1 |
Duranti, Luciana & Rogers, Corinne (2012). Trust in digital records: An increasingly cloudy legal area. Computer Law & Security Review, 28, 522-531.
DOI
|
2 |
Duranti, Luciana & Rogers, Corinne(edited) (2019). Trusting Records in the Cloud. London: Facet Publishing.
|
3 |
Gilliland, Anne (2018). Conceptualizing 21st-century archives. ALA Editions: Chicago.
|
4 |
InterPARES I Authenticity Task Force (2002). Requirements for Assessing and Maintaining the Authenticity of Electronic Records.
|
5 |
ISO (2016). ISO 15489-1: Records management: concepts and principles. International Organization for Standardization.
|
6 |
Jenkinson, Hilary (1937). A Manual of Archive Administration. New and Revised. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co., http://www.archive.org/details/manualofarchivea00iljenk
|
7 |
Library and Archives Canada (2016). General Application Guide for the Disposition Authorization for Transitory Records.
|
8 |
MacNeil, Heather & Gilliland-Swetland, Ann (2005). Authenticity Task Force Report. In: DURANTI, Luciana (ed.) 2005, The Long-Term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: Finding of the InterPARES Project. http://www.interpares.org/book/
|
9 |
MacNeil, Heather & Mak, Bonnie (2007). Constructions of Authenticity. Library Trends. Baltimore, 56 (1), 26-52.
DOI
|
10 |
Rogers, Corinne (2016). A Literature Review of Authenticity of Records in Digital Systems: From 'Machine-Readable' to Records in the Cloud. acervo, rio de janeiro, 29(2), 16-44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320593846
|
11 |
Yeo, Geoffrey (2018). Records, Information and Data. London: Facet Publishing.
|
12 |
Federal Rules of Evidence. Retrieved 2020.05.15., from https://www.rulesofevidence.org/
|
13 |
Finding of the InterPARES Project. http://www.interpares.org/book/
|
14 |
InterPARES, InterPARES Project. Retrieved 2020.7.7., from http://www.interpares.org/
|
15 |
InterPARES, InterPARES Trust Terminology. Retrieved 2020.05.25., from https://interparestrust.org/terminology/term/authenticity/en
|
16 |
Society of American Archivists, Dictionary of Archives Terminology. Retrieved 2020.06.02., from https://dictionary.archivists.org/
|
17 |
Lee, Kyungnam (2019). A Study on Authentication Model using Blockchain. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 47-79. http://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.047
|
18 |
National Archives of Korea(NAK) (2019). A Study on the Legislative Evaluation and Improvement of the Public Records Management Act. Final Report(Korea Legislation Research Institute).
|
19 |
Seol, Moon-Won (2005). Quality Criteria for Measuing Authenticity, Reliability, Integrity and Usability of Records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 11, 5-38. UCI: G704-001548.2005..11.007
|
20 |
Youn, Eunha (2019). A Study on the Concepts of Record from a Legal Perspective The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 89-111. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089
|
21 |
Lee, Sang-Won (2012). Electronic Evidence and Best Evidence Rule, Contemporary Review of Criminal Law, 36, 50-104.
|
22 |
Lee, Sook Yeon (2017). The Admissibility of Digital Evidence - The Status of Identity and Integrity in Assessing the Admissibility of Digital Evidence and the Interpretation of Article 313 of the Amended Criminal Procedure Act. The Justice, 161, 164-199.
|
23 |
Lee, Yoon-Ju & Lee, So-Yeon (2009). A Policy Framework for the Long-term Preservation of Authentic Digital Records: Based on InterPARES Studies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 193-249. UCI: G704-001548.2009..19.006
|
24 |
COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RESOURCES (Clir) (2000). Authenticity in a Digital Environment. Washington (D.C.), Available in: .
|
25 |
Cho, Kwang-hun (2015). The review and interpretation of the issues in the evidence admissibility of electronic information. Chung-Ang Journal of Legal Studies, 39(3), 183-237. http://doi.org/10.22853/caujls.2015.39.3.183
|
26 |
Choi, Young Min (2018). Archival Analysis on Requirements for Admissibility of Evidence of Electronic Records. MA. PUSAN National University Graduate School.
|
27 |
COOK, Michael (1986). The Management of Information from Archives. Aldershot, Hants, England: Brookfield, Vt., U.S.A: Gower.
|
28 |
Dollar, Charles M (2000). Authentic Electronic Records: Strategies for Long-Term Access. Chicago: Cohasset Associates, Inc.
|
29 |
Duranti, Luciana (1989). Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science(Part I). Archivaria, 28, 7-27.
|
30 |
Duranti, Luciana (1995). Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications. Archivaria, 39, 5-10.
|
31 |
Duranti, Luciana (1996). Archival Science. In: Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York, Basel, Hong Kong: Marcel Dekker, 59, 1-19.
|
32 |
Duranti, Luciana (2001). The Impact of Digital Technology on Archival Science. Archival Science, 1(1), 39-55, 2001. Doi:10.1007/BF02435638.
DOI
|
33 |
Duranti, Luciana & Eastwood, Terry (1995). Protecting Electronic Evidence: A Progress Report on a Research Study and Its Methodology. Archivi and Computer, Roma, 3, 213-50.
|
34 |
Duranti, Luciana & MacNeil, Heather (1997). The Preservation of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project. Archivaria, 42, 46-67.
|