Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.3.001

Significance and Limitations of Record Continuum in Electronic Record Environment: Focusing on Meaning and Nature of Records  

Kim, Myoung-hun (국립 강릉원주대학교)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / v.21, no.3, 2021 , pp. 1-16 More about this Journal
Abstract
Record continuum is a theory providing the basis for archival science in the paradigm shift to the electronic record environment. However, critical analysis of it has been hardly performed so far, as it is still in development, and its core is a new perspective on records different from the life cycle model. Therefore, for further understanding of the significance and limitations of record continuum in the electronic record environment and performance of more in-depth theoretical development, an analysis of the meaning and nature of records contained in record continuum logic is essential. Given that record continuum does not define a record separately, the meaning and nature of records it contains in the recent electronic record environment are examined through the analysis of axis and dimension in a record continuum model.
Keywords
Record Continuum; Life Cycle; Record; Archive; Electronic Record;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 McKemmish, S. (2001). Placing Records Continuum Theory and Practice. Archival Science, 1(4), 333-359.   DOI
2 Kim, Myoung Hun (2010). Records Continuum, Appraisal and Archival Contents: Building the Concept of Archival Contents. Journal of Information Management, 41(3), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.3.131   DOI
3 Kim, Myoung Hun (2017). A Study on the Meaning of Record Contents Based on Record Continuum: Focusing on the Record Contents of Religious Institutions. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 52, 246-281. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.52.246   DOI
4 Kim, Myoung Hun (2021). A Study on the Origin of Record Continuum Theory: Focusing on the Comparison with Record Lifecycle Model. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 68, 5-39. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.68.005   DOI
5 Ko, Young Bok (2000). Dictionary of Sociology. Seoul: Socio-Culture Research Press.
6 Lee, Seung Eok (2001). The Prospect of 'Recordkeeping Regime' in the Public Sector of Korea: Examination on the characteristics of the Tables of Transactions for Records Scheduling by PRA Act. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 4, 31-62. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2001.4.031   DOI
7 Noh, Meung Hoan (2016). Understanding of Records/Archives and Archives Management Based on the Semiotics and Constructivism of Sunglihak: Focused on the Understanding and Supplement of Records. Continuum. Journal of History and Culture, 57, 149-219.
8 Bettington, J. (2004). Standardised Recordkeeping: Reality or Illusion?. Archives & Manuscripts, 32(2), 46-69.
9 Cook, T. (2000). Beyond the Screen: The Records Continuum and Archival Cultural Heritage. Paper presented at the Australian Society of Archivists Conference. Available: http://www.mybestdocs.com/cook-t-beyondthescreen-000818.htm
10 Won, Jong Kwan (2007). A Study on Reconciliation of Evidence and Memory Based on the Characteristics of the Records Continuum. Thesis of Master in Department of Information and Records Management, Graduate School of Hankook University of Foreign Studies.
11 Brothman, B. (2001). The Past that Archives Keep: Memory, History, and the Preservation of Archival Records. Archivaria, 51, 48-80.
12 Brothman, B. (2002). Afterglow: Conceptions of Records and Evidence in Archival Discourse. Archival Science, 2(3/4), 311-342.   DOI
13 Cook, T. (2001). Archival Science and Postmodernism: New Formulations for Old Concepts. Archival Science, 1(1), 3-24.   DOI
14 Upward, F., McKemmish, S., & Reed, B. (2011). Archivists and Changing Social and Information Spaces. Archivaria, 72, 197-237.
15 Cox, J. R. (2001). Managing Records as Evidence and Information. Westport, Conn.: Quorum Books.
16 Hartland, R., McKemmish, S., & Upward, F. (2005). Documents. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
17 Harris, V. (2005). Recordkeeping and Records Continuum Thinkers: Examining a Seminal Australian Text. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(2), 160-170.
18 Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
19 Flynn, J. A. S. (2001). The Records Continuum Model in Context and Its Implications for Archival Practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), 79-93.   DOI
20 Giddens, A. (1998). Sociology. 김미숙, 김용학, 박길성, 송호근, 신광영, 유홍준, 정성호 옮김 (1998). 현대 사회학(3판). 서울: 을유문화사.
21 Karabinos, M. (2018). In the Shadows of the Continuum: Testing the Records Continuum Model through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office 'Migrated Archives'. Archival Science, 18(3), 207-224.   DOI
22 Hofman, H. (2005). Archive. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
23 Hurley, C. (1998). The Making and Keeping of Records(1): What Are Finding Aids For?. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 58-77.
24 Duff, W. (1995). Defining Transactions to Identify Records and Assess Risk. Cox, J. R. ed. University of Pittsburgh Recordkeeping Functional Requirements Project: Reports and Working Papers - Progress Report 2.(LIS057/LS95001). Pittsburgh: School of Library and Information Science, University of Pittsburgh.
25 McKemmish, S. & Upward, F. (1991). Archival Document: A Submission to the Inquiry into Australia as an Information Society. Archives & Manuscript, 19(1), 17-31.
26 McKemmish, S. (1994). Are Records Ever Actual?. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. McKemmish, S. & Piggott, M. eds. Clayton: Ancora Press & Australian Archives.
27 McKemmish, S. (1997). Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/conference_contribution/Yesterday_today_and_tomorrow_a_continuum_of_responsibility/4037433
28 McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Ward, N., & Reed, B. (1999). Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Archivaria, 48, 3-37.
29 McKemmish, S. (2005). Traces: Document, Record, Archive, Archives. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
30 McKemmish, S. (2017). Recordkeeping in the Continuum: An Australian Tradition. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Gilliland, J. A., McKemmish, S. & Lau, J. A. eds. Clayton: Monash University Publishing.
31 Piggott, M. (1998). The History of Australian Record-keeping: A Framework for Research. The Australian Library Journal, 47(4), 343-354.   DOI
32 Piggott, M. (2005a). Building Collective Memory Archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 62-83.
33 Reed, B. (2005a). Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the Potential of Pluralised Recordkeeping. Available: https://www.records.com.au/pdf/Beyond_perceived_boundaries.pdf
34 Nesmith, T. (2008). Re-exploring the Continuum, Rediscovering Archives. Archives & Manuscripts, 36(2), 34-53.
35 Schellenberg, T. R. (1956). Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. 이원영 옮김 (2002). 현대 기록학개론. 서울: 진리탐구.
36 Upward, F. (1994). In Search of the Continuum: Ian Maclean's 'Australian Experience' Essays on Recordkeeping. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/In_search_of_the_continuum_Ian_Maclean_s_Australian_Experience_Essays_on_Recordkeeping/4060014
37 Piggott, M. (2005b). Archives and Memory. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B. & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
38 Piggott, M. (2012). Archives and Societal Provenance: Australian Essays. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
39 Reed, B. (2005b). Reading the Records Continuum: Interpretations and Explorations. Archives & Manuscripts, 33(1), 18-43.
40 Reed, B. (2005c). Records. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society(Australasian Library and Information Studies 24). McKemmish, S., Piggott, M., Reed, B., & Upward, F. eds. Wagga Wagga: Centre for Information Studies Charles Sturt University.
41 Upward, F. (1996). Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial Principles and Properties. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/Structuring_the_records_continuum_-_part_one_postcustodial_principles_and_properties/4037445/1
42 Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond - A Personal Reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115-139.   DOI
43 McKemmish, S. (1998). The Smoking Gun: Recordkeeping and Accountability. Available: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/conference_contribution/The_smoking_gun_recordkeeping_and_accountability/4037394
44 Wickman, D. (1999). What's New? Functional Analysis in Life Cycle and Continuum Environments. Archives & Manuscripts, 26(1), 114-127.
45 Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1996). The Social Life of Documents. First Monday, 1(1). Available: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/466/820
46 Hoke, E. J. G. (2011). Records Life Cycle: A Cradle-to-Grave Metaphor. Information Management Journal, 45(5), 28-32.
47 McKemmish, S., Faulkhead, S., & Russell, L. (2011). Distrust in the Archive: Reconciling Records. Archival Science, 11(3-4), 211-239.
48 Bailey, C. (1989~1990). Archival Theory and Electronic Records. Archivaria, 29, 180-196.
49 Bearman, D. (1994). Electronic Evidence: Strategies for Managing Records in Contemporary Organizations. Pittsburgh: Archives & Museum Information.
50 Atherton, J. (1985~1986). From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management-Archives Relationship. Archivaria, 21, 43-51.
51 Yusof, M. Z. & Chell, W. R. (2000). The Records Life Cycle: An Inadequate Concept for Technology-generated Records. Information Development, 16(3), 135-141.   DOI