Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15266/KEREA.2022.31.4.777

Reinforcement of Refrigerant Gas Regulations in EU and Implications for Carbon Neutrality  

Dong Koo Kim (Major in Economics, Division of Maritime Management and Economics, National Korea Maritime & Ocean University)
Publication Information
Environmental and Resource Economics Review / v.31, no.4, 2022 , pp. 777-799 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examined the latest EU regulatory strengthening trends for refrigerant gases with very large global warming potential (GWP) and derived implications for carbon neutrality. The European Commission recently unveiled an amendment that significantly strengthens the F-gas Regulation. This study presented the meaning of the main contents related to refrigerants in the amendment by comparing them with the current regulations. The main contents of the amendment include drastically reducing the maximum amount of HFCs that can be placed on the market, strengthening regulations related to HFCs allocation, adding products and equipment that use high GWP refrigerants, adding regulated F-gas and updating the GWP of existing gases, and other stricter regulatory designs. This movement of the EU will affect the policy stance of advanced countries such as the United States and Japan, and Korea's policy will also be further strengthened. Therefore, it will be inevitable for related industries to change to next-generation refrigerant gas. Meanwhile, this study also analyzed the latest policy trends related to per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS) regulation, which were not noted in previsou studies on refrigerants and F-gas. If PFAS's registration of REACH restricted substances, which are being promoted by five European countries, is made, it will have a very big impact on the industry regarding refrigerant gas. In addition, it will be inevitable to thoroughly review each country's greenhouse gas reduction strategies related to F-gas materials, including refrigerants.
Keywords
Refrigerant; F-gas; Greenhouse gas; Carbon neutrality; Climate change;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 2050 탄소중립녹색성장위원회, "윤 정부, 탄소중립.녹색성장 비전과 추진전략 발표", 보도자료 2022.10.26., 2022.
2 고영환.오세기.김병순, "신냉매 개발 현황 및 규격 동향", 대한설비공학회 2019 하계학술발표대회 논문집, 2019, pp. 677~681.
3 국가기술표준원.한국전자정보통신산업진흥회, "EU 과불화화합물 규제", 무역기술장벽 (TBT) 규제동향 보고서, 2021.
4 김민주.김동구, "EU 'Fit for 55' 패키지 초안의 주요 내용", 세계 에너지시장 인사이트, 제 21-15호, 2021.7.26., 에너지경제연구원, 2021.
5 명소영.장완복.유시리.엄태인, "국내 냉매관리제도 개선방안 연구 -해외 냉매관리 법적규제 및 감축정책을 중심으로-", 「한국폐기물자원순환학회지」, 제32권 제2호, 2015a, pp. 191~199.
6 명소영.장완복.유시리.엄태인, "국내 냉매관리제도 개선방안 연구 -냉매 생산.사용.폐기 단계별 분석을 중심으로-", 「한국폐기물자원순환학회지」, 제32권 제4호, 2015b, pp. 368~377.
7 문미라.김민철, "불소계 온실가스 감축을 위한 냉매관리 개선방안 연구", 「인문사회21」, 제 12권 제2호, 2021, pp.1127~1136.
8 문미라.김요섭.윤영.김민철, "불소계 온실가스 감축을 위한 국내외 냉매 관리 동향", GTC BRIEF, 2021년 1호, 녹색기술센터, 2021.
9 박연화.인은정.김홍록, "냉매부문 온실가스 감축을 위한 외부감축사업 활용에 관한 조사 연구 -CDM, 캘리포니아 상쇄제도를 중심으로-", 「한국기후변화학회지」, 제7권 제3호, 2016, pp. 283~288.
10 박진식.김병순.오세기, "국제 HFC냉매 규제동향과 대응활동 제안", 대한설비공학회 2017 동계학술발표대회 논문집, 2017, pp. 53~57.
11 박창용, "대기환경보전법의 HFC 냉매 규제방향", 대한설비공학회 2015 하계학술발표대회 논문집, 2015, pp. 115~117.
12 차준원, "국내.외 냉매관리 관련 법률 및 제도", 국내IP 환경동향보고, 환경부.한국환경산업기술원, 2019.
13 한국에너지기기산업진흥회, "F-GAS 현황 및 ISSUE", 건설기계 분야 품목별 협의회 비공개 회의자료, 2022.
14 한택환.임동순, "A Comparative Study on the F-Gas Control Laws and Systems of EU and Korea", 「환경법연구」, 제40권 제3호, 2018, pp. 377~410.   DOI
15 CECE, CECE Technical Bulletin, March 21st 2022, Committee for European Construction Equipment, 2022.
16 ECHA, List of substances subject to POPs Regulation, European Chemicals Agency, 2022a, Accessed 2022.7.29., https://echa.europa.eu/list-of-substances-subject-to-pops-regulation
17 EC, A European Green Deal, European Commission, 2019, Accessed 2022.11.10., https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
18 EC, Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on fluorinated greenhouse gases, amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 517/2014, COM(2022) 150 final, April 5th 2022. European Commission, 2022.
19 ECHA, Regulatory Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document, European Chemicals Agency, 2021, Accessed 2022.11.10. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/a59647fb-fcc5-869b-10d4-c14258bbea1d
20 ECHA, Understanding REACH, European Chemicals Agency, 2022b, Accessed 2022.11.10., https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/reach/understanding-reach
21 EFCTC, Update on the PFAS restriction proposal and F-gases by the Norwegian Environment Agency, European FluoroCarbons Technical Committee, 10 May 2022, Accessed 2022.7.30., https://www.fluorocarbons.org/news/update-on-the-pfas-restriction-proposal-and-f-gases-by-the-norwegian-environment-agency/
22 EPA, Ozone-Depleting Substances, Environmental Protection Agency, 2022, Accessed 2022.11.10., https://www.epa.gov/ozone-layer-protection/ozone-depleting-substances
23 GCC, Member States, Gulf Cooperation Council, 2022, Accessed 2022.11.10., https://www.gcc-sg.org/en-us/AboutGCC/MemberStates/Pages/Home.aspx
24 HM Government, Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener, October 2021, Government of the United Kingdom officially Her Majesty's Government, 2021.
25 OJ, REGULATION (EC) No 1907/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, OJ L 396, December 30th 2006, Official Journal of the European Union, 2006, pp. 1~849.
26 IPCC, Global Warming of 1.5℃. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Portner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pean, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)], Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018.
27 NEA, The universal PFAS restriction proposal and F-gases, Norwegian Environment Agency, 2022, Accessed 2022.7.29., https://www.environmentagency.no/news/2022/the-universal-pfas-restriction-proposal-and-f-gases/
28 OJ, Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC, OJ L 158, April 30th 2004, Official Journal of the European Union, 2004, pp. 7~49.
29 OJ, REGULATION (EU) No 517/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006, OJ L 150, May 20th 2014, Official Journal of the European Union, 2014, pp. 195~230.
30 OJ, REGULATION (EU) 2021/1119 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC)No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 ('European Climate Law'), OJ L 243, July 9th 2021, Official Journal of the European Union, 2021, pp. 1~17.
31 UNEP, Decision XXVIII/1: Further Amendment of the Montreal Protocol, United Nations Environment Programme, 2019, Accessed 2022.10.10., https://ozone.unep.org/sites/default/files/2019-04/Original_depositary_notification_english_version_with_corrections.pdf