Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2020.23.4.13

An Analysis of Environmental Policy Effect on Green Space Change using Logistic Regression Model : The Case of Ulsan Metropolitan City  

Lee, Sung-Joo (Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Graduate School of Korea University)
Ryu, Ji-Eun (Incheon climate & Environmental research center, the Incheon Institute)
Jeon, Seong-Woo (Dept. of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.23, no.4, 2020 , pp. 13-30 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the qualitative and quantitative effects of environmental policies in terms of green space management using logistic regression model(LRM). Landsat satellite imageries in 1985, 1992, 2000, 2008, and 2015 are classified using a hybrid-classification method. Based on these classified maps, logistic regression model having a deforestation tendency of the past is built. Binary green space change map is used for the dependent variable and four explanatory variables are used: distance from green space, distance from settlements, elevation, and slope. The green space map of 2008 and 2015 is predicted using the constructed model. The conservation effect of Ulsan's environmental policies is quantified through the numerical comparison of green area between the predicted and real data. Time-series analysis of green space showed that restoration and destruction of green space are highly related to human activities rather than natural land transition. The effect of green space management policy was spatially-explicit and brought a significant increase in green space. Furthermore, as a result of quantitative analysis, Ulsan's environmental policy had effects of conserving and restoring 111.75㎢ and 175.45㎢ respectively for the periods of eight and fifteen years. Among four variables, slope was the most determinant factor that accounts for the destruction of green space in the city. This study presents logistic regression model as a way of evaluating the effect of environmental policies that have been practiced in the city. It has its significance in that it allows us a comprehensive understanding of the effect by considering every direct and indirect effect from other domains, such as air and water, on green space. We conclude discussing practicability of implementing environmental policy in terms of green space management with the focus on a non-statutory plan.
Keywords
Green Space; Logistic Regression model; Environmental Policy Assessment; Image Classification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abreu, A.L.S., Oliveira Gaspar, R., Oliveira Lima, M.B., Nappo, M.E. and Trondoli, E.A.. 2017. Use of Logistic Regression Model for Prediction of Non-Timber Forest Products. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 8 : 2847-2859.   DOI
2 Ali Akbar Jafarzadeh and Saleh Arekhi. 2012. Analyze and Predict Processes of Deforestation using Logistic Regression and GIS (a case study of northern ilam forests, ilam province, Iran). Elixir Agriculture. 44 : 7104-7111.
3 Amiya Gyaen and Sunil Saha. 2018. Deforestation Probable Area Predicted by Logistic Regression in Pathro River Basin: a Tributary of Ajay River. Spatial Information Research. 26(1) : 1-9   DOI
4 Anneli Jalkanen and Ulla Matiila. 2000. Logistic regression models for wind and snow damage in northern Finland based on the National Forest Inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management. 135 : 315-330.   DOI
5 Baek SA.Cho KH.Hwang JS.Jung DH.Park JW.Choi BK and Cha DS. 2016. Assessment of Slope Failures Potential in Forest Roads uisng a Logistic Regression Model. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 105(4) : 429-434. (In Korean with English Summary)   DOI
6 Biswajit Nath. 2014. Quantitative Assessment of Forest Cover Change of a Part of Bandarban Hill Tracts Using NDVI Techniques. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2(1) : 21-27.
7 Cho YH and Jo HK. 2002. A Study on Effects of Vegetation Cover on Atmospheric Purification in Seoul, Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 5(4) : 51-60. (In Korean with English Summary)
8 C. Kamusoko and M. Aniya. 2009. Hybrid classification of Landsat data and GIS for land use/cover change analysis of the Bindura district, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 30(1) : 97-115.   DOI
9 C.P. Lo Corresponding author and Choi JM. 2004. A hybrid approach to urban land use/cover mapping using Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) images. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 25(14) : 2687-2700.   DOI
10 Chae BG.Kim WY.Cho YC.Kim KS.Lee CO and Choi YS. 2004. Development of a Logistic Regression Model for Probabilistic Prediction of Debris Flow. The Journal of Engineering Geology. 14(2) : 211-222. (In Korean with English Summary)
11 Eastman J.R. 2006. IDRISI 15 Andes. Guide to GIS and image processing. Clark University, Worcester, MA.
12 Haldn Akoglu. 2018. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine. 18 : 91-93.   DOI
13 Elizabeth A. Freeman and Gretchen G. Moisen. 2008. A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa. Ecological Modelling. 217 : 48-58.   DOI
14 Freeman, E. and Moisen G. 2008. Presence Absence: an R package for presence-absence analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 23 : 11.
15 Green, R.H. 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental biologists. Wiley, New York.
16 Lee BD and Kim KH. 2013. Development of Large Fire Judgement Model Using Logistic Regression Equation. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 102(3) : 415-419. (In Korean with English Summary)
17 Hensher, D.A. and Johnson, L.W. 1981. Applied Discrete Choice Modelling. Croom Helm, London.
18 Hong SY.Rim SK.Lee SH.Lee JC and Kim YH. 2008. Spatial Analysis of AgroEnvironment of North Korea Using Remote Sensing. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture. 27(2) : 120-132. (In Korean with English Summary)   DOI
19 Kim SJ.Lee JC.Kim JS and Roh TH. 2014. A Comparative Analysis of Landslide Susceptibility Using Airborne LiDAR and Digital Map. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography. 21(4-1) : 281-292. (In Korean with English Summary)
20 Lee SH.Suh JH and Cho HJ. 2014. Outcomes and Evaluations of Ulsan Eco-city Model. Journal of Environmental Science International. 23(6) : 1111-1120. (In Korean with English Summary)   DOI
21 Lee SY.Kim JH.Won JY and Park HS. 2006. Ulsan Eco-Industrial Park Development by Promotion of Industrial Symbiosis. Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. 12 : 578-583. (In Korean)
22 Park MS and Youn YC. 2017. Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea. Forest Policy and Economics. 76 : 45-55.   DOI
23 Ludeke, A. K..Maggio, R.C. and Reid, L.M. 1990. An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS. Journal of Environmental Management. 31 : 247-159.   DOI
24 M. PIR Bavaghar. 2015. Deforestation modelling using logistic regression and GIS. Journal of forest science. 61(5) : 193-199.   DOI
25 Menard S. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Sage University paper series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences. 106 : 98.
26 Ministry of Environment(MOE). 2014. A Research on Planting Plan of Green Buffer Zone Near the National Industrial Complex in Ulsan city. (In Korean)
27 Park MS and Youn YC. 2013. Development of urban forest policy-making toward governance in the Republic of Korea. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12 : 273-281.   DOI
28 Rakesh Kumar.S. Nandy.Reshu Agarwal and S.P.S. Kushwaha. 2014. Forest cover dynamics analysis and prediction modelling using logistic regression model. Ecological Indicator. 45 : 444-455.   DOI
29 Stephanie Manel and Steve J. Ormerod. 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: The need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology. 38 : 921-931.   DOI
30 Sung OH. 2001. Aplied Logistic Regression Analysis. Tamjin. Seoul. 334. (In Korean)
31 Ulsan Development Institute (UDI). 2008. Ecopolis Ulsan Modification Plan. (In Korean)
32 Linkie M..Smith R.J. and Leader-Williams N. 2004. Mapping and predicting deforestation patterns in the lowlands of Sumatra. Biodiversity Conservation. 13 : 1809-1818.   DOI
33 Ulsan Metropolitan City(UMC). 2008. White Paper of Environment. (In Korean)
34 Ulsan Development Institute (UDI). 2013. Performance Analysis on Ulsan Green Growth policy and Improvement Plan. (In Korean)
35 Ulsan Development Institute (UDI). 2014. 10 years after the declaration of Ecopolis Ulsan policy, Achievements and Assessments. Issue Report. (In Korean)
36 Ulsan Metropolitan City(UMC). 2003. The second Medium-term Environmental Conservation Plan(2004-2008). (In Korean)
37 Ulsan Metropolitan City(UMC). 2005. The second Natural Environment Conservation Action Plan(2005-2009). (In Korean)
38 Ulsan Metropolitan City(UMC). 2008. The third Medium-term Environmental Conservation Plan(2009-2013). (In Korean)
39 X. Yang and C.P. Lo. 2002. Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 23(9) : 1775-1798.   DOI
40 Yeon YK. 2011. Evaluation and Analysis of Gwangwon-do Landslide Susceptibility using Logistic Regression. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies. 14(4) : 116-127. (In Korean with English Summary)   DOI
41 Yoon YH. 2003. Air Temperature Variation by Effect of Green Space Condition. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 6(1) : 28-33. (In Korean with English Summary)