Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.1.117

Strategies for the Development of "Detailed Nondisclosure Standards" for Public Institutions  

Hwang, Jinhyun (한국외국어대학교 정보기록학과)
Lim, Jimin (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원)
Byeon, Wooyeong (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원)
Yim, Jinhee (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / v.21, no.1, 2021 , pp. 117-139 More about this Journal
Abstract
"Detailed Nondisclosure Standards" of an institution include subject information and rationale that should not be disclosed by the institution. According to the Information Disclosure Act, such standards must be established in consideration of the nature of work, and continuous implementation is required. However, studies that reviewed the purpose and role of "Detailed Nondisclosure Standards" or the status of public institutions' development and operation of such standards were insufficient despite such standards being an indispensable tool in practice and a major device to protect the people's right to know. Therefore, this study introduces the strategies of the public institution and the research team to develop detailed standards for nondisclosure through the case of institution A. This will be of practical help to public institutions that intend to develop detailed nondisclosure standards in the future based on communication between institution A and the research team and sharing details during the project process.
Keywords
Information disclosure; Information disclosure act; Detailed nondisclosure standards; Appraisal of information disclosure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, Miyoung (2007). A study on the construction of records management criteria. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 15, 185-218. DOI: 10.20923/kjas.2007.15.185   DOI
2 Lee, Sejin & Kim, Hwakyung (2016). A Case Study on Improvement of Records Management Reference Table by Reorganizing BRM: The case of Reorganization of Seoul's BRM and Records Management Reference Table. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 50, 273-309. DOI: 10.20923/kjas.2016.50.273   DOI
3 Lim, Hee-Youn (2016). Improvement of access re-review in archives: The Seoul Metropolitan Office of Cases. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 49, 277-297. DOI: 10.20923/kjas.2016.49.277   DOI
4 Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2019). Information disclosure work manual. Seoul: Ministry of the Interior and Safety.
5 Seoul Metropolitan Government (2020). Information disclosure work manual. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government.
6 Zoh, Youngsam (2009). The Promotion State and Measures to Improve the Record Information Disclosure System. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 22, 77-114.
7 Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2020). Reasons for amendment of clause of Official Information Disclosure Act.
8 OFFICIAL INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ACT.
9 Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2020). Plan for evaluating the status of information disclosure by public institutions.
10 Seoul Metropolitan Government (2020). Plan for evaluating the status of information disclosure by affiliated organization.
11 Ahn, Jihyun (2006). A Study on Management and Utilization of Non-disclosure Records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 13, 135-178. DOI: 10.20923/kjas.2006.13.135   DOI
12 Choi, Jeongmin & Kim, Youseung (2013). A Study on the Research Trends of Information Freedom in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 13(3), 173-197. DOI: 10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.3.173   DOI
13 Hong, Ilpyo (2009). 'Dual Transformation' of Freedom of Information Movements and Civic Participation. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 22, 37-76. DOI: 10.20923/kjas.2009.22.037   DOI
14 Jeon, Seulbi (2016). A Study on the Improvement of the Information Disclosure System in Central Administrative Agencies. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 61-88. DOI: 10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.061   DOI
15 Kang, Hyunho (2015). Current trends of the supreme court decisions regarding disclosure of administrative informations of public institutions. SungKyunKwan Law Review, 27(1), 91-133. DOI: 10.17008/skklr.2015.27.1.004   DOI
16 Kim, Hwakyung (2007). A Case Study of a Acquisition & Appraisal Policy of Business Archives: With a focus on Meritz. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 15, 219-262.
17 Lee, Boram & Lee, Younghak (2013). A Study on Institutional Reliability of Open Record Information in the Information Disclosure System. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 35, 41-91. DOI: 10.20923/kjas.2013.35.041   DOI
18 Lee, Ilse (2015). A Case Study on the Official Information Disclosure: focused on the reasons of non-disclosure. kangwon Law Review, 45, 145-210. DOI: 10.18215/kwlr.2015.45..145   DOI