Browse > Article

Floral Changes During Three Years After Cheonggyecheon Restoration  

Kim, Hyeong-Guk (Ecosystem Assessment Division, National Institute of Environmental Research)
Koo, Bon-Hak (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Sang Myung University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology / v.13, no.6, 2010 , pp. 107-115 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was surveyed to identify changes of flora during three years after restoration in Cheonggyecheon stream. There are four sections in Cheonggyecheon. One and two sections are upper streams and three and four sections are down streams. It was surveyed 328 species in 2006. In 2007 and 2008, 446 and 444 species were found, respectively. This result shows that Cheonggyecheon is unstable initial condition in restored stream ecosystem. Naturalized species were 58 species in 2006 and it was respectively 61 and 63 species in 2007 and 2008. Hazard species of ecosystem were three common species during survey period. In appearance of flora per section, three and four sections constituted by natural sites such as point bars, wide flood plains, riffles and ponds, marshes, etc. were surveyed more species than one and two constructed by concrete materials and narrow flow channel. Recently, as time goes by, introduced species are being increased. And succession has mainly been progressed by one year or binary herbs and perennial herbs. Compared with other restored streams, Cheonggyecheon showed more flora than Yangjaecheon and Anyangcheon. It is judged owing to length of surveyed site, various planted species and area of inhabitation space. To manage restored stream ecosystem, monitoring is essential. Further, because change of vegetation after restoration in Cheonggyecheon is very important, continuous monitoring about Flora and Naturalized species and Hazard species of ecosystem is also very important.
Keywords
Introduced Species; Planting Species; Naturalized Species; Ecosystem; Succession;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 奧田重俊, 佐木寧. 1996. 河川環境と水邊植物-植生保全管理-.
2 청계천홈페이지. http://cheonggye.seoul.go.kr/
3 환경부 국립환경과학원. 한국의 외래식물 종합검색 시스템. http://alienplant.nier.go.kr/
4 임양재.전의식. 1980. 한반도의 귀화식물 분포. 한국식물학회지 23(3-4):69-83.
5 전승훈.차윤정.최정권. 2000. 여의도 샛강 생태공원의 조성 후 3 년간의 식물상 변화. 한국조경학회지 28(5):76-86.
6 정진아.김혜주.이은희. 2004. 직강화 하천구간과 자연형 하천복원구간의 식물상 및 출현빈도 비교:불광천을 사례로. 한국환경생태학회지 18(1):61-74.   과학기술학회마을
7 최정권. 1997. 도시하천에서 자연형 저수로 호안 공법의 적용과 식생복원 모니터링. -서울시양재천의 학여울 구간을 사례로-. 한국환경생태학회지 11(2):201-213.
8 환경부. 2002. 하천복원가이드라인.
9 안영희.송종석. 2003. 안성천 하천변 식물상 구성과 환경 조건과의 관계. 한국환경과학회지 12(6):573-582.   과학기술학회마을
10 안양시. 2007. 2006년 안양천 모니터링 연구.
11 이영노. 1996. 한국식물원색도감. 교학사.
12 이유미.박수현.정승선. 2002. 서울 중랑천의 식생구성과 식물상. 한국환경생태학회지 16(3):271-286.   과학기술학회마을
13 김준민.임양재.전의식. 2000. 한국의 귀화식물. 사이언스북스.
14 이창복. 2006. 대한식물도감. 향문사.
15 강수학.김형국.구본학. 2007. 청계천 복원 전.후의 식물상 변화 연구. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 10(3):8-13.
16 김송이.김혜주.이규석. 2004. 하천 조성 기법에 따른 서호천 식생 및 식물상의 차이 비교. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 7(3):26-34.
17 박진원.마호섭. 2003. 양재천의 식생현황과 하천 자연도 평가. 농업생명과학연구 37(2):57-70.
18 배정희.이경재.한봉호. 2008. 도시하천의 횡단구조에 따른 식생분포특성 연구. -서울시도림천, 방학천, 성내천, 양재천을 사례로-. 한국환경생태학회지 22(3):268-279.   과학기술학회마을
19 강남구청. 2005. 양재천 생태계 조사연구.
20 신정이. 1999. 자연형 하천 공법 적용 후의 식생변화분석 서울시 양재천의 학여울 구간을 중심으로-. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 2(3):10-17.