Browse > Article

Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Distal Femoral Fracture in Elderly Patient Group  

Park, Hee-Gon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University, School of Medicine)
Kim, Yeon-Jun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University, School of Medicine)
Jang, Ho-Seong (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University, School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Trauma and Injury / v.26, no.4, 2013 , pp. 286-290 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To report the postoperative Clinical and Radiological outcomes following distal femoral fractures in elderly patients compared with young patients. Methods: From March, 1996 to March, 2012, 83 patients who received surgical treatment for fractures of the distal femur were enrolled in this retrospective study. Ages more than 65 was named group A. Group A was 49 cases and mean age is 72.5 year(65~91year). Group B was 49 cases and mean age is 45.7 year(16~61 year). Surgical methods are retrograde IM nail, locking compression plate, cannulated screw and postoperative rehabilitation is no difference between two groups. Clinical results were evaluated using Neer scores, radiographic results and the presence of clinical complications. Results: The mean union period was 18.4(12-40) weeks in group A and 17(10-24) weeks in group B. Neer functional scores are no significant statistical difference between two groups. There are 5 cases metal breakage in group A and 1case in group B. There are 3 cases nonunion in group A and 1 case in group B. Conclusion: In the case of fractures of the distal femur in elderly patients, locking plate using minimally invasive percutaneous periosteal osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique may be one of the most effective methods and preoperative bone stock evaluation in important.
Keywords
Distal Femur Fracture; Elderly; Retrograde; Locking plate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Grass R, Biewener A, Rammelt S, Zwipp H. Die retrograde Verriegelungsnagelosteosynthese distaler Femurfrakturen mit dem distalen Femurnagel DFN. Unfallchirurg 2002; 105: 298- 314.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Koval KJ, Kummer FJ, Bharam S, Chen D, Halder S. Distal femoral fixation: a laboratory comparison of the 95 degrees plate, antegrade and retrograde inserted reamed intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 1996; 10: 378-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Meyer RW, Plaxton NA, Postak PD, Gilmore A, Froimson MI, Greenwald AS. Mechanical comparison of a distal femoral side plate and a retrograde intramedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14: 398-404.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 494-502.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Schandelmaier P, Farouk O, Krettek C, Mannss J, Tscherne H. Biomechanik von Femurverriegelungsmarknageln im Knochen-Implantat-Verbund. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1997; 382: 167-72.
6 Schutz M, Muller M, Krettek C, Hontzsch D, Regazzoni P, Ganz R et al. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 2001; 32 Suppl 3: SC48-54.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Nieves JW, Bilezikian JP, Lane JM, Einhorn TA, Wang Y, Steinbuch M et al. Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int. 2010; 21: 399.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Arneson TJ, Melton 3rd LJ, Lewallen DG, O'Fallon WM. Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 188-94.
9 Bell KM, Johnstone AJ, Court-Brown CM, Hughes SP. Primary knee arthroplasty for distal femoral fractures in elderly patients. Journal of Bone & Joint SurgeryDBritish Volume 1992; 74(3): 398-402.   DOI
10 Shewring DJ, Meggitt BF. Fractures of the distal femur treated with the AO dynamic condylar screw. Journal of Bone & Joint SurgeryDBritish Volume 1992; 74(1): 117-27.
11 Man-Kwan Wong, Frankie Leung, Shew Ping Chow. Treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly using a less-invasive plating technique. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 2005; 29: 117-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Schatzker J, Lambert DC. Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clinical Orthopaedics 1979; 138: 77.
13 Abdel-Rahman EL-GANAINY, Adham ELGEIDI. Treatment of distal femoral fractures in elderly diabetic patients using minimally invasive percutaneous plating osteosynthesis (MIPPO). Acta Orthop. Belg., 2010; 76: 503-6.
14 Strømsøe K. Fracture fixation problems in osteoporosis. Injury 2004; 35: 107-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury 2001; 32 Suppl 3: SC32-47.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Whittle AP. Fractures of the lower extremity. In : Canale ST, Beatty JH, eds. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa; 2007, chap 51.
17 Dirk Wahnert, Konrad Hoffmeier, Rosemarie Frober, Gnther O. Hofmann, Thomas Muckley. Distal femur fractures of the elderly-Different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury 2011; 42; 655-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 David SM, Harrow ME, Peindl RD, et al. Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 344-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Firoozbakhsh K, Behzadi K, DeCoster TA, Moneim MS, Naraghi FF. Mechanics of retrograde nail versus plate fixation for supracondylar femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9: 152-7.   DOI   ScienceOn