Browse > Article

Factors predicting pilots' performance in routine and non-routine situations  

Lee, Kyung-Soo (연세대학교 심리학과)
Sohn, Young-Woo (연세대학교 심리학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics / v.18, no.4, 2010 , pp. 92-99 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aimed to provide empirical evidence about expert performance approach in aviation field and the results suggested that the amount of experience(e.g. total flight hour) is necessary but not sufficient index of a pilot's expertise or superior performance. 43 pilots participated and completed a spatial span task and SA (situation awareness) tasks. To explore the factors predicting the performance in routine and non-routine situations, discriminant analysis was conducted. The results of discriminant analysis indicated that different variables are related with the performance in routine and non-routine situation. The factors predicting performance in routine situation were the spatial span scores and total flight hours. On the other hand, the factors predicting performance in non-routine situation were age and the qualification for instrument flying. In real world, total flight time which represents the quantity of experience has been frequently used to predict flight abilities and as an important index of expertise. The results of this study suggest that these kinds of factors have to be used cautiously to predict the performance in abnormal situation.
Keywords
expert performance approach; situation awareness; routine situation; non-routine situation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill reexamined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 491–508). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2 Durso, F. T., & Gronlund, S. D. (1999). Situation awareness. In F. T. Durso, R. Nickerson, R. Schvaneveldt, S. Dumais, S. Lindsay, & M. T. H. Chi (Eds.), The handbook of applied cognition (pp. 283-314). New York: Wiley.
3 김민영, 손영우, 박수애 (2005). 의사결정의 판단 기준과 정보 선택에 있어서 경험과 맥락의 영향: 조종사를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업및 조직, 18, 225-246.
4 손영우, 박수애 (2003). 전문성과 작업기억 부하량이 조종사의 상황인식에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16, 155-174.
5 손영우, 이경수 (2009). 조종사 상황인식의 적응적 전문성: 전문가와 초보자의 계기비행 수행 비교. 감성과학, 12, 55-64.   과학기술학회마을
6 Adams, J. W., & Hitch, G. J. (1997). Working memory and children's mental addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67, 21–38.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Taylor, J. L., Kennedy, Q., Noda, A., & Yesavage, A. (2007). Pilot age and expertise predict flight simulator performance: a 3-year longitudinal study. Neurology, 68, 648-654.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4-27.   DOI
9 Sohn, Y. W., & Doane, S. M. (2003). Roles of working memory capacity and long-term working memory skill in complex task performance. Memory & Cognition, 31, 458-466.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Sohn, Y. W., & Doane, S. M. (2004). Memory Processes of Flight Situation Awareness: Interactive Roles of Working Memory Capacity, Long-Term Working Memory, and Expertise. Human Factors, 46, 461–475.   DOI
11 Morrow D. G., Menard, W. E., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Teller, T. & Bryant, D. (2001). The influence of expertise and task factors on age differences in pilot communication. Psychology and aging, 16, 31-46.   DOI
12 Ericsson, K. A. & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102, 211–245.   DOI
13 Ericsson, K. A., Whyte, J., & Ward, P. (2007). Expert performance in nursing: Reviewing research on expertise in nursing within the framework of the expert- performance approach. Advances in Nursing Science, 30, E58-E71.   DOI
14 Kiewra, K. A., & Benton, S. L. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33–44.   DOI
15 Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1985). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models (DTIC #AD-A159080). Atlanta, GA: Center for Man-Machine Systems Research, Georgia Institute of Technology.
16 Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 972-992.   DOI
17 Henderson-Everhardus MC. (2004). Does Nursing Expertise Contribute to the Accuracy of Vascular Assessment in the Detection of Peripheral Arterial Disease? [dissertation]. Denton: Texas Women's College.
18 Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Endsley, M. R. (2006). Expertise and situation awareness. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, (pp.633-651). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
20 Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, (pp.683-705). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
21 Arbuckle, T. Y., Cooney, R., Milne, J., & Melchoir, A. (1994). Memory for spatial layouts in relation to age and schema typicality. Psychology and Aging, 9, 467-480.   DOI
22 Carretta, T. R., Perry, D. C., & Ree, M. J. (1996). Prediction of situational awareness in F-15 pilots. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 21-41.   DOI
23 Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433.   DOI   ScienceOn