, R. 2003. Small Timber products and Markets Outlook: A focus on Wood Energy, Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service. Http://www. fpl.fs.fed.us
8 International Energy Agency. 2002. Renewable in Gloval Energy Supply, http://www.iea.org
9 Bain, Richard. t , Wade A. Amos., Mark Downing and Robert L. Perlack. 2003. Highlights of the Biopower Technical Assessment, State of the Industry and the technology, NREL/TP-51O-33502
10 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energe. 2003c Green Power Network, http://www.eere.energy gov
11 Fedetal Energy Management Program. 2003. Western Area Power Adminostration Unveils Federal Green Power Purchasing Program, FEMP News and Events, Nov. 11
12 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energe. 2003d. Competitive Electricity Markets, http://www. eere.energy.gov
13 Etra, Daniel. 200,'S. Powerful Choices IV: A Survey of Retail Green Power Programs in the Pacific Northwest, Renewable Northwest Project, http:// www.RNP.org
14 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energe. 2003f Bioenergy Feedstock Development Program, http://www.eere.energy.gov
15 Etra, Daniel. 2003. Powerful Choices IV: A Survey of Retail Green Power Programs in the Pacific Northwest, Renewable Northwest Project, http://www.RNP.org
16 Overend, Ralph P. and Richard L. Bain. 2003 Technical Support of the U.S. DOE Biomass Power Program in the Development of Biomass to Electricity technology, 210th ACS Meeting Fuel Division Paper, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
17 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energe. 2003b. Utilities Offering Green Pricing Programs, http:// www.eere.energy.gov
18 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energe. 2003a. Renewable Energy Technologies, http://www.eere.energy.gov
19 Temperate Forest Foundation. 2003. Biomass for Energy and Forest Fuel Reduction, Eco-Link Vol. 13, No.3, Temperate Forest Foundation
20 Bain, Richard. L., Wade A. Amos., Mark Downing and Robert L. Perlack. 2003. Highlights of the Bio-power Technical Assessment, State of the Industry and the technology, NREL/TP-51O-33502
21 Graham, R. L. and M. E. Walsh. 1995. Evaluating the Economic Costs, Benefits and Traeoffs of Dedicated Biomass Energy Systems: The Importance of Scale, The Proceedings, Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy, Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, 207 - 215 National Renewable Energy Laboratory
22 Mann Margaret K. and Pamela L. Spath. 2003. A Comparison of the Environmental Consequences of Power from Biomass, Coal and Natural gas, Natinal Renewable energy Laboratory
23 Morris, G. 2000. Biomass Energy Production Inb California: The Case for a Biomass Policy Intiative: Final Report, NREL/SR-570-28805, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
24 National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2003. Biomass Power Research
25 Oregon Department of Energy, 2003. Oregon Incentives, http://www.energy.state.or.us
26 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energe. 2003e Green Power Policies, http://www.eere.energy gov
27 Energy Information Administration. 2002. An- nual Energy Out look 2002, DOE/EIA-0383
28 Graham, R. L., D. D. Huff, M. R. Kaufmann, W. D Shepperd, and J. Sheehan. 1998. Bioevergy and Watershed Restoration in the Mountainous regions of the West:What are the Environmental/ Community Issue?, Bioenergy '98, Expanding Bioenergy Partnerships, Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory http:// www.thegreenpowergroup.org
29 Bird, Lori and Blair Swezey. 2003. Estimates of Renewable Energy Capacity Serving Green Power Markets in the United States: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, http://www.eere energy.gov