Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12673/jant.2014.18.6.562

Case Study on Safety Assessment Standard for A-SMGCS  

Ku, SungKwan (Department of Aviation Leisure & Industry Management, School of Aeronautical Science, Hanseo University)
Baik, Hojong (School of Air Transport, Transportation, Logistics and Air & space Law, Korea Aerospace University)
Abstract
This study is safety assessment standard for advanced surface movement guidance control system (A-SMGCS) and case study of the past research project. A-SMGCS providing routing, guidance and surveillance for the control of aircraft and vehicles in order to maintain the declared surface movement rate under all weather conditions within the aerodrome visibility operational level while maintaining the required level of safety. Recently, in korea and europe are developing A-SMGCS system for the safety control of the airport movement area. In safety oriented industry such as aviation that it is necessary to verify and ensure for operating system. In this case study, analysis of safety assessment standard for verified A-SMGCS target level of safety (TLS) and previous developed A-SMGCS research project.
Keywords
Safety assessment; Target level of safety; Safety standard; Advanced surface movement guidance control system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 S. K. Ku, H. J. Baik and J. H. Park, "Study on A-SMGCS target level of safety and aircraft accident case in europe," in The Korea Society for Aviation and Aeronautics Spring Conference 2014, Korea Aerospace University; Korea, pp. 162-165, May 2014.
2 RTCA DO-287A, Software integrity assurance considerations for communication, navigation, surveillance and air traffic management (CNS/ATM) systems, Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2011.
3 J. J. Kwan and J. E. Hong, "Hazard perspective to solve hazard of safety critical system," in Proceeding of the Korea Computer Congress 2012, Jeju: Korea, Vol. 39 pp. 135-137, Jun. 2012.
4 MIL-STD-882E, System safety, Department of Defense, 2012.
5 N. J. Bahr, System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment, Philadelphia, PA: Taylor&Francis, 1997.
6 SAE ARP4761, Guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment, SAE International, 1996.
7 SAE ARP5150, Safety assessment of transport airplane in commercial service, SAE International, 2003.
8 SAE ARP5151, Safety assessment of general aviation airplanes and rotorcraft in commercial service, SAE International, 2013.
9 Eurocae ED-78A, Guidelines for approval of the provision and use of ATS supported by data communications, Eurocae, 2000.
10 S. B. Hong, S. H. Choi, Y. J. Cho and Y. C. Choi, "A verification & validation methodology study on the development of A-SMGCS," Journal of the Korea Society for Aeronautical Science and Flight Operation, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.81-86, 2014.
11 S. K. Ku and H. J. Baik, "Standard for A-SMGCS Safety Assessment," in The Korea Society for Aviation and Aeronautics Fall Conference 2014, Incheon Airport Aviation Academy: Korea, pp. 86-89, Nov. 2014.
12 H. A. P. Blom, G. J. Bakker, P. J. G. Blanker, J. Daams, H. H. C. Everdij and M. B. Klompstra, Accident risk assessment for advanced air traffic management, National Aerospace Laboratory, 2001.
13 ICAO Doc 9830, Advanced surface movement guidance and control system manual, International Civil Aviation Organization, 2004.