Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2011.29.4.040

A Study on the Historical Landscape Cognition of Mt. Hee-yang  

Ahn, Gye-Bog (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Catholic University of Deagu)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture / v.29, no.4, 2011 , pp. 40-48 More about this Journal
Abstract
Mt. Hee-yang is located in Mungyeong-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea. Through the analysis and interpretations of twenty-two different ancient writings which covers Mt. Hee-yang, and three times of field studies, I tried to analyze the cognition of our ancestors in those days regarding Mt. Hee-yang. Since Mt. Hee-yang goes very deep in the mountain range, Mt. Hee-yang was recognized as appropriate place for seclusion or operating Byeolseo. From the era of Silla, in terms of Fengshui, Mt. Hee-yang was also interpreted as an image of either a phoenix flying into the sky(鳳凰登天) or a valley of a phoenix and dragon(鳳巖龍谷). This cognition comes from its formations of topographical features, and continued to the era of Joseon Dynasty. The purposes of excursion were to retrace the course of predecessors, to attain one's long-cherished desire to visit, or to enjoy holidays. From the analysis of Mt. Hee-yang's visitors, the average social status of them is lowered a lot around the end of Joseon Dynasty, compared with the early period of Joseon Dynasty. Studying the visitor's route of Mt. Hee-yang, I could see the places that are highly-recognized were the top of Mt. Hee-yang, Seonyudong(仙遊洞), Bakundae(白雲臺), Yayuam(夜遊岩). Mt. Hee-yang was recognized as Sun-kyung(仙境) where Sin-seon(a taoist hermit with miraculous powers; the sage of old) lives, and mostly it was main destination of visit while Bakundae(白雲臺) was perceived diversely on each visitor because of its strange scenery.
Keywords
Fengshui; Byeol-seo; Landscape Sightseeing; Taoist Hermit;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 권벌(1752). 冲齋集.
2 권수제(1907). 연재문집.
3 최원석(1996. 9. 3). 사찰과 풍수지리 3: 문경 희양산 봉암사. 주간불교 456.
4 최치원(이상형 역 2009). 고운집, 헤럴드미디어.
5 최현(1778). 인재집(訒齋集).
6 홍귀달(1611). 허백정집.
7 홍대구(1694). 東庵遺稿.
8 홍병화, 김성우(2007). 희양산봉암사 극락전의 연구. 건축역사연구. 16(5): 7-20.
9 http://www.itkc.or.kr/
10 http://db.itkc.or.kr/itkcdb/mainIndexIframe.jsp
11 http://kyu.snu.ac.kr/
12 http://people.aks.ac.kr/index.aks
13 http://river.kwater.or.kr/garam/
14 김창협(1709). 農巖集.
15 권오정 등(2010). 희양산 소나무 군집구조 특성. 한국환경생태학회 학술대회 논문집. 20(1): 31-34.
16 김문기(2004). 문경의 구곡원림. 파주. 문경시.
17 김장호(2009). 한국 百名山記. 평화출판사.
18 김창흡(1732). 三淵集.
19 문경시(2010). 산림유전자자원보호림 실태조사 및 연차별 사업계획 수립용역.
20 문경시(2011). 희양산 봉암사. 주(경일).
21 민우수(1799). 貞菴集.
22 민족문화추진회(1985). 신증동국여지승람 IV. 서울: 민족문화문고간행회.
23 민족문화추진회(2004). 농암집 4. 헤럴드미디어.
24 서거정(1970). 속 東文選. 경희출판사.
25 성해응(1797-1826). 硏經齋全集.
26 송병선(1907). 淵齋集.
27 송준길(1687). 同春堂集.
28 오원(1752). 月谷集.
29 이덕무(1900년대). 靑莊館全書.
30 이유장(1775). 孤山集.
31 이익성 역(2006). 택리지. 서울: 을유문화사.
32 이혜순 등(1997). 조선 중기의 유산기 문학. 서울: 집문당.
33 정경세(1657). 愚伏集.
34 송기채 역(1994). 정약용. 다산시문집 제 13권. 민족문화추진회.
35 정종로(1835). 立齋集.
36 정희량(1897). 허암유집.
37 주세붕(1895). 武陵雜稿.
38 청은 지수(1783) 희양산봉암사사적(필사본).
39 최성대(1700연대). 杜機詩集.