Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.3.001

Oral History Research and Human Subject Research on Bioethics and Safety Law  

Lee, Hosin (한성대학교 크리에이티브인문학부)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / v.17, no.3, 2017 , pp. 1-21 More about this Journal
Abstract
Oral history research is carried out through collecting information about a living person. The data collected from an oral history project is not a mere fact or a mass of information but accounts of persons who reveal their own personalities. For this reason, oral history research and data collection and the use of such data must be based on rigorous ethical standards. The Bioethics and Safety Law shares a similar view on human subject research, and the Institutional Review Boards includes human subject research as a subject of review and management. However, the Bioethics and Safety Law's protection of personalities and human rights focuses on life sciences methodologies, which are not suitable for qualitative research, such as an oral history of a value oriented and critical approach to human beings. This study examines the details of the Bioethics and Safety Law related to human subject research and the problems that may arise when this law is applied to subjects in humanities and social sciences such as oral history. Through this study, alternative methodologies, which can be used for oral history research, while maintaining academic autonomy, are suggested.
Keywords
oral history; oral history resource; Bioethics and Safety Law; Institutional Review Boards; qualitative research;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Christian Joon Park (2016). IRB와 구술사 연구윤리: 한민족다문화 협력적 구술생애사 연구 사례를 중심으로. 구술사연구, 7(2), 133-161. Park, Christian Joon (2016). IRB and Oral History Research Ethics: Focusing on the Collaborative Oral Life History of Hanminjokdamunhwa. Oral History Research, 7(2), 133-161.
2 Hamburger, Philip (2004). The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards. The Supreme Court Review 2004, 271-354.   DOI
3 Oral History Association, n.d. "Information about IRBs" Oral History Association. http://www.oralhistory.org/information-about-irbs/
4 Neuenschwander, John A. (2009). A Guide to Oral History and Law. New York: Oxford Press.
5 Neuenschwander (2016). 구술사의 법적 영향. 도날드 리치 엮음. 현대 구술사 연구의 현장. (손동유 외 옮김). 서울: 선인. (원전 발행년 2010).
6 Shea, Christopher (2000). Don' Talk to the Humans The Crackdown on Social Science Research. Lingua Franca, 10(6), 26-34.
7 Shopes, Linda. n.d. Oral History, Human Subjects, and Institutional Review Boards, Oral History Association. Retrieved July 15, 2017, http://www.oralhistory.org/aboutdo-oral-history/rl-history-and-irb-review
8 Shopes, Linda (2007). Negotiating Institutional Review Board. AHA Perspectives Online, 45, 3. Retrieved January 19, 2017, from https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/march-2007/institutional-review-boards
9 Ward, Alan. n.d. Is your oral history legal and ethical? Retrieved July 7, 2017, from http://concernedhistorians.org
10 개인정보 보호법 (법률 제14107호)
11 윤택림, 함한희 (2006). 새로운 역사 쓰기를 위한 구술사 연구방법론. 서울: 아르케. Yun, Taekrim & Ham, Hanhee (2006). Oral History methodology for writing new history. Seoul: Arche.
12 생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률 (법률 제7150호, 2004.1.29. 제정)
13 생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률 (법률 제14438호, 2016.12.20. 개정)
14 생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률 시행규칙 (보건복지부령 제419호)
15 김시형 등 (2016). 사회행동과학연구의 특성에 따른 심의: 험프리스 연구 사례를 중심으로. 생명윤리, 17(1), 17-33. Kim, Si-hyeong etc (2016). A Review on Character of Social Behavioral Research: Analysis of Humphreys study. Bioethics Journal, 17(1), 17-33.
16 김은애 (2015). 생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률｣에 따른 연구에 대한 기관생명윤리위원회(IRB)의 심의 면제 근거규정에 대한 고찰. 한양법학, 26(2), 43-73. Kim, Eun-Ae (2015). Study on the provisions of the Bioethics and Safety Act related to the exemption of the research review by IRB. Han Yang Law Review, 26(2), 43-73.
17 박윤형, 이얼, 이평수 (2012). 최신 생명윤리법. 서울: 의료정책연구소. Park, Yoonhyung, Lee, Eol, & Lee, Pyongsoo (2012). The Newest Bioethic Law. Seoul: Research Institute for Healthcare Policy.
18 생명윤리정책연구센터 (2010). 생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률 개정 방안 연구. 서울: 생명윤리정책연구센터. Center for Bioethics Policy Research (2010). A study on the revision fo the Bioethics and Safety Law. Seoul: Center for Bioethics Policy Researc.
19 이호신 (2012). 구술자료의 인격적인 권리에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 47-69. Lee, Hosin (2012). A Study on the Issues on Moral Rights of Oral History Resource. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(3), 47-69.
20 이호신 (2017). 구술자료의 수집과 서비스에 대한 개인정보 보호법의 도전. 한국기록관리학회지, 17(1), 193-216. Lee, Hosin (2017). The Challenge of Personal Information Act for Oral History Project. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(1), 193-216.   DOI
21 한국구술사학회 (2017). 연구윤리규정. 한국구술사학회. 검색일자: 2017. 7. 15. http://www.koha2009.or.kr/html/sub3_05.html Korea Oral History Association (2017). Code of Research Ethic. Korea Oral History Association. Retrieved July 14, 2017. http://www.koha2009.or.kr/html/sub3_05.html
22 정향진 (2016). 질적연구와 연구윤리심의. 2016 한국구술사네트워크 워크숍: 구술자료의 윤리적 법적문제에 대한 이해, 47-55. Jung, Hyangjin (2016). Qualitative Research and Research Ethic Review. 2016 Korea Oral History Network Workshop: Understanding legal and ethical issues of oral history resource, 47-55.
23 조홍석 (2014). 생명윤리및안전에관한법률과 기관생명윤리위원회(IRB) 체계. 한양법학, 25(4), 487-502. Cho, Hong-Suck (2014). The System of Korean Bioethics and Safety Act and IRB. Han Yang Law Review, 25(4), 487-502.
24 최병인 (2014). 사회행동과학연구에서의 IRB의 이해. 한국아동학회 학술발표논문집, 7-17. Choe, B. I. (2014). Guidance for Ethical Research Involving Children. Korean Associtation of Child Study, Proceeding for Scholarly Symposium, 7-17.
25 한국연구재단 (2016). 연구윤리 질의응답. 대전: 한국연구재단. Korea Research Foundation (2016). Research ethics question and answer. Daejeon: Korea Research Foundation.