1 |
S. Volo, Conceptualizing experience: a tourist based approach, J. Hospitality Marketing Manag. 18 (2009), 111-126.
DOI
|
2 |
R. A. Carlson, Experienced Cognition, Psychology Press, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1997.
|
3 |
M. Kang and U. Gretzel, Perceptions of museum podcast tours: effects of consumer innovativeness, internet familiarity and podcasting affinity on performance expectancies, Tour. Manag. Perspect. 4 (2012), 155-163.
DOI
|
4 |
B. K. Foguem et al., Knowledge formalization in experience feedback processes: an ontology-based approach, Comp. Ind. 59 (2008), 694-710.
DOI
|
5 |
B. Kamsu‐Foguem and F. H. Abanda, Experience modeling with graphs encoded knowledge for construction industry, Comput. Ind. 70 (2015), 79-88.
DOI
|
6 |
K. Efthymiou et al., On knowledge reuse for manufacturing systems design and planning: a semantic technology approach, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 8 (2015), 1-11.
DOI
|
7 |
C. Park et al., Knowledge-based AOP framework for business rule aspects in business process, ETRI J. 29 (2007), 477-488.
DOI
|
8 |
E. R. Reyes et al., Improvement of online adaptation knowledge acquisition and reuse in case-based reasoning: application to process engineering design, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 41 (2015), 1-16.
DOI
|
9 |
D. Mourtzis, M. Doukas, and C. Giannoulis, An inference-based knowledge reuse framework for historical product and production information retrieval, Procedia CIRP 41 (2016), 472-477.
DOI
|
10 |
P. P. Ruiz, B. K. Foguem, and B. Grabot, Generating knowledge in maintenance from experience feedback, Knowl-Based Syst. 68 (2014), 4-20.
DOI
|
11 |
W. L. Mikos et al., A system for distributed sharing and reuse of design and manufacturing knowledge in the PFMEA domain using a description logics-based ontology, J. Manuf. Syst. 30 (2011), 133-143.
DOI
|
12 |
J. Cheng, A strong relevant logic model of epistemic processes in scientific discovery, Information modelling and knowledge bases XI, IOS Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
|
13 |
M. H. Abel, Knowledge map-based web platform to facilitate organizational learning return of experiences, Comput. Human Behaver 51 (2015), 960-966.
DOI
|
14 |
L. Razmerita et al., Ontology-based user modeling for knowledge management systems, in Proc. Int. Conf. User Model., Johnstown, PA, USA, June 22-26, 2003, pp. 213-217.
|
15 |
A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, An eBusiness model ontology for modeling eBusiness, in Proc. BLED Electron. Commerce Conf., Bled, Slovenia, June 17-19, 2002, pp. 1-12.
|
16 |
S. Zhang et al., Ontology-based semantic modeling of construction safety knowledge: towards automated safety planning for job hazard analysis (JHA), Automat. Constr. 52 (2015), 29-41.
DOI
|
17 |
G. S. Stephan, H. S. Pascal, and A. S. Andreas, Knowledge representation and ontologies, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
|
18 |
T. R. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specification, Knowl. Acquis. 5 (1993), 199-220.
DOI
|
19 |
M. A. Musen, Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse, Comp. Biomed. Res. 25 (1992), 435-467.
DOI
|
20 |
N. F. Noy and D. L. McGuinness, Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL‐01‐05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI‐2001‐0880, Mar. 2001.
|
21 |
D. L. McGuinness and J. Wright, Conceptual modeling for configuration: A description logic-based approach, Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 12 (1998), no. 4, 333-344.
DOI
|
22 |
D. L. McGuinness et al., An environment for merging and testing large ontologies, in Proc. Int. Conf. Principle Knowl. Representation Reasoning, Breckenridge, CO, USA, Apr. 11-15, 2000, pp. 483-493.
|
23 |
P. L. Lee, What's wrong with logic models, LCSA: Occasional Paper no. 1, 2011, available: https://www.lcsansw.org.au/documents/item/210
|
24 |
Q. Ni et al., A foundational ontology‐based model for human activity representation in smart homes, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 8 (2016), no. 1, 47-61.
DOI
|
25 |
B. Smith, Logic and formal ontology, in J. N. Mohanty and W. McKenna (eds.), Husserl's phenomenology: a textbook, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, USA, 1989.
|
26 |
J. Shen and Y. Ban, Route choice of the shortest travel time based on floating car data, J. Sens. 2016 (2016), 7041653:1-7041711.
|
27 |
Y. Hu et al, A geo-ontology design pattern for semantic trajectories, in Proc Int. Conf. Spatial Inform. Theory, Scarborough, UK, Sept. 2-6, 2013, pp. 438-456.
|
28 |
M. Effati and A. Sadeghi-Niaraki, A semantic-based classification and regression tree approach for modelling complex spatial rules in motor vehicle crashes domain, WIREs: Mining Knowl Discovery 5 (2015), no. 4, 181-194.
DOI
|
29 |
M. Baglioni et al., An ontology-based approach for the semantic modelling and reasoning on trajectories, in Proc. Int. Conf. Concept. Model., Barcelona, Spain, Oct. 20-23, 2008, pp. 344-353.
|
30 |
U. Durak, H. Oguztuzun, and S. K. Ider, Ontology‐based domain engineering for trajectory simulation reuse, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 19 (2009), no. 8, 1109-1129.
DOI
|
31 |
E. Camossi, P. Villa, and L. Mazzola, Semantic-based anomalous pattern discovery in moving object trajectories, arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.1946, 2013.
|
32 |
R. Wannous et al., Modelling mobile object activities based on trajectory ontology rules considering spatial relationship rules, Modeling approaches and algorithms for advanced computer applications, Springer International Publishing, 2013, pp. 249-258.
|
33 |
T. Malgundkar, M. Rao, and S. S. Mantha, GIS driven urban traffic analysis based on ontology, Int. J. Manag. Inform. Technol. 4 (2012), 15-23.
DOI
|
34 |
S. Saeedi et al., An ontology based context modeling approach for mobile touring and navigation system, in Proc. Canadian Geomatics Conf. Symp. Commission I, ISPRS Convergence in Geomatics-Shaping Canada's Competitive Landscape, Calgary, Canada, June 15-18, 2010, pp. 1-7.
|
35 |
A. Sadeghi-Niaraki et al., Ontology based SDI to facilitate spatially enabled society, in Proc. GSDI 12 World Conf., Singapore, Oct. 19-22, 2010, pp. 1-10.
|
36 |
A. S. Niaraki and K. Kim, Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach, Expert Syst. Applicat. 36 (2009), no. 2, 2250-2259.
DOI
|