Browse > Article

A Study on Nutrition Composition Labeling and Nutrition Claim Practices for the Processed Foods  

오세인 (서일대학 식품영양과)
장영애 (한국보건산업진흥원)
Publication Information
Korean journal of food and cookery science / v.20, no.1, 2004 , pp. 100-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of current nutrition labeling on the packaging of the processed foods that provide consumers with a reliable and consistent source of information, which has been considered as a useful aid for food selection and a potent educational tool for nutrition in daily life. The 2,160 processed foods purchased at the supermarket on September, 2002, were divided by food category issued from the 2002 food codes and assessed in the terms of the nutrition composition labeling and nutrition claims. Nutrition composition labeling was found on 356 of the 2160 processed foods items. Milk and dairy products had 49.7％ of nutrition composition labeling, which was the largest number among the food category. Tables were most frequently used as the type of nutrition composition labeling (79.8％). Nutrition composition including many different ways of expression, such as a table of nutrition composition, indication of nutrition composition, analysis table of nutrition composition and comparative table of nutrition composition, made frequent use of nutrition composition labeling titles (78.7％). The various unit of measures were use in the nutrition labeling of the processed foods, per l00g or 100$m\ell$ was the highest (44.6％) under the currently practiced nutrition labeling. The correct labeling standard with nutrient content and ％ RDA except energy, was used on 47.8％ of labels, and those with only liability indication nutrient and liability indication nutrients plus discretion indication nutrients were 25.3 and 22.5％ respectively. The processed foods with nutrition claims were 8.0％ (172 items). Nutrition claims were divided in two ways: nutrient content claims and nutrient comparative claims. The most frequently used claims were contained in the former (44.4％) and more or plus in the latter case (16.3％). Ca was the most popular item as a nutrition claim nutrient (50.6％).
Keywords
nutrition composition labeling; nutrition claim; nutrient content claim; nutrient comparative claim;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Heimbach, JT and Stokes, RC : Nutrition labeling and public health: survey of American institute of nutrition members, food industry, and consumers. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 36: 700-708, 1982
2 Gourlie, KE : Food labeling: A Canadian and international perspective. Nutr. Rev., 53(4): 103-105, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Chang, SO: A Study on the current Nutrition Labeling Practices for the Processed Foods Retailed in the Supermarket in Korea. The Korea Journal of Nutrition, 30(1): 100-108, 1997
4 Park, HR and Min, YH: A basic research for the adoption and implementation of nutrition labeling: with a reference to the consumer awareness. Korean J. Dietary culture, 10(3): 155-166, 1995
5 녹색소비자연대 : 영양표시제도의 활성화. 행정개혁과제, 2000
6 Lee, KH and Yeo, JS : Analysis of Consumer Behavior on Using Food Label. Kor. Home Economics, 34(5): 235 -248, 1996
7 Schucker, RE, Levy, A, Tenny, TE and Mathews, O: Nutrition shelf-labeling and consumer purchase behavior. J. Nutr. Educ., 24: 75-81, 1992   DOI
8 노영화: 식품표시에 대한 소비자인식에 관한 연구. 소비자문제연구, 제23호, 2000
9 노영화 : 식품영양표시제도에 관한 연구., 한국소비자보호원, 1998
10 Michel, PM, Korslund, MK, Finan, A and Johnson, J : Food label reading habits of WIC clients. J. Nutr. Educ., 26(3): 146-148, 1994   DOI
11 Kim, DS and Lee, JW: Use and recognition of nutrition labelings in processed foods among middle students and their parents. J. of Korean Dietetic Association, 8(3): 30 1-310, 2002
12 Brecher, SJ, Bender, MM, Wilkening, VL, McCabe, NM and Anderson, EM: Status of nutrition labeling, heath claims, and nutrient content claims for the processed food: 1997 food label and package survey. J. Am. diet. Assoc., 100(9): 1057-1062, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chang, SO: A Study on the Perception, Use, and Demand of Housewife -Consumers for Nutrition Label. The Korea Journal of Nutrition, 33(7): 763-773, 2000
14 Shin, AJ, Kye, SH, Jang, YA, Kim, BH and Lee, HS: Healthy Korea 2010: Objectives and Strategies-Nutrition-. Korea Health Industry Development Institute research paper, 2000
15 서민원: 영양교육제도 도입을 위한 입법 추진방안. 전국영양사학술대회 자료집, 79-115, 2000
16 보건복지부: 식품 등의 표시기준. 식품의약품안전청 고시 제 99-15호, 1999
17 Chung, HR, Jang, YA, Cho, YH and Lee, HJ: Study for Better Nutrition Labeling System in Korea. Korea Health Industry Development Institute research paper, 2001
18 Chung, HR: Development of Community Nutrition Program and its application though consumer organization. Korea Health Industry Development Institute research paper, 2000
19 대한주부클럽연합회: 소비자 건강증진과 영양성분 표시 확대를 위한 간담회 자료집, 2001
20 Chung, HR : Development of Community Nutrition Program and its application though consumer organization. Korea Health Industry Development Institute research paper, 2000
21 Pennington JAT and Vanderveen, JE: Descriptive terms for foods with special dietary characteristics. J. Nutr. Edu., 20(1): 30-32, 1988   DOI
22 Crane, NT, Behlen, PM, Yetley EA and Vanderveen, JE : Nutrition labeling of foods: A global perspective. Nutr. today, 25: 28-35, 1990   DOI
23 Silverglade, B: The nutrition labeling and education act: A public health milestone is now under attack. J. Nutr. Educ., 28(6): 251-253, 1996
24 Im, HS. and Kim, HS.: Utilization of the current food labeling system of processed of foods and awareness on nutrition labeling among middle school female teachers. J. korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr., 27(4): 763-774, 1998
25 식품의약품안전청: 식품 등의 표시기준. 식품의약품안전청 고시 제2000-36호, 2000
26 Pennington JAT, Wilkening, VL and Vanderveen, JE: Descriptive terms for food labeling. J. Nutr. Edu., 22(1): 51-54, 1990   DOI
27 보건복지부 : 국민건강증진종합계획(Health Plan 2010). 2002
28 Park, HR and Min, YH: A basic research for the adoption and implementation of nutrition labeling: With a reference to the consumer awareness. Korean J. dietary cuIture, 10(3): 155-166, 1995
29 Chang, SO: A study of the Comprehension and Preference of Consumers to Four Different Formats of Nutrition Label. The Korea Journal of Nutrition, 30(6):679-689, 1997