Browse > Article

Research on Odd-Shaped Stones at Baekje's Palace Backyard in Wanggung-ri, Iksan  

Rho, Jae-Hyun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, Woosuk University)
Shin, Sang-Sup (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, Woosuk University)
Park, Yool-Jin (Dept. of Environmental Gardening, Chonbuk National University)
Kim, Hwa-Ok (Dept. of Environmental Gardening, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture / v.28, no.4, 2010 , pp. 1-13 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research was conducted to understand the characteristics and traits of Baekje's palace backyard by studying and analyzing the usage, shape, size, material, and place of origin of the odd-shaped stones found at the remains of Baekje's palace in Waggung-ri, Iksan. The results of the research are as following. The odd-shaped stones found at the Baekje palace backyard were used for two purposes. Some of the stones were used as heaping stones(疊石) for the stone waterfall in the backyard while others were used as ornamental stones(置石) to exhibit the uniqueness and beauty of the stone themselves. The stones used for the waterfall had various shapes and materials and were arranged to symbolize the beauty of natural scenery. On the other hand, the ornamental stones were used to exhibit their beauty of forms. Among the twenty six ornamental stones, four were large, four were mid-sized, and eighteen were small. The twenty four heaping stones used for the waterfall were all categorized as small. All of the stones were not too big, easily coming into sight of human beings. The heaping stones were mostly limestones, and some of them were metamorphic rocks such as marble, quartz, green rock, slaty rock, and phyllite. Almost all of the odd-shaped stones used for Baekje's palace backyard have beautiful patterns and specific forms that resemble natural scenes or animals such as a turtle, terrapin, pig, bear, or elephant. Some of the ornamental stones apparently went through carving to emphasize the unique shapes. Considering the usage and characteristic of the odd-shaped stones, one of the most characteristic feature of the Wanggung-ri palace backyard can be said to be 'the garden of odd-shaped stones'. Meanwhile, according to references, interviews, questionings, and on-the-spot surveys on the people who quarried the stones, the stones found at the remains of the Wanggung-ri palace came mostly from Mt. Cheonho in Hosan-ri, Yeosan-myeon, Iksna, and Mt. Shidae in Dosoon-ri, Wanggung-myeon.
Keywords
Odd-shaped Stones; The Remains of Wangghng-ri; Baekje's Palace Backyard; Garden of Odd-shaped Stones;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 (주)두산동아(2007). 동아대국어사전. 서울: (주)두산동아. 제5판. p.261.
2 이성혜(1996). 괴석의 문학적 형상화 고찰. 문화전통논집. 제4집: 197- 220.
3 이희승 편저(1994). 국어대사전. 제3판. 서울: 민중서림. p.367.
4 신상섭(1996). 동양조경사. 주택정원. 서울: 문운당: p.207.
5 전영옥(2004). 조선시대 괴석의 특성과 산수화와의 관련성에 관한 연구. 한국전통조경학회지. 22(2): 1-12.
6 전유태(1983). 안압지와 임해전 복원. 문화재. 16: 1-16.
7 정재훈(1998). 창덕궁 후원에 대하여. 미술사학연구. 136.137: 202-210.
8 한국전통조경학회(2009). 동양조경문화사. 서울: 대가.
9 강신술(1990). 조선시대 괴석도 연구. 홍익대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
10 국립부여문화재연구소(2007). 왕궁리 유적 뉴스레터. 2007년 제1호.
11 국립부여문화재연구소(2008). 왕궁리 발굴중간보고 VI. 학술연구총서. 제47집: 9.
12 국립부여문화재연구소(2009). 익산 왕궁리 유적. 제21차 발굴조사 자문위원회자료.
13 김미영(1999). 괴석도에 나타난 표현기법에 관한 연구; 조선시대 회화작품을 중심으로. 조선대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
14 김지호(2006). 괴석도 연구. 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
15 김창고(1990). 익산 왕궁평의 괴석. 익산문화. 익산고적선양회. 창간호: 194-214.
16 문화공보부, 문화재관리국(1978). 안압지 발굴조사보고서(도판편), 고려서적주식회사.
17 민경현(1985). 전통 수석정원에 관한 연구; 삼국시대를 중심으로. 한국정원학회지. 1(4): 307-337.
18 민경현(1998). 主.從.添과 不等邊三角의 美. 서울: 도서출판 예경. pp.98- 126.
19 경자(2002). 고대 한.중.일원지의 비교연구; 최근 발굴된 원지를 중심으로. 한국조경학회지. 30(4): 1-8.   과학기술학회마을
20 강성애(1998). 조선시대궁원의 괴석에 대하여. 전남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
21 http://www.munhwajl.com/zboard/view.php?id=data_histoy&no=11
22 한글학회(2008). 우리말사전. 서울: (주)어문학. p.230.
23 田中哲雄(2002). 發掘された庭園. 日本の美術. 429號. 東京: 至文堂.
24 西桂(2005). 日本の庭園文化. 京都 學藝出版社. pp.12-41.
25 http://100.naver.com/100.nhn?docid=64626
26 http://imagesearch.naver.com/search.naver?where=idetail&rev=5& query=%BE%C8%BE%D0%C1%F6%20&from=image&ac=-1&sort
27 http://wg.iksan.go.kr/relice
28 http://www.suiseki.com/classifications/index.html
29 오승연(2004). 한국 고대 궁원지의 전개양상과 사상적 배경에 관한 연구. 문화재. 37호: 65-87.
30 이송(1984). 한국고대정원과 일본고대정원과의 비교연구; 안압지와 동원지를 통하여. 한국정원학회지. 1(3): 263-286.