Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.1.023

A Study in the Data Modeling for Archive System Applying RiC  

Shin, Mira (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원 기록관리전공)
Kim, Ikhan (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / v.19, no.1, 2019 , pp. 23-67 More about this Journal
Abstract
Records in Contexts (RiC) is an international archival description standard developed by integrating and normalizing four archival description standards of the International Council of Archives (ICA). RiC has the advantage of diversifying archival description, exposing the context of records, and ensuring data interoperability between disparate systems. In this study, RiC is set up as a key tool in the design of archive systems, and logical data modeling is performed to implement the database. Because of RiC's conceptual model, RiC-CM can be used as a data reference model, and which makes it possible to develop a data model that meets user requirements. Therefore, this study intends to implement these two data models: relational data model, which is widely used as the database on legacy systems, and graphical data model, which can flexibly extend objects around the relationship between information entities.
Keywords
archival description; RiC (Records in Contexts); data modeling; relational data model; graph data model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 10  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, Ik-han (2004). Evaluating Records and Their Descriptive Elements in the Records Management of Korea on the Basis of the Characteristics of a Record and Recordkeeping Metadata Standards. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 10, 3-26.
2 Kim, Chi Soo (2015). Easy-to-learn Software engineering. Seoul: Hanbit Media, Inc..
3 Silverston, Len (2008). The Data Model Resource Book, Vol. 1: A Library of Universal Data Models for All Enterprises(Revised Edition). Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media.
4 Hernandez, M. J. (2013). Database Design for Mere Mortals (3rd): A Hands-on Guide to Relational Database Design. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
5 Kleppmann, Martin (2016). Designing Data-Intensive Applications: The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable, and Maintainable Systems, The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable, and Maintainable Systems. Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media.
6 Fowler, Martin (2002). Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
7 Institute of Digital Archiving Myongji University (2017a). A Study on Conceptual Redesign of the next generation record management: Part 1. http://www.archives.go.kr/next/news/viewPublicationList.do?bg_no=428.
8 Institute of Digital Archiving Myongji University (2017b). A Study on Conceptual Redesign of the next generation record management: Part 2. http://www.archives.go.kr/next/news/viewPublicationList.do?bg_no=429.
9 Park, Zi-Young (2008). A Study on the Application of a CRM-based FRBR Ontology for Cultural Heritage Information: Based on the FRBRoo(object-oriented FRBR). Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 19(2), 45-62.
10 Kim, Sang Rae (2015). Data Modeling Stories Determining Project Success or Failure. Seoul: Hanbit Media, Inc.
11 Park, Zi-Young (2017c). Expanding and Improving FRBR Conceptual Model through FRBRoo. Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 34(4), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.4.201   DOI
12 Park, Zi-Young (2016). Analyzing the Next-generation Archival Description Standard: "Record in Context" of ICA EGAD. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 223-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223   DOI
13 Park, Zi-Young (2017a). Transition of Archival Description from ISAD(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093   DOI
14 Park, Zi-Young (2017b). Improving Archival Descriptive Standard Based on the Analysis of the Reviews by Archival Communities on RiC-CM Draft. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 54, 81-109.
15 Baek, Wook-in (2013). Digital data.information.knowledge. Seoul: CommunicationBooks, Inc.
16 Won, Jong-Kwan (2008). A Study on Reconciliation of Evidence and Memory Based on the Characteristics of the Records Continuum. Master's Thesis, Department of Information and Records Management, The Graduate School of Hankook University of Foreign Studies.
17 Newman, Sam (2015). Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems. Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media.
18 Oh, Jin-Kwan & Yim, Jin-Hee (2018). A Study on Designing a Next-Generation Records Management System. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(2), 163-188. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.2.163   DOI
19 Okuno, Mikiya (2015). Introduction to relational database practice(理論から學ぶデ一タベ一ス實踐入門). Japan: Gijutsuhyoronsha.
20 Lee, Yu-Been & Rieh, Hae-young (2017). A suggestion of interface for ontology-based record retrieval system. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 217-244. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.217   DOI
21 Lee, Chun Sik (2005). Database design and implementation (data modeling with performance considerations). Seoul: Hanbit Media, Inc.
22 Lee, Chun Sik (2008). Design and build a database that seems to know. Seoul: Hanbit Media, Inc.
23 Rieh, Hae-young (2013). Record Organization. Seoul: SuninBook.
24 Lee, Hyun Sil & Han, Sung Kuk (2006). Conceptual Modeling of Record Management Metadata. Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 23(3), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.3.023   DOI
25 Hyun, Moon Soo & Seol, Moon-won (2018). An Exploration of the Direction of Development of the Next Generation Conceptual Model for Organizing Public Digital Records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 56, 183-212.
26 Yim, Jin-Hee, Lee, Dae-Wook, Kim, Eun-Sil, & Kim, Ik-Han (2012). Directions for Developing Database Schema of Records in Archives Management Systems. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 34, 57-105.
27 Korean Society of Archival Studies (2014). Dictionary of Records and Archival Terminology.
28 Hyun, Moon Soo (2014). A Study on the Conceptualization of Information Resources for Localities Based on the FRBRoo/CIDOC CRM. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.265   DOI
29 Hwang, Jin-hyun & Yim, Jin-Hee (2012). A study on Multiple Entity Data Model Design for Visual-Arts Archives and Information Management in the case of the KS X ISO 23081 Multiple Entity Model. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 33, 155-206.
30 ANAI & ICAR (2016). Records In Contexts: A conceptual model for archival description(draft v0.1, september 2016): Il contributo italiano. http://www.ilmondodegliarchivi.org/images/Quaderni/MdA_Quaderni_n2.pdf
31 Belinda Battley, Elizabeth Daniels & Gregory Rolan (2014). Archives as multifaceted narratives: linking the 'touchstones' of community memory. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(2), 155-157.   DOI
32 DB-Engines Ranking of Graph DBMS, 31 systems in ranking, December 2018 Available at: https://db-engines.com/en/ranking/graph+dbms (last visited 2018-12-31).
33 DOREMUS: DOing REusable MUSical Data = Donnees en REutilisation pour la Musique en fonction des Usage. Web site. Available at: www.doremus.org/ (last visited 2018-12-31).
34 Fredric. M. Miller (2002). 아카이브와 매튜스크립트의 정리와 기술. (한국국가기록연구원 감수/조경구 역). 서울: 진리탐구.
35 EGAD (2016). International Council on Archives. Expert Group on Archival Description. 2016. Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description. Consultation Draft v.0.1.
36 EGAD (2017). Presentation of the standard "Records in Context." ICA Expert Group on Archival Description (EGAD): The ALA-ICA annual Conference 2017 Mexico, 27 to 29 November 2017.
37 EGAD (2018). Presentation of the standard "Records in Context" Records in Contexts (RiC): a standard for archival description developed by the ICA Experts Group on Archival Description. International Council on Archives, Paris. Retrieved 12 January 2018.
38 Gretchen Gueguen, Vitor Manoel Marques da Fonseca, Daniel V. Pitti, and Claire Sibille-de Grimouard (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description: A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives' Experts Group on Archival Description. American Archivist 76, no. 2 (Fall/Winter 2013): 567-584.   DOI
39 ICA Experts Group on Archival Description, Records in Context: A Conceptual Model for Archival Description, Consultation Draft v0.1 September 2016, International Council on Archives, Paris, September 2016, pp. 116.
40 ICA EGAD (2018). Semantizing and visualising archival metadata: the PIAAF French prototype online, Florence Clavaud (Archives nationales de France EGAD) 4 May 2018. ICA Experts Group on Archival Description 2017 Annual Meeting - Rome, Italy 23-25 October 2017.
41 Ketelaar, E. (2011). Cultivating Archives, Archival Science 12 (2012) 19-33.   DOI
42 McKemmish, S. (2017). Recordkeeping in the continuum: An Australian tradition. In A. J. Gilliand, S. McKemmish, & A. J. Lau (Eds.), Research in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 122-160). Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.
43 KROENKE (2009). Database Processing 11/E: Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation (Paperback). Pearson Education.
44 Llanes-Padron, D., Pastor-Sanchez, J.A. (2017). Records in contexts: the road of archives to semantic interoperability. Program, Vol. 51 Issue: 4, 387-405.   DOI
45 M. Achichi, R. Bailly, C. Cecconi, M. Destandau, K. Todorov, & R. Troncy. DOREMUS: Doing Reusable Musical Data. In 14th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 2015.
46 Pearson Education (2009). Database Processing 11/E: Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation.
47 Reed, Barbara (2017). New conceptual model for recordkeeping description, Records in Contexts. (2017. 2. 1).
48 Ian, Robinson, Jim, Webber, & Emil, Eifrem (2015). Graph Databases(2nd Edition): New Opportunities for Connected Data. O'Reilly Media.
49 neo4j 블로그(rdbms vs graph datamodeling). 검색일자: 2018.12.31. https://neo4j.com/blog/rdbms-vs-graph-data-modeling/
50 neo4j 홈페이지. 검색일자: 2018.12.31. https://neo4j.com/developer/guide-data-modeling/
51 Records in Contexts - Compendium 홈페이지. 검색일자: 2018.12.31. https://web.esrc.unimelb.edu.au/ICAD/biogs/E000166b.htm: 'RiC Primary Entities: What are they?
52 Records in Contexts - Compendium 홈페이지. 검색일자: 2018.12.31. https://web.esrc.unimelb.edu.au/ICAD/biogs/E000396b.htm: 'RiC Supporting Entities: What are they?
53 PIAAF 프로젝트 홈페이지. 검색일자: 2018.12.31. http://piaaf.demo.logilab.fr/
54 RiC-IM HOME: ICA Records in Context - Compendium. 검색일자: 2018.12.31. https://web.esrc.unimelb.edu.au/ICAD/index.html
55 국가기록원 영구기록물 기술규칙 [NAK 13:2011(v2.0)]. (행정안전부 고시 제2011-42호).