Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2018.26.4.155

Comparison of Noise Reduction Policy in Medium-sized Airports  

Kim, Young-Rok (한서대학교 항공운항관리학과)
Lim, Jae-Hwan (경희대학교 경제학과)
Choi, Youn-Chul (한서대학교 항공정보산업대학원)
Song, Ki-han (한국교통연구원 공항.소음분석센터)
Shin, Hong-Woo (한국교통연구원 공항.소음분석센터)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics / v.26, no.4, 2018 , pp. 155-163 More about this Journal
Abstract
The development in air transport increases noise around the airport. In order to reduce the noise around the airport, International Civil Aviation Organization has made a lot of effort since the 1970s and Many countries, including South Korea, are implementing many noise reduction policies. This paper investigates those noise reduction policies of medium-sized airports with similar frequency to Gimpo, Jeju and Gimhae airports in South Korea and compares eleven airports in Europe, eleven airports in Asia and five airports in America, including Oceania. According to the research, European countries developed and applied the navigation procedure to avoid the noise area according to the characteristics of the airport. In Asia, there are not as many domestic noise reduction policies. In case of the United States, it provides information only on noise-sensitive areas around airports. After having investigated various policies, this research has examined the noise reduction policy of South Korea. It is concluded that new navigation procedures which reduce noise should be developed.
Keywords
Noise Reduction Policy; Gimpo International Airport; Jeju International Airport; Gimhae International Airport; number of flights; Europe; Asia; the Americas;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 UNITED KINGDOM AIP AD 2 EGSS
2 India AIP AD 2 VOBG
3 LUFTFAHRTHANDBUCH DEUTSCHLAND AIP GERMANY AD 2 EDDT
4 AIP Japan FUKUOKA Civil Aviation Bureau, Japan RJFF AD 2
5 AIP UNITED ARAB EMIRATES AD 2 OMAA
6 AIP BRASIL AD 0.6
7 The Korea Transport Institute. A Study on the Establishment of Noise Abatement Procedures. 2006. pp, 188-205.
8 Woo, J. h. A Study on the Effectiveness of the Measurement Points and Correlation of Aircraft Noise Assessment Units. 2014.
9 Park, H. K. A Study on Automatic Measurement Netting for Airplane Noise Monitoring. 2007.
10 Kim, Y. R. Choi, Y. C. A Study on the Maximum Noise Level of Domestic Airport, The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics 2016 Fall Conference :50-53. 2016.
11 the Korea Transport Institute. Study on Resetting Noise Standard of NADP at Gimpo International Airport : 2016. 137-180.
12 Lee, J. H. A Study on Evaluation of Aircraft Noise around Airport using Flight Path Data. 2010.
13 Kim, Y. R. Choi, Y. C. Choi, J. Y. Study on Noise Characteristics of Airport, International Journal of Energy, Information and Communications, 9(3): 2018. 7-12.
14 LPPT AD 2 AIP PORTUGAL
15 LUFTFAHRTHANDBUCH DEUTSCHLAND AIP GERMANY AD 2 EDDH
16 Republic of Korea RKPK AD 2
17 AIP FRANCE AD-2 LFMN
18 AIP Italia AD 2 LIMC 1
19 AIP SUOMI / FINLAND EFHK AD 2.1 - 27
20 AIP Japan NAHA ROAH AD 2
21 AIP Japan OSAKA INTL RJOO AD 2
22 AIP New Zealand NZAA AD 2
23 AIP Japan NAGOYA RJNA AD 2
24 AIP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
25 UNITED KINGDOM AIP AD 2.EGPF
26 AIP FRANCE AD-2.LFLL
27 AIP TURKEYAD 2 LTAC-14
28 AIP OMAN AD 2 OOMS
29 AIP BAHRAIN FIR AD 2 OBBI
30 Woo, J. H. Kim, H. S. Son, J. W. Park, S. K. 2018. A study on the new proposal of the compensation criteria for noise pollution areas in the vicinity of the airports, The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering 2018 Spring Conference : 113-113
31 http://www.airportnoise.kr/noise
32 AIP Republic of Korea RKPC AD 2
33 Republic of Korea RKSS AD 2