Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2017-0298

Fast 3D reconstruction method based on UAV photography  

Wang, Jiang-An (School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University)
Ma, Huang-Te (School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University)
Wang, Chun-Mei (School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University)
He, Yong-Jie (School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University)
Publication Information
ETRI Journal / v.40, no.6, 2018 , pp. 788-793 More about this Journal
Abstract
3D reconstruction of urban architecture, land, and roads is an important part of building a "digital city." Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are gradually replacing other platforms, such as satellites and aircraft, in geographical image collection; the reason for this is not only lower cost and higher efficiency, but also higher data accuracy and a larger amount of obtained information. Recent 3D reconstruction algorithms have a high degree of automation, but their computation time is long and the reconstruction models may have many voids. This paper decomposes the object into multiple regional parallel reconstructions using the clustering principle, to reduce the computation time and improve the model quality. It is proposed to detect the planar area under low resolution, and then reduce the number of point clouds in the complex area.
Keywords
3D reconstruction; clustering; feature extraction; PMVS; UAV;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Y. Furukawa et al., Towards Internet-scale multi-view stereo, IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recogn., San Francisco, CA, USA, June 13-18, 2010, pp. 1434-1441.
2 J. Schoning and G. Heidemann, Evaluation of multi-view 3D reconstruction software, Comput. Anal. Images Patterns: Int. Conf., (CAIP), Valletta, Malta, Sept. 2-4, 2015, pp. 450-461.
3 S. Corazza et al., Markerless motion capture through visual hull, articulated ICP and subject specific model generation, Int. J. Comput. Vision 87 (2009), no. 1, 156-158.   DOI
4 M. Goesele et al., Multi-view stereo for community photo collections, IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Oct. 14-21, 2007, pp. 1-8.
5 D. Bradley, T. Boubekeur, and W. Heidrich, Accurate multi-view reconstruction using robust binocular stereo and surface meshing, IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recogn., Anchorage, AK, USA, June 23-28, 2008, pp. 1-8.
6 W. Tao, Y. Lei, and P. Mooney, Dense point cloud extraction from UAV captured images in forest area, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Spatial Data Mining Geographical Knowledge Services, Fuzhou, China, June 29-July 1, 2011, pp. 389-392.
7 W. Burger and M. J. Burge, Scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), digital image processing: An algorithmic introduction using java, Springer, London, UK, 2016, pp. 609-664.
8 S. Agarwal et al., Bundle adjustment in the large, Eur. Conf. Comput. Vision, Heraklion, Greece, Sept. 5-11, 2010, pp. 29-42.
9 S. R. Gunn, Edge detection error in the discrete Laplacian of Gaussian, Proc. Int. Conf. Image Process., Chicago, IL, USA, Oct. 7, 1998, pp. 515-519.
10 W. Cai et al., A 3D difference-of-Gaussian-based lesion detector for brain PET, IEEE Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Beijing, China, Apr. 29-May 2, 2014, pp. 677-680.
11 E. Brier and M. Joye, Weierstrass elliptic curves and side-channel attacks, Int. Workshop Practice Theory Public Key Cryptosystems, Paris, France, Feb. 12-14, 2002, pp. 335-345.
12 E. Tola, C. Strecha, and P. Fua, Efficient large-scale multi-view stereo for ultra-high-resolution image sets, Mach. Vision Applicat. 23 (2012), no 5, 903-920.   DOI
13 M. Hofer, M. Maurer, and H. Bischof, Improving sparse 3D models for man-made environments using line-based 3D reconstruction, Int. Conf. 3D Vision, Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 8-11, 2014, pp. 535-542.
14 M. Mauro et al., An integer linear programming model for view selection on overlapping camera clusters, Int. Conf. 3D Vision, Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 8-11, 2014, pp. 464-471.
15 L. Lou et al., Accurate multi-view stereo 3D reconstruction for cost-effective plant phenotyping, Image Anal. Recog.: Int. Conf., Vilamoura, Portugal, Oct. 22-24, 2014, pp. 349-356.
16 F. Wang and N. An, Accurate multi-view stereopsis fusing DAISY descriptor and scaled-neighbourhood patches, Adv. Multimedia Inform. Process.: Pacific-Rim Conf. Multimedia, Xian, China, Sept. 15-16, 2016, pp. 260-270.
17 C. Strecha et al., On benchmarking camera calibration and multiview stereo for high resolution imagery, IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recogn., Anchorage, AK, USA, June 23-28, 2008, 1-8.
18 N. D. F. Campbell et al., Automatic 3D object segmentation in multiple views using volumetric graph-cuts, Image Vision Comput. 28 (2010), no. 1, pp. 14-25.   DOI
19 D. Marr, Artificial intelligence - A personal view, Artif. Intell. 9 (1977), no. 1, 75-108.
20 W. Heldens et al., Suitability of remote sensing based surface information for a three-dimensional urban microclimate model, IEEE Int. Geosci. Remote Sensing Symp. (IGARSS), Beijing, China, July 10-15, 2016, pp. 7322-7325.
21 O. Faugeras and R. Keriven, Variational principles, surface evolution, PDEs, level set methods, and the stereo problem, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7 (1998), no. 3, 336-344.   DOI
22 C. Tomasi and T. Kanade, Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method, Int. J. Comput. Vision 9 (1992), no. 2, 137-154.   DOI
23 P. E. Debevec, C. J. Taylor, and J. Malik, Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: A hybrid geometry- and image-based approach, Proc. Annu. Conf. Comput. Graphics interactive techn., New Orleans, LA, USA, Aug. 4-9, 1996, 11-20.
24 R. Koch et al., A geometric approach to light field calibration, Comput. Anal. Images Patterns: Int. Conf., CAIP'99, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Sept. 1-3, 1999, pp. 596-603.
25 S. Agarwal et al., Building Rome in a day, IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vision, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 29-Oct. 2, 2009, pp. 72-79.
26 Y. Furukawa and J. Ponce, Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis, IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Recogn., Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 17-22, 2007, pp. 1-8.