Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.077

A Study on the Judgment of Authoritative Records by Applying the Concept of Authenticity and Reliability  

Lee, Gemma (숙명여자대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과)
Oh, Kyung-Mook (숙명여자대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / v.20, no.3, 2020 , pp. 77-97 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study seeks to analyze the concepts of authenticity and reliability of records and apply them to the criteria for judging authoritative records subject to legal management. While reliability is determined by the degree of completeness and control in the records creation stage, authenticity is ensured by preventing manipulation and tampering that occur after records creation. Authoritative records with reliability in the creation stage are legally subject to management, so such records can be subject to punishment if they are destroyed because of negligence. It is necessary to take active measures to ensure reliability, continuous authenticity after creation, and complete records creation by controlled procedures and methods before records capture. The lack of such an evidential characteristic does not mean that it is not a record, and such records are also created in reality, managed in a system, and delivered to the next generation as a representation of social memory and activities.
Keywords
Authoritative records; Authenticity; Reliability; Integrity; Trustworthiness; Concepts of records; Electronic records; Digital records; Records quality requirements;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Duranti, Luciana & Rogers, Corinne (2012). Trust in digital records: An increasingly cloudy legal area. Computer Law & Security Review, 28, 522-531.   DOI
2 Duranti, Luciana & Rogers, Corinne(edited) (2019). Trusting Records in the Cloud. London: Facet Publishing.
3 Gilliland, Anne (2018). Conceptualizing 21st-century archives. ALA Editions: Chicago.
4 InterPARES I Authenticity Task Force (2002). Requirements for Assessing and Maintaining the Authenticity of Electronic Records.
5 ISO (2016). ISO 15489-1: Records management: concepts and principles. International Organization for Standardization.
6 Jenkinson, Hilary (1937). A Manual of Archive Administration. New and Revised. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co., http://www.archive.org/details/manualofarchivea00iljenk
7 Library and Archives Canada (2016). General Application Guide for the Disposition Authorization for Transitory Records.
8 MacNeil, Heather & Gilliland-Swetland, Ann (2005). Authenticity Task Force Report. In: DURANTI, Luciana (ed.) 2005, The Long-Term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: Finding of the InterPARES Project. http://www.interpares.org/book/
9 MacNeil, Heather & Mak, Bonnie (2007). Constructions of Authenticity. Library Trends. Baltimore, 56 (1), 26-52.   DOI
10 Rogers, Corinne (2016). A Literature Review of Authenticity of Records in Digital Systems: From 'Machine-Readable' to Records in the Cloud. acervo, rio de janeiro, 29(2), 16-44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320593846
11 Yeo, Geoffrey (2018). Records, Information and Data. London: Facet Publishing.
12 Federal Rules of Evidence. Retrieved 2020.05.15., from https://www.rulesofevidence.org/
13 Finding of the InterPARES Project. http://www.interpares.org/book/
14 InterPARES, InterPARES Project. Retrieved 2020.7.7., from http://www.interpares.org/
15 InterPARES, InterPARES Trust Terminology. Retrieved 2020.05.25., from https://interparestrust.org/terminology/term/authenticity/en
16 Society of American Archivists, Dictionary of Archives Terminology. Retrieved 2020.06.02., from https://dictionary.archivists.org/
17 Lee, Kyungnam (2019). A Study on Authentication Model using Blockchain. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 47-79. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.047
18 National Archives of Korea(NAK) (2019). A Study on the Legislative Evaluation and Improvement of the Public Records Management Act. Final Report(Korea Legislation Research Institute).
19 Seol, Moon-Won (2005). Quality Criteria for Measuing Authenticity, Reliability, Integrity and Usability of Records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 11, 5-38. UCI: G704-001548.2005..11.007
20 Youn, Eunha (2019). A Study on the Concepts of Record from a Legal Perspective The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 89-111. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089
21 Lee, Sang-Won (2012). Electronic Evidence and Best Evidence Rule, Contemporary Review of Criminal Law, 36, 50-104.
22 Lee, Sook Yeon (2017). The Admissibility of Digital Evidence - The Status of Identity and Integrity in Assessing the Admissibility of Digital Evidence and the Interpretation of Article 313 of the Amended Criminal Procedure Act. The Justice, 161, 164-199.
23 Lee, Yoon-Ju & Lee, So-Yeon (2009). A Policy Framework for the Long-term Preservation of Authentic Digital Records: Based on InterPARES Studies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 193-249. UCI: G704-001548.2009..19.006
24 COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RESOURCES (Clir) (2000). Authenticity in a Digital Environment. Washington (D.C.), Available in: .
25 Cho, Kwang-hun (2015). The review and interpretation of the issues in the evidence admissibility of electronic information. Chung-Ang Journal of Legal Studies, 39(3), 183-237. http://doi.org/10.22853/caujls.2015.39.3.183
26 Choi, Young Min (2018). Archival Analysis on Requirements for Admissibility of Evidence of Electronic Records. MA. PUSAN National University Graduate School.
27 COOK, Michael (1986). The Management of Information from Archives. Aldershot, Hants, England: Brookfield, Vt., U.S.A: Gower.
28 Dollar, Charles M (2000). Authentic Electronic Records: Strategies for Long-Term Access. Chicago: Cohasset Associates, Inc.
29 Duranti, Luciana (1989). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science(Part I). Archivaria, 28, 7-27.
30 Duranti, Luciana (1995). Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications. Archivaria, 39, 5-10.
31 Duranti, Luciana (1996). Archival Science. In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York, Basel, Hong Kong: Marcel Dekker, 59, 1-19.
32 Duranti, Luciana (2001). The Impact of Digital Technology on Archival Science. Archival Science, 1(1), 39-55, 2001. Doi:10.1007/BF02435638.   DOI
33 Duranti, Luciana & Eastwood, Terry (1995). Protecting Electronic Evidence: A Progress Report on a Research Study and Its Methodology. Archivi and Computer, Roma, 3, 213-50.
34 Duranti, Luciana & MacNeil, Heather (1997). The Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project. Archivaria, 42, 46-67.