Browse > Article

A Study on Inhabitants Consciousness of Urban Residential Area Scenic Sites - Focused on Historical and Cultural Environment Conservation Area of Seongragwon(Scenic Sites no.35) Area -  

Yeon, Ung (National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage)
Lee, Won-Ho (National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage)
Lee, Se-Mi (National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture / v.31, no.1, 2013 , pp. 38-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was performed in order to preserve and protect the scenic sites and surrounding environment is located in the Urban Residential Area. After classifying the type of area surrounding parcels of Seongbuk-dong is located in Seongragwon, Satisfaction Survey, scenic sites designated areas for residents living near the analyzed. Research methods, Cadastral research, literature survey, field survey, and the survey was conducted. Cultural heritage awareness about the collected questionnaires of frequency analysis, and reliability analysis for cultural heritages around satisfaction, satisfaction analysis by parcel area, parcel area for the verification of specific differences regression analysis for the full-on relationship satisfaction, one-way ANOVA was conducted for each. Overall Cultural awareness analysis results, the residence is located close to the Seoul Seonjamdanji, Seongragwon, Simujang, Sanghoe Lee Tae-Joon's houses, Seoul Hanyang castle showed that cultural heritage were know unfulfilled cultural heritage. The purpose of cultural heritage visit was to break/walks. Preservation was usually level and there is no inconvenience caused as a cultural heritage. Regulatory intensity level was usually level and showed a positive reaction to the impact of cultural heritage in Seongbuk-dong image mostly. cultural heritage have a positive impact on the image of the town. but access to cultural heritage is not easy and doesn't affect the life is expected. Overall satisfaction for cultural heritages in the surrounding space, the larger the size of the lot, and higher satisfaction. Seongbuk-dong most of the residents satisfaction was higher. Small lots of residents showed low satisfaction for safety when walking at night, heritage value rise, private ownership of heritage use, harmony with surrounding environment, Building exterior, non-physical uniqueness like culture art mental. It can be interpreted that small lots of residential environment quality is low compared to the large lots, influx of residents in other regions due to the redevelopment of one of Seongbuk-dong, private ownership of heritage use. And generally lower satisfaction on the harmonization of the facility(street lights, signs, etc.). Therefore cultural heritage signs for facility expansion, cultural educational programs, will be needed to maintain the uniqueness village when scenic sites in the city center around the area of management strategy.
Keywords
Satisfaction; Scenic Sites; Seongragwon; Sungbookdong; Awareness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 강동진(2003). 문화재보호법과 관련된 양동마을 주민의식 변화 : 1994년과 2002년의 비교 연구. 한국조경학회지. 31(3): 46-57.
2 김감래, 강대룡(2010). 필지기반의 토지이용현황 분류체계 연구. 한국지적정보학회지. 12(1): 187-204.
3 김상묵, 안재호, 정현(1999). 경주시 문화재 및 주민피해 실태에 관한연구. 경주연구. 8: 47-69.
4 김영규(2009). 한국과 일본의 문화재 보호정책 비교연구: 문화재 보호법 및 관리방식을 중심으로. 한국지역혁신논집. 4(2): 79-107.
5 서혜림(2012). 함양 용유담 명승지정 철회 요구집회 열려. 연합뉴스. 2012.04.16.
6 손진상(2010). 역사문화도시의 보존법제에 관한 연구. 공법학연구. 11(1): 295-323.
7 윤완준(2007). 문화재로 일석이조 문화마케팅. 동아일보. 2007.06.07.
8 이영미(2007). 문화재지정 전통가옥 주거공간의 변형실태와 보존 및 활용에 대한 인식도 조사. 조형미술논문집. 7(2): 115-133.
9 장호수(2002). 문화재학개론. 서울: 백산자료원. pp.338.
10 정종섭(2003). 국가의 문화유산보존의무와 고도의 보존. 서울대학교 법학. 44(3): 9-42.
11 조상희(2011). 경주시 양동마을, 세계문화유산 선정에 따른 거주민 의식에 관한 사례 연구. 호텔환광연구. 40: 1-10.
12 조한필(2003). 온양행궁 터 문화재 지정 추진. 중앙일보. 2003.10.14
13 지적도. 서울특별시 성북구청.
14 홍완식(2009). 문화 보호법제의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 토지공법연구. 44: 235-258.
15 http://www.cha.go.kr