Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15434/kssh.2016.29.3.256

A Comparative Study on the Factors Influencing Risk Behaviors of Adolescents Living in Small and Medium-sized Cities and Rural Communities  

Park, Hyun Sook (College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Catholic University of Daegu)
Yeo, Hyun Ju (College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Catholic University of Daegu)
Jung, Sun Young (College of Nursing, The Research Institute of Nursing Science, Catholic University of Daegu)
Publication Information
Abstract
Purpose: This study was to compare and to examine the factors related to risk behaviors of adolescents living in small and medium-sized cities and in rural areas. Methods: The subjects were 545 adolescents (295 from small and medium-sized cities and 250 from rural areas). The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, Pearson corelation coefficients, and multiple regression with IBM SPSS 19.0 program. Results: The factors influencing the risk behaviors of adolescents in small- medium cities were school, peer risk factors and community risk factors, self- control among protective factors, positive communication with parents, positive peer associations, these variables explained 42.0%. The most important variable explaining the risk behaviors of adolescents in small- medium cities was positive communication with parents, followed by community risk factors, peer risk factors, positive peer relationships, school and self-control. The factors affecting the risk behaviors of rural adolescents were school, personal risk factor, peer risk factor, self- control factor, which explained 38.5% of the risk behaviors of adolescents in rural areas. Among them, the most important variable explaining risk behaviors was personal risk factors, followed by peer risk factors, school, and self-control. Conclusion: These finding suggest a need to develop a strategy to improve positive communication with parents for adolescents living in small- medium cities and a strategy to reduce personal risk factors and peer risk factors for rural adolescents.
Keywords
Adolescent; Risk behaviors; Medium-sized cities; Rural;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Azmawati MN, Hazariah HS, Shamsul AS, Norfazilah A, Azimatun NA, Rozita H. Risk taking behavior among urban and rural adolescents in two selected districts in Malaysia. South African Family Practice. 2015;57(63):160-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2014.977048   DOI
2 Field J, Casper L. America's families and living arrangements. Current Population Series. 2001;1:20-537.
3 Kim HL, Kim SA. Analysis of factors influencing risk-taking behavior in middle school students. Journal of Academic Psychiatry Mental Health Nursing. 2011;20(1):91-102.. https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2011.20.1.91.   DOI
4 Nam JJ. Socio-demographic variables, psychological, and family environment related to adolescent's risk-taking behaviors [mater's thesis]. Cheonju.: Chungbuk National University; 2012. p. 1-77.
5 Barbara A, Jean T, Larson MS. Adolescents in mid-sized and rural communities: foregone care, perceived barriers, and risk factor. Journal of Adolescent health. 2004;35:303-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.015   DOI
6 Maggs JL, Hurrelmann K. Do substance use and delinquency have differential associations with adolescent's peer relation?. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2010;18:367-388.
7 Kang HJ, Nho CR. The effect of area on adolescent's self-concept. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2012;23(4):101-129.
8 Lee HK. Current status of adolescent behaviors problem and crisis problems perceived by teachers. Journal of Adolescent Welfare. 2012;14(1):239-271.
9 Kim WS, Ju SJ. A comparative study on factors of the effects on juvenile's maladjustment to their school life in urban or rural community. Korea Youth Research Association. 2010;17(11):183-203.
10 Han SC. Analysis of a prediction factor of risk behavior with adolescents at a small cities. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004;18(3):193-210.
11 Oh MK, Ahn JY. The effect of children's sensation seeking on experience of committing a school violence: Moderating effect of communication with parents. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2013;20(3):31-54.
12 Jung JH, Kim PH. Moderating effects of protective factors on the relationship between sensation seeking and risk behavior of adolescents in lower income family. Journal of Future Youth. 2014;11(2):207-225.
13 Park HS, Jung SY. Development of the structural model of adolescent's risk behavior. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2011;41(3):364-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2011.41.3.364   DOI
14 Jo JY, Kim YH. A Path model of self, family, & extrafamilial system factors associated with adolescents' sexual risk behaviors. Family and Environment Research. 2006;44(3):181-195.
15 Lee JM, Bell N. Individual differences, attitudes toward risk behaviors, parents and peers as correlates of adolescent risk Behaviors. Family and Environment Research. 2004;452(12):55-67.
16 Park JH, Kim SH. Development of the adolescent brain and behavioral and cognitive characteristic. Journal of the Korean Society of Biological Therapies in Psychiatry. 2011;17(1):11-20.
17 Han, SC. Analysis to influence of risk factors and protective factors on adolescent's sex risk behavior. Journal of Future Youth. 2009;6(4):185-210.
18 Kim EY. Effects of the familial risk factors on emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents - The mediating effects of executive function. Studies on Korean Youth. 2014;25(2):79-113.   DOI
19 Kim DL, Choi SM, Hong SD. Relationship between psychological risk factors and problem behaviors of at-risk youth: Validation of the mediating effect of environmental protective factors. Korea Journal of Counseling. 2006;8(3):1121-1136.
20 Selman RL, Schultz LN, Nakkula M, Barr D, Wichmond J. Friendship and fighting: A developmental approach to the study of risk and prevention of violence. Development and Psychopathology. 1992;4:529-558.   DOI
21 Kim SS, Kim KJ, Kyung SJ. A study on the development of rural youth policy for the 21st century. Journal of Agricultural and Industrial Education. 2000;32(4):53-64.
22 Park SG, Kim SJ, Moon SH. An analysis of regional disparities of youth social capital. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2013;20(4):119-224.
23 Kim KJ, Oh HS, Kim JM. A Analysis on life conditions and welfare needs for rural youth. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2006;13(1):85-97.
24 Oh MK. Relationships between adolescence's sensation seeking and their risk behaviors. Korean Association of Child Studies. 1997;18(1):109-123.
25 Yoon EH. The Validation of adolescent risk scale [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul University; 2007. p. 1-56.
26 Jun HY, Choi JJ, Kim CS. A Study of multidimensional model of protective and risk factors for youth at risk. Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2001;20(1):307-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.1.017   DOI
27 Gullone E, Moore SM, Moss S, Boyd CP. The adolescent risk-taking questionnaire (ARQ): Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Adolescent Research. 2002;15:231-250.
28 Han SC. The influences of sensation seeking and coping strategies on adolescents' risk behavior. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003;17(4):1-26.