Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2017-0327

Ensemble convolutional neural networks for automatic fusion recognition of multi-platform radar emitters  

Zhou, Zhiwen (Department of Operational Command, Command College of the PAP)
Huang, Gaoming (College of Electronic Engineering, Naval University of Engineering)
Wang, Xuebao (College of Electronic Engineering, Naval University of Engineering)
Publication Information
ETRI Journal / v.41, no.6, 2019 , pp. 750-759 More about this Journal
Abstract
Presently, the extraction of hand-crafted features is still the dominant method in radar emitter recognition. To solve the complicated problems of selection and updation of empirical features, we present a novel automatic feature extraction structure based on deep learning. In particular, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is adopted to extract high-level abstract representations from the time-frequency images of emitter signals. Thus, the redundant process of designing discriminative features can be avoided. Furthermore, to address the performance degradation of a single platform, we propose the construction of an ensemble learning-based architecture for multi-platform fusion recognition. Experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithms are feasible and effective, and they outperform other typical feature extraction and fusion recognition methods in terms of accuracy. Moreover, the proposed structure could be extended to other prevalent ensemble learning alternatives.
Keywords
deep learning; emitter recognition; ensemble learning; robustness; time-frequency analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 R.G. Wiley, ELINT: The interception and analysis of radar signals, Artech House Publishers, London, USA, 2006.
2 Q. Guo et al., Recognition of radar emitter signals based on SVD and AF main ridge slice, J. Commun. Netw. 17 (2015), no. 5, 491-498.   DOI
3 D. Zeng et al., Automatic modulation classification of radar signals using the generalized time-frequency fepresentation of Zhao, Atlas and Marks, IET Radar, Sonar Navig. 5 (2010), no. 4, 507-516.   DOI
4 J. Ma et al., Robust radar waveform recognition algorithm based on random projections and sparse classification, IET Radar Sonar Navig. 8 (2014), no. 4, 290-296.   DOI
5 C. Andre, S.L. Hegarat-Mascle, and R. Reynaud, Evidential framework for data fusion in a multi-sensor surveillance system, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 43 (2015), 166-180.   DOI
6 Z.W. Zhou, G.M. Huang, and J. Gao, An emitter fusion recognition algorithm based on multi-collaborative representation, in Proc. Int. Cong. Image Signal Process, Liaoning, China, 2015, pp. 1231-1235.
7 C.X. Chen, M.H. He, and H.F. Li, An improved radar emitter recognition method based on Dezert-Smarandache theory, Chinese J. Electron. 24 (2015), no. 3, 611-615.   DOI
8 Y. Bengio, Learning Deep Architectures for AI: Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, Now Publishers, USA, 2009.
9 J. Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: an overview, Neural Netw. 61 (2015), 85-117.   DOI
10 X.B. Wang et al., Radar emitter recognition based on the short time fourier transform and convolutional neural networks, in Proc. Int. Cong. Image Signal Process., BioMed. Eng. Inform., Shanghai, China, 2017, pp. 1-5.
11 C. Wang, J. Wang, and X.D. Zhang, Automatic radar waveform recognition based on time-frequency analysis and convolutional neural network, in Proc. Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., New Orleans, LA, USA, 2017, pp. 2437-2441.
12 S.H. Kong et al., Automatic LPI radar waveform recognition using CNN, IEEE Access 6 (2018), 4207-4219.   DOI
13 M. Skurichina and R.P.W. Duin, Bagging, boosting and the random subspace method for linear classifiers, Pattern Anal. Appl. 5 (2002), no. 2, 121-135.   DOI
14 Y. Freund, Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority, Inf. Comput. 121 (1995), no. 2, 256-285.   DOI
15 T. Thayaparan et al., Time-frequency approach to radar detection, imaging, and classification, IET Signal Process. 4 (2010), no. 4, 325-328.   DOI
16 R. Moradi and R. Yousefzadeh, Recognizing objectionable images using convolutional neural nets, in Proc. Signal Process. Intell. Sys. Conf., Tehran, Iran, 2015, pp. 133-137.
17 M. Anthimopoulos et al., Lung pattern classification for interstitial lung diseases using a deep convolutional neural network, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35 (2016), no. 5, 1207-1216.   DOI
18 Y. Freund and R.E. Schapire, A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. 55 (1999), 23-37.
19 D.C. Tao et al., Asymmetric bagging and random subspace for support vector machines-based relevance feedback in image retrieval, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28 (2006), no. 7, 1088-1099.   DOI
20 L. Breiman, Bagging predictors, Mach. Learn. 24 (1996), no. 2, 123-140.   DOI
21 J. Lunden and V. Koivunen, Automatic radar waveform recognition, IEEE J. Sel. Top Signal Process. 1 (2007), no. 1, 124-136.   DOI