Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.193

The Challenge of Personal Information Act for Oral History Project  

Lee, Hosin (한성대학교 응용인문학부 문헌정보전공)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management / v.17, no.1, 2017 , pp. 193-216 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to understand issues related to the Personal Information Act recently emerging in the field of oral history, and to prepare countermeasures for oral history academics and archives. The Personal Information Act is intended to protect the confidentiality and freedom of the constitutional privacy, and to assure the right to self-determination of information, thereby realizing the dignity and value of the individual. Oral history is intended for living persons; therefore, strict ethical standards are needed to protect the morality of the person behind the sound recordings and appears as the subject of oral history. However, if the uniform application of the Personal Information Act is made, it is a requirement to make the process of consenting and notifying excessively complex and almost impossible to realize, making collection and service of oral history resource improbable. The mechanical and strict application of the Personal Information Act does not come into being because it has the aspect of undermining the inherent intrinsic value of oral history resources and making it difficult to maintain the authenticity of the records. To solve these problems, it is necessary to revise Article 58 (4) of the Personal Information Act of Korea. In addition, it is necessary to establish a guideline for the establishment of independent ethical standards of oral history itself, especially for the protection of the moral rights of third parties.
Keywords
oral history; oral history resource; personal information; protection of personal information; Personal Information Act;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shopes, Linda (2007). Negotiating Institutional Review Board. AHA Perspectives Online, 45, 3 Retrieved January 19, 2017, from https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/march-2007/institutional-review-boards
2 Ward, Alan. Is your oral history legal and ethical? Retrieved January 7, 2017, from http://concernedhistorians.org
3 개인정보 보호법(법률 제14107호)
4 개인정보 보호법 시행령(대통령령 제26776호)
5 개인정보 보호법 시행규칙(행정자치부령 제1호)
6 표준 개인정보보호 지침(행정자치부 고시 제2016-21호)
7 헌재 2005.5.26. 선고. 99헌마513 결정
8 헌재 2005.5.26. 선고. 2004헌마190 결정
9 국가법령정보센터(http://www.law.go.kr)
10 Christian Joon Park (2016). IRB와 구술사 연구 윤리: 한민족다문화 협력적 구술생애사 연구 사례를 중심으로. 구술사연구, 7(2), 133-161.(Park, Christian Joon (2016). IRB and Oral History Research Ethics: Focusing on the Collaborative Oral Life History of Hanminjokdamunhwa. Korean Journal of Oral History, 7(2), 133-161.)
11 권건보 (2014). 정보주체의 개인정보자기결정권. 고학수 (편), 개인정보 보호의 법과 정책 (pp. 3-35). 서울: 박영사.(Kwon, Geon Bo (2014). The right of self-control of Information Subject. Ko, Hak Soo Edit. Law and Policy of Personal Information Protect (pp. 3-35). Seoul: Bakyoungsa.)
12 김일환 (2014). 개인정보보호법 적용대상의 합리화 방안: 법 제58조의 입법론을 중심으로. 공법연구, 43(1), 31-54.(Kim, Il Hwan (2014). Streamlining Plan of Object of Application on the Personal Information Protection Act -Focus on the Legislation Theory of Article 58. Public Law, 43(1), 31-54.)
13 박준석 (2013). 지적재산권법에서 바라본 개인정보 보호. 정보법학, 17(3), 1-40.(Park, Jun-seok (2013). Personal Information from the Perspective of Intellectual Property. Infomedia Law, 17(3), 1-40.)
14 오유석 (2010). 구술사 연구 윤리의 정립과 주요 쟁점. 한국구술사학회, 한양대동시아문화네트워크연구단, 2010년 동계 구술사 워크숍: 구술사 연구기관 네트워크와 연구윤리, 28-38.(Oh, Yoo Seok (2010). Establishment and Major Issues of Oral History Research Ethics. Korean Oral History Association. 2010 Winter Workshop on Oral History: Oral History Institution Network and Research Ethics, 28-38.)
15 이호신 (2010). 구술자료의 저작권 문제에 관한 연구. 구술사연구, 1(1), 49-75.(Lee, Hosin (2010). A Study on Copyright Issues for Oral History Interviews. Korean Journal of Oral History, 1(1), 49-75.)
16 이양호 (2010). 구술채록 윤리강령을 위한 비완결적 제언. 2010년 동계 구술사 워크숍: 구술사 연구기관 네트워크와 연구윤리, 39-43.(Lee, Yang Ho (2010). Non-Completion Recommendations for the Oral History Code of Ethics. Korean Oral History Association. 2010 Winter Workshop on Oral History: Oral History Institution Network and Research Ethics, 39-43.)
17 이창범 (2012). 개인정보 보호법. 서울: 법문사.(Lee, Chang Bum (2012). Personal Information Protection Act. Seoul: Beobmunsa.)
18 이필재 (2014). 개인정보보호법과 관련 법률의 체계 문제. 한국위기관리논집, 10(1), 81-103.(Lee, Phil Jae (2014). System of Personal Information Protection Act and The Related Laws. Korean Review of Crisis & Emergency Management, 10(1), 81-103.)
19 이호신 (2012). 구술자료의 인격적인 권리에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 47-69.(Lee, Hosin (2012). A Study on the Issues on Maral Rights of Oral History Resource. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(3), 47-69.)
20 이희영 (2010). 구술사 연구 윤리에 대한 제언: 과학 연구와 삶의 긴장. 2010년 동계 구술사 워크숍: 구술사 연구기관 네트워크와 연구윤리, 44-45.(Lee, Hee Young (2010). A Propose on Oral History Research Ethics. Korean Oral History Association (2010) Winter Workshop on Oral History: Oral History Institution Network and Research Ethics, 44-45.)
21 행정안전부 (2011). 개인정보 보호법령 및 지침.고시 해설. 서울: 행정안전부.(Ministry of Public Administration and Safety (2011). Personal Information Protection Laws,Guidlines and Notices. Seoul: Ministry of Public Administration and Safety.)
22 Neuenschwander, John A. (2009). A Guide to Oral History and Law. New York: Oxford Press.