Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15434/kssh.2019.32.2.67

Effects of Academic Engagement and Negative Psychological Tendency on Self-Directed Learning Ability among Undergraduate Students  

An, Minjeong (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University)
Nho, Juyeon (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University)
Jang, Hye Joo (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University)
Choi, Juhye (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University)
Han, Doheon (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University)
Han, Sujin (College of Nursing, Chonnam National University)
Song, Chi Eun (Department of Nursing, Nambu University)
Hwang, Yoon Young (Seoul Women's College of Nursing)
Publication Information
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore self-directed learning ability and its affecting factors among undergraduate students. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. Using a convenience sampling method, data were collected from 196 undergraduate students enrolled in one national university. Negative psychological tendency (i.e. Type D personality), academic engagement, and self-directed learning ability were assessed using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, and analysis of covariance, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and stepwise multiple linear regression, using SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. Results: The mean age of the students was $21.61{\pm}2.40years$ and 56.6% were male students. Approximately, one third (n=67, 34.2%) of the students had Type D personality. The average scores of academic engagement and self-directed learning ability were $3.01{\pm}1.14$ and $3.46{\pm}0.50$, respectively. After controlling for sociodemographic variables, the Type D personality and academic engagement were significant predictors of self-directed learning ability (${\beta}=.64$, p<.001; ${\beta}=-.13$, p=.021, respectively). This model explained 53.6% of the variance in self-directed learning ability. Conclusion: The study identified that Type D personality and academic engagement affect self-directed learning ability of undergraduate students, one in a negative way, the other in a positive way. Educators and educational policy makers need to make efforts to include interventions and strategies that increase academic engagement and change negative psychological dispositions such as D-type personality in the undergraduate education curriculum.
Keywords
Academic engagement; Psychology; Self-directed learning ability; Students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Song UJ, Jung GS. The effect of college student's self-directed learning ability on problem-solving ability: focusing on the mediation effect of self-efficacy. Korean Youth Research Association. 2017;24(12):219-243. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2017.12.24.12.219
2 Sung EM, Choi HS. Exploring the factors of self-directed learning competency of the highest academic-achievement learners in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology. 2016;32(2):427-452. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.2.427   DOI
3 Lee JM, Lee KJ. A study on the factors associated with selfdirected learning ability of college students. Korean Journal of Educational Administration. 2017;35(3):133-153.
4 Chung MK. The development of self-regulated learning test for secondary school students. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 2003;41(4):157-182.
5 Ahn DH, Kim YR. The relationship between self-directed learning, relatedness, self-concept, and academic achievement of Korean adolescents. Korean Journal of Educational Research. 2014;52(1):1-25.
6 Bae SA, Sung SY. Analysis of the structural relationship among college students' character strength, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2016;16(3):809-827.
7 Cazan AM, Schiopca BA. Self-directed learning, personality traits and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;127:640-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.327   DOI
8 Denollet J. DS14: standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and type D personality. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2005;67(1):89-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000149256.81953.49   DOI
9 Jung SA, Shin YS. Discriminating high risk personality for coronary heart disease (type A and type D) from a normal group by analyzing blood pressure data. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2017;22(3):725-744. https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2017.22.3.014   DOI
10 Wu JR, Moser DK. Type D personality predicts poor medication adherence in patients with heart failure in the USA. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2014;21(5):833-842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9366-2   DOI
11 Cho S, Jeon GS. Gender differences in type D personality and mental health among Korean college entrants. The Korean Journal of Stress Research. 2018;26(3):133-139. https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2018.26.3.133   DOI
12 Jeon MK, Kim YJ. Effect of type D personality on life stress in university students. The Korean Journal of Stress Research. 2017;25(3):188-194. https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2017.25.3.188   DOI
13 Yoo SW, Park H. University public relations and academic achievement. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies. 2018;62(5):329-363. https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2018.62.5.010   DOI
14 Kim AK. The mediating effect of resilience in the relationship between self-directed learning ability and academic burnout of university students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2018;18(12):615-635. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.12.615   DOI
15 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods. 2009;41:1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149   DOI
16 Lim HE, Lee MS, Ko YH, Park YM, Joe SH, Kim YK, et al. Assessment of the type D personality construct in the Korean population: a validation study of the Korean DS14. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2011;26(1):116-123. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.1.116   DOI
17 Schaufeli WB, Martinez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2002;33(5):464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003   DOI
18 An M, Kang AT, Kim YA, Kim MJ, Kim YL, Kim HW, et al. Comparison of academic engagement, academic burnout, stress, and social support by grade among undergraduate nursing students. Journal of the Korean Society of School Health. 2017;30(2):113-123. https://doi.org/10.15434/kssh.2017.30.2.113   DOI
19 Lee SJ, Chang YK, Lee HN, Park KY. A study on the development of life-skills: communication, problem solving, and selfdirected learning. Korean Education Development Institute. 2003;15(3):135-142.
20 Kwon MS. The influence of self-directed learning & critical thinking disposition on clinical competence in nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2011;17(3):387-394. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2011.17.3.387   DOI
21 Jang TW, Hong AJ. Enhancing organizational commitment and job involvement through self-directed learning and absorptive capacity. Knowledge Management Research. 2011;12(2):17-34. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2011.12.2.002
22 Lee HJ, Sung EM. An analysis of learning strategies of high academic achievers for learner-centered instructional design in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology. 2011;27(1):1-36.   DOI
23 Lee JH, Yun MH, Yune SJ. The differences of self-directed learning and approaches to learning in adult learners by sex and age. Andragogy Today: International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education. 2007;10(4):125-149.
24 Han SM. Development and effects of self-directed learning strategy program for college students. Asian Journal of Education. 2006;7(3):1-30.
25 Cho A, Roh SZ. The analysis of structural relationships among self-directed learning ability, learning flow, learning attitude, academic satisfaction and achievement in cyber university. Journal of Educational Technology. 2013;29(4):849-879.   DOI
26 Jang YO, Jeong SL. Moderating effects of self-regulated learning strategies on the relation between academic stress, academic burnout and academic engagement in adolescents. Secondary Education Research. 2017;65(1):195-223. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2017.65.1.195   DOI
27 Noh JH, Lim EJ, Jeong YS. Factors influencing type D personality of female undergraduate students majoring in nursing. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2013;14(12):6265-6274. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.12.6265   DOI
28 Lim BR. Development of a 'learning affection' scale for the selfdirected learners. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies. 2011;23(4):827-853. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2011.23.4.827   DOI