Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.5.049

The Landscape Ecological Management System (LEMS) for Assessing the Landscape Ecological Performance of Urban Developments  

Oh, Kyushik (Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University)
Lee, Dongwoo (Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.15, no.5, 2012 , pp. 49-67 More about this Journal
Abstract
Studies on landscape ecology have focused on conceptual aspects, while empirical focus for spatial planning has been rarely conducted. This study conducted an empirical analysis to enhance landscape ecological performance of urban developments using landscape ecology. To do so, concrete criteria and standards to analyze structural, functional and variational mechanisms of urban landscape ecology were developed. An integrated landscape ecology assessment model that can be applied to urban development planning was established by combining the criteria. Next, Landscape Ecological Management System (LEMS) was developed to implement an integrated assessment using GIS. To verify the effectiveness of the system, a case study was conducted using LEMS on Byulnae City in the Seoul Metropolitan Area. The LEMS can be useful for urban planners and policy makers in their selection of desirable planning alternatives. Moreover, the LEMS developed in this study can be a useful tool for academia in terms of the implementation of further related studies, and for planning professionals in their environmental impact assessment tasks.
Keywords
Landscape Ecology; Urban development; Integrated Assessment; GIS;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mortberg, U.M, B. Balfors, and W.C. Knol. 2007 Landscape ecological assessment : A tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning. Journal of Environmental Management 82 : 457-470.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 김대현․김대수․주신하․오서래. 2003. 도시의 토지이용 형태별 경관특성과 유형-대전광역시를 사례로. 한국조경학회지 33(4) : 20-30.
3 김희주․오규식․이동근. 2011. 공간자기상관분석을 통한 시계열적 경관구조의 변화 분석. 환경복원녹화 14(3) : pp. 1-14.
4 사공정희․나정화. 2005. 녹지 잠재 영향권역 설정을 통한 녹지단절구역 분류 및 우선순위선정. 한국조경학회지 33(2) : 1-15.
5 오규식․이동우․정승현․박창석. 2009. 도시 생태네트워크 설정을 위한 공간의사결정지원체계에 관한 연구-경관생태학 이론을 기반으로. 한국 GIS학회지 17(3) : 251-259.
6 오정학․정성관․권진오․박경훈. 2007. 경관생태학적 유역관리를 위한 토지이용 유형 분류. 한국지리정보학회지 10(4) : 22-34.
7 이도원. 2001. 경관생태학. 서울대학교출판부.
8 이동근․김명수․구본학․김경훈․김동성․나정화․윤소원․이명우․전성우․정흥락․조경두․제종길․홍선기. 2005. 경관생태학. 보문당.
9 이동근․김은영. 2008. 수도권 내 개발계획관련요소와 산림파편화 관계분석을 통한 관리방안. 한국조경학회지 35(6) : 37-47.
10 이동근․송원경․전성우. 2008. 경관투과성 및 최소비용경로 분석을 통한 수도권 지역의 광역생태축 구축 연구. 환경복원녹화 11(3) : 94-106.
11 이동근․윤소원․김은영․최재용. 2005. 보전가치평가를 위한 경관생태학적 지표의 활용 및 적용. 환경복원녹화 32(6) : 14-22.
12 이상헌․오규식. 2010. 셀룰라 오토마타를 이용한 개발제한구역의 효과 분석. 국토계획 45(3) : 193-209.
13 조용현. 2000. 경관지수를 이용한 지역생태계 평가. 환경영향평가 9(4) : 349-362.
14 http://www.clarklabs.org
15 http://www.umass.edu
16 http://www.moleg.go.kr
17 Adriaensen, F., J.P Chardon, D. De Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villaba, H. Gulinck, and E. Matthysen. 2003. The application of leastcost modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 : 233-247.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Cook, E.A. 2002. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning 58 : 269-280.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron. 1986. Lanscape ecology, New York : John wiley & Sonns.
20 Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Land mosaics : The ecology of landscape and regions. New York : Cambridge University Press.
21 Getis, A. and T.K. Ord. 1992. The Analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographic Analysis 24(3) : 189-257.
22 Singelton, P. H., W.L. Gaines and J.F. Lehmkuhl. 2002. Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington; A geographic information system weighted-distance and leastcost corridor assessment. United States Department of Agriculture, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
23 Knaapen, J.P., M. Scheff and B. Harins. 1992, Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 23 : 1-16.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Reynolds, K.M. and P.F. Hessburg, 2005. Decision support for integrated landscape evaluation and restoring planning 207 : 263-278.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Schonewald-Cox, C.M. 1983. Guidelines to management : A beginning attempt. In Rechard B. Primack. 1993, Essentials of Conservation Biology, Sunderland, Messachusetts : Sinauer Associates.
26 Termorshuizen, J.W. and P. Opdam. 2009. Landscape services as a brigde between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 24 : 1037-1052.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Turner, M.G. 1990. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns, Landscape Ecology 4(1) : 21-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Turner, M. G.․R. H. Gardner and R. V. O'nell. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer Science Business Media.
29 Wong, D.W.S and J. Lee, 2005, Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
30 Wu, Jianguo and R. Hobbs. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology : An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17 : 355-365.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Zhang, L. and H. Wang. 2006. Planning an Ecological Network of Xiamen Island (China) using Landscape Metrics and Network Analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 78 : 449-456.   DOI   ScienceOn