Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2020.23.1.49

A Basic Research for the Development of Habitat Suitability Index Model of Pelophylax chosenicus  

Shim, Yun-Jin (Group Han Associates)
Kim, Sun-Ryoung (Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology)
Yoon, Kwang-Bae (Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology)
Jung, Jin-Woo (Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology)
Park, Seon-Uk (Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology)
Park, Yong-Su (Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.23, no.1, 2020 , pp. 49-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted as a basic study to develop the HSI(Habitat Suitability Index) model of Pelophylax chosenicus based on the research on the ecological and habitat status of Pelophylax chosenicus and the literature research on the HSI model. The habitat variables of Pelophylax chosenicus are the altitude of the spawning pond, the habitat area, the distance from wetland, the soil(aptitude grade for paddy field), the place for eating such as paddy field and wetlands(land cover) and the distance from Predator(Lithobates catesbeianus) distribution area. Based on the existing literature of Pelophylax chosenicus, the results of field surveys and expert opinions, the SI(Suitability Index) model and HSI model were developed and applied to the site to examine the applicability of the HSI model. As a result of application, SI 4 and SI 5 with varying SI values seem to have a major influence on the HSI. In addition, it is considered that the HSI model is an arithmetic mean of SI models, which has a major impact on HSI. The HSI model can be an important basis for the habitat evaluation and restoration model of Pelophylax chosenicus. In particular, it is highly applicable to the selection and evaluation of alternative habitats for Pelophylax chosenicus.
Keywords
Alternative Habitats; Amphibians; Ecological Restoration; Endangered Species; Habitat Evaluation Procedure(HEP);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Park HR. KS Koo. SM Park. HJ Kang. JH Choi and HC Sung. 2019. Move Distance and Home Range of American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus). Proceedings of the Korean Society of Herpetologists Conference 12 : 13. (in Korean)
2 Ra NY. 2010. Habitat and Behavioral Characteristics, Captive Breeding and Recovery Strategy of the Endangered Gold-Spotted Pond Frog(Rana plancyi chosenica). Ph.D dissertation, Kangwon National University. (in Korean with English summary)
3 Ra NY. JH Lee and DS Park. 2007. Growth of Golden Frog Larvae, Rana plancyi chosencia by Different Food Tyoes. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 25(1) : 8-15. (in Korean with English summary)
4 Shim YJ. 2004. A study on the site selection of wetland replacement using Korean redfrog (Runa amurensis coreana Okada) habitat suitability index: focusing on Pangyo residential development site. Master's Thesis, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
5 Shim YJ. DG Cho. S Park. DJ Lee. YH Seo. SH Kim. DH Kim. SB Ko. JY Cha and HC Sung. 2014. Development of Habitat Suitability Index for Habitat Restoration of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis). J. Korea Env. Res. Tech. 17(2) : 109-123. (in Korean with English summary)
6 Shim YJ. DG Cho. JP Hong. DH Kim. YS Park and HC Sung. 2015. Site Selection of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis) Habitat Restoration Using Habitat Suitability Index. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 18(2) : 33-44. (in Korean with English summary)
7 Sung HC. SM Cha. SK Cheong. DS Park and SR Park. 2007a. Monitoring local populations and breeding migration patterns of the Gold-spotted Pond Frog, Rana plancyi chosenica. Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 30(2) : 121-126.
8 Oldham, R. S.. J. Keeble. M. J. S. Swan and M. Jeffcote. 2000. Evaluating the suitability of habitat for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Herpetological Journal, 10(4) : 143-156.
9 Yang SY. JB Kim. MS Min and JH Suh. 1999. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Two Korean Pond Frog Species, Rana nigromaculata and R. plancyi (Anura, Ranidae), with a Survey of Temporal Genetic Variation in R. nigromaculata. Korean journal of biological sciences 3(3) : 275-284. (in Korean with English summary)   DOI
10 Yang SY. JB Kim. MS Min. JH Suh and YJ Kang. 2001. Monograph of Korean amphibia. Academy Book, Seoul, South Korea. Homepage of the Korean DAPTF.
11 Yoon IB. JI Kim and SY Yang. 1998. Study on the food hatibs of Rana nigromaculata Hallowell and Rana plancyi chosenica Okada(Salientia;Ranidae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 16(2) : 69-76. (in Korean with English summary)
12 Lee BE. JW Kim. NI Kim and JG Kim. 2017. Evaluation on Replacement Habitat of Two Endangered Species, Aster altaicus var. uchiyamae and Polygonatum stenophyllum Using Habitat Suitability Index. Journal of Wetlands Research 19(4) : 433-442. (in Korean with English summary)   DOI
13 http://map.ngii.go.kr
14 https://egis.me.go.kr
15 https://soil.rda.go.kr
16 Lee SC. 2004. Study on In-situ and Ex-situ, and Restoration Strategy Planning for the Protected Wildlife Anura (Rana plancyi chosenica Okada) in Korea. Master's Thesis, University of Incheon. (in Korean with English summary)
17 Matsui, M. 2004. Pelophylax chosenicus. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1.
18 Min MS. SK Park. J Che. DS Park and H Lee. 2008. Genetic Diversity among Local Populations of the Gold-spotted Pond Frog, Rana plancyi chosenica(Amphibia: Ranidae), Assessed by Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene and Control Region Sequences. Korean journal of systematic zoology 24(1) : 25-32.
19 National Institute of Biolocgical Resources (NIBR). 2018. Endangered species at a glance. (in Korean)
20 National Institute of Ecology(NIE). 2018. Guidelines for Creating Alternative Habitats of Pelophylax chosenicus. (in Korean)
21 Tole, L. 2006. Choosing reserve sites probabilistically: A Colombian Amazon case study. Journal of Ecological Modelling 194(4) : 344-356.   DOI
22 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1980. Habitat as a basis for environmental assessment. Ecological Services Manual, 101.
23 Vitt, L. J.. J. P. Caldwell. H. M. Wilbur and D. C. Smith. 1990. Amphibians as harbingers of decay. BioScience 40 : 418.   DOI
24 Cheong SK. DS Park. HC Sung. JH Lee and SR Park. 2007. Skeletochronological Age Determination and Comparative Demographic Analysis of Two Populations of the Gold-spotted Pond Frog (Rana chosenica). Journal of Ecology and Field Biology 30(1) : 57-62.
25 Wake, D. B. and V. T. Vredenburg. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences of United States America 105(1) : 11466-11473.   DOI
26 Wyman R. L. 1990. What's happening to the amphibians? Conservation Biology. 4 : 350-352.   DOI
27 Yang SY. 1978. Check list of Korean amphibians. Inha University IIR(5) : 81-90. (in Korean)
28 Cheong SW. HC Sung. DS Park and SR Park. 2009. Population Viability Analysis of a Gold-spotted Pond Frog(Rana chosenica) Population: Implications for Effective Conservation and Re-introduction. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 27(1) : 73-81. (in Korean with English summary)
29 Cho GY. 2017. A Study on the Restoration Model for "Bufo gargarizans" Habitat Using HSI (Habitat Suitability Index): Focused On Wonheung-ee Small Reservoirs Replacement Habitat. Master's Thesis, Sangmyung University. (in Korean with English summary)
30 Sung HC. SM Cha. SK Kim. DS Park. SR Park and SK Cheong. 2007b. Monitoring extensive breeding populations and daily call activity of the gold-spotted pond frog, Rana plancyi chosenica in Chungju City and Chungwon Gun. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 25(2) : 94-99. (in Korean with English summary)
31 ChungNam Institute(CNI). 2015. Habitat Evaluation Procedures Manual. Paju: Hanul Publishing Group. (in Korean)
32 Gascon, C. 2007. Amphibian conservation action plan: proceedings IUCN/SSC Amphibian Conservation Summit 2005. IUCN.
33 Kei, N.. J. i. Shiraiwa and S. Kazama. 2011. Evaluation of seasonal habitat variations of fresh water fishes, fireflies, and frogs using a habitat suitability index model that includes river water temperature. Journal of Ecological Modelling 222(21) : 3718-3726.   DOI
34 Gibson, L. A.. B. A. Wilson. D. M. Cahill and J. Hill. 2004. Modelling habitat suitability of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) in the coastal heathlands of southern Victoria, Australia, Biological Conservation. 117(2) : 143-150.   DOI
35 Graves, B. M. and S. H. Anderson. 1987. Habitat suitability index models: bullfrog. Research report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 82/10.138.
36 Heyer, W. R.. M. A. Donnelly. R. W. McDiarmid. L. A. C. Hayek and M. S. Foster. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for amphibians. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 1-15.
37 Kim S. AH Eom. DS Park and NY Ra. 2008. Detection of infectious fungal diseases of frogs inhabiting in Korea. Mycobiology 36(1) : 10-12.   DOI
38 Kim S. MY Sim. AH Eom. D Park and NY Ra. 2009. PCR Detection of Ranavirus in gold-spotted pond frogs(Rana plancyi chosenica) from Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 27(1) : 110-113.
39 Kim SR. JH Lee. JY Song. MH Chang. HC Sung and DG Cho. 2013. A Study on the Habitat Restoration Model for Chinemys reevesii. J. Korea Env. Res. Tech. 16(2) : 115-125. (in Korean with English summary)