Inflow Conditions for Modelling the Neutral Equilibrium ABL Based on Standard k-ε Model |
Jinghan Wang
(Harbin Institute of Technology)
Chao Li (Harbin Institute of Technology) Yiqing Xiao (Harbin Institute of Technology) Jinping ou (Harbin Institute of Technology) |
1 | Jones, W.P., Launder, B.E., 1972. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 15, 301-314. DOI |
2 | Juretic, F., Kozmar, H., 2013. Computational modeling of the neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer flow using the standard k-ε turbulence model. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 115, 112-120. DOI |
3 | Juretic, F., Kozmar, H., 2014. Computational modeling of the atmospheric boundary layer using various two-equation turbulence models. Wind Struct. 19, 687-708. DOI |
4 | Kader, B.A., 1981. Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 24, 1541-1544. DOI |
5 | Launder, B.E., Spalding, D.B., 1974. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 3, 269-289. DOI |
6 | Longo, R., Ferrarotti, M., Sanchez, C.G., Derudi, M., Parente, A., 2017. Advanced turbulence models and boundary conditions for flows around different configurations of ground-mounted buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 167, 160-182. DOI |
7 | O' Sullivan, J.P., Archer, R.A., Flay, R.G.J., 2011. Consistent boundary conditions for flows within the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 99, 65-77. DOI |
8 | Parente, A., Gorle, C., van Beeck, J., Benocci, C., 2011a. A Comprehensive Modelling Approach for the Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer: Consistent Inflow Conditions, Wall Function and Turbulence Model. Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 140, 411-428. DOI |
9 | Parente, A., Gorle, C., van Beeck, J., Benocci, C., 2011b. Improved k-ε model and wall function formulation for the RANS simulation of ABL flows. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 99, 267-278. DOI |
10 | Peralta, C., Nugusse, H., Kokilavani, S.P., Schmidt, J., Stoevesandt, B., 2014. Validation of the simpleFoam (RANS) solver for the atmospheric boundary layer in complex terrain. EDP Sciences, |
11 | Richards, P.J., Hoxey, R.P., 1993. Appropriate Engineering Boundary Conditions For Computational Wind Models Using The k-ε Turbulence Model. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 145-153. |
12 | Richards, P.J., Norris, S.E., 2011. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models revisited. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 99, 257-266. DOI |
13 | Richards, P.J., Norris, S.E., 2015. Appropriate boundary conditions for a pressure driven boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 142, 43-52. DOI |
14 | Riddle, A., Carruthers, D., Sharpe, A., McHugh, C., Stocker, J., 2004. Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modelling. Atmos. Environ. 38, 1029-1038. DOI |
15 | Sumner, J., Masson, C., 2012. k-ε simulations of the neutral atmospheric boundary layer: analysis and correction of discretization errors on practical grids. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl. 70, 724-741. DOI |
16 | Wilcox, D.C., 1998. Turbulence modeling for CFD. DCW industries La Canada, CA, |
17 | Yan, B.W., Li, Q.S., He, Y.C., Chan, P.W., 2015. RANS simulation of neutral atmospheric boundary layer flows over complex terrain by proper imposition of boundary conditions and modification on the k-ε model. Environ. Fluid Mech. 16, 1-23. |
18 | Yang, W., Quan, Y., Jin, X., Tamura, Y., Gu, M., 2008. Influences of equilibrium atmosphere boundary layer and turbulence parameter on wind loads of low-rise buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 96, 2080-2092. DOI |
19 | Yang, Y., Xie, Z., Gu, M., 2017. Consistent inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer for the SST k-omega model. Wind Struct. 24, 465-480. DOI |
20 | Yang, Y., Gu, M., Chen, S., Jin, X., 2009. New inflow boundary conditions for modelling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in computational wind engineering. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 97, 88-95. DOI |
21 | Yu, H., The, J., 2017. Simulation of gaseous pollutant dispersion around an isolated building using the k-ω SST (shear stress transport) turbulence model. J. Air Waste Manage. 67, 517-536. DOI |
22 | Cai, X., Huo, Q., Kang, L., Song, Y., 2014. Equilibrium Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Flow: Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation with Balanced Forces. Bound.-Lay. Meteorol. 152, 349-366. DOI |
23 | Balogh, M., Parente, A., 2015. Realistic boundary conditions for the simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flows using an improved k-ε model. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 144, 183-190. DOI |
24 | Balogh, M., Parente, A., Benocci, C., 2012. RANS simulation of ABL flow over complex terrains applying an Enhanced k-ε model and wall function formulation: Implementation and comparison for fluent and OpenFOAM. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 104-106, 360-368. DOI |
25 | Blocken, B., Carmeliet, J., Stathopoulos, T., 2007. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings-effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 95, 941-962. DOI |
26 | Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., Carmeliet, J., 2007. CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems. Atmos. Environ. 41, 238-252. DOI |
27 | Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., van Beeck, J.P.A.J., 2016. Pedestrian-level wind conditions around buildings: Review of wind-tunnel and CFD techniques and their accuracy for wind comfort assessment. Build. Environ. 100, 50-81. DOI |
28 | Gorle, C., van Beeck, J., Rambaud, P., Van Tendeloo, G., 2009. CFD modelling of small particle dispersion: The influence of the turbulence kinetic energy in the atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos. Environ. 43, 673-681. DOI |
29 | Hargreaves, D.M., Wright, N.G., 2007. On the use of the k-model in commercial CFD software to model the neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 95, 355-369. DOI |
30 | Hu, P., Li, Y., Cai, C.S., Liao, H., Xu, G.J., 2013. Numerical simulation of the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer using the SST k-ω turbulence model. Wind Struct. 17, 87-105. DOI |