Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2022.25.1.11

Reviewing the Candidate Types for Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures for Post-2020 Management Related to National Protected Areas System  

Shim, Yun-Jin (Dep. of Landscape Architecture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
Sung, Jung-Won (Dep. of Landscape Architecture, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
Lee, Kyeong-Cheol (Dep. of Forestry, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
Kweon, Hyeong-Keun (Dep. of Forestry, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
Hong, Yong-Sik (Korea Arboreta and Gardens Institute)
Kang, Shin-Gu (Korea Arboreta and Gardens Institute)
An, Jong-Bin (DMZ Botanic Garden, Korea National Arboretum)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.25, no.1, 2022 , pp. 11-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to systematically review the candidate types for OECMs suitable for domestic conditions in areas related to the Korea Forest Service in order to achieve the goal of establishing the protected areas and OECMs system required by Post-2020 GBF, and to provide basic data for the establishment of the national protected areas system. As a result of the study, the selection criteria for OECMs were presented, and it was found that arboretums·botanical gardens, Natural Recreation Forests, and air holes may correspond to the Candidate Types for OECMs. As a result of evaluating the possible areas for OECMs based on the OECMs selection criteria, in the case of arboretums·botanical gardens, it is judged that only conservation areas can be designated as OECMs, except for areas mainly used by visitors of arboretums·botanical gardens that fall under the BGCI conservation type among national and public arboretums·botanical gardens. However, private and school arboretums·botanical gardens have personal property ownership, so it was judged to have no effective measures to control activities that may adversely affect biodiversity, which showed limitations in designation of OECMs. Natural Recreation Forests was found to meet the OECMs selection criteria. However, private forests have personal property ownership, which limits the designation of OECMs. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the function of in-situ conservation in order to meet the OECMs for private and school arboretums·botanical gardens, and private forests that have personal property ownership. To this end, effective measures are needed to achieve biodiversity conservation outcomes, and it is judged that legal control and corresponding support policies (incentives) are needed. In the case of air holes, for sustainable conservation, the management boundary of air holes should be clearly defined based on the preparation of laws and guidelines related to air holes. In addition, it is judged that it is desirable to designate the competent local forest office as the management authority and conduct periodic detailed surveys of air holes, establish and implement the conservation plans based on those.
Keywords
Aichi Biodiversity Targets; Biodiversity; Effective Management; GSPC(Global Strategy for Plant Conservation) 2030; Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework; Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kong WS .Yoon KH.Kim IT .Lee YM and Oh SH. 2012. Spatial Distributional Characteristics of Wind-Hole and Governance Strategy. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 21(3): 431-443. (in Korean with English summary)   DOI
2 https://www.law.go.kr (National Law Information Center)
3 Woodley, S. .B. Bertzky .N. Crawhall .N. Dudley .J.M. Londonno .K. MacKinnon .K. Redford and T. Sandwith. 2012. Meeting Aichi Target 11 : What does success look like for protected area system? Parks 18: 23-36.
4 https://www.korea.kr/news/pressReleaseView.do?newsId=156389500
5 Seo KS. 2012. A Study on Improving the Utilization of Recreational Forest. Ph.D. dissertation, Kangwon National University. (in Korean with English summary)
6 CBD(Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. COP 10 Decision X/2 : Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.
7 Heo HY.Cho DG .Shim YJ .Ryu YJ .Hong JP and Shim GW. 2017. A Study on the Expanding Protected Areas through Identifying Potential Protected Areas. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 31(6): 586-594. (in Korean with English summary)   DOI
8 Heo HY. 2020. A Review on the International Trends for Establishing Post-2020 National Targets Relevant to Protected Areas. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 34(6): 601-609. (in Korean with English summary)   DOI
9 Hong JP .Shim YJ and Heo HY. 2017a. A Study on Aichi Biodiversity Target 11. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(5):43-58. (in Korean with English summary)
10 Hong JP .Shim YJ and Heo HY. 2017b. Identifying Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures for Expanding National Protected Areas. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 20(6):79-91. (in Korean with English summary)
11 IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs. 2019. Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
12 http://www.kdpa.kr (KOREA Database on Protected Areas)(2021.12.14.)
13 Kong WS .Lee SG .Yoon KH and Park HN. 2011. Environmental Characteristics of Wind-Hole and Phytogeographical Values. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 20(3): 1-10. (in Korean with English summary)
14 Korea National Arboretum. 2013. Air Holes in Korea. (in Korean)
15 Laffoley, D. .N. Dudley .H. Jonas .D. MacKinnon .K. MacKinnon .M. Hockings and S. Woodley. 2017. 'An introduction to "other effective area-based conservation measures" under Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity: origin, interpretation and some emerging ocean issues'. Journal of Aquatic Conservation 27(Supplement 1): 130-137.   DOI
16 https://nifos.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?nttId=3145209&bbsId=BBSMSTR_1036&pageUnit=10&pageIndex=3&searchtitle=title&searchcont=&searchkey=&searchwriter=&searchWrd=&ctgryLrcls=&ctgryMdcls=&ctgrySmcls=&ntcStartDt=&ntcEndDt=&mn=NKFS_01_01&orgId=
17 https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/cms/cmsView.do?mn=NKFS_03_01_01_01&cmsId=FC_001349
18 CBD. 2018. Protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (Decision 14/8). https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-08-en.pdf.
19 Heo HY and Kwon HG. 2012. Review on the Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Evaluation in Korea. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 16(4): 41-57. (in Korean with English summary)
20 Hong JP. 2017. A Study on Improving the National Protected Areas System: Focusing on Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures. Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
21 Dudley, N.(Ed.). 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Iucn.
22 Kang SK. 2012. A study on the classification and management measures of arboreta in Korea. Ph.D. dissertation, Kyungpook National University. (in Korean with English summary)