Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2014.52.4.503

Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plants with Life Cycle Assessment  

Pyo, SeHee (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Center for Environmental Studies, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
Kim, MinJeong (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Center for Environmental Studies, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, SeungChul (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Center for Environmental Studies, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
Yoo, ChangKyoo (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Center for Environmental Studies, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Korean Chemical Engineering Research / v.52, no.4, 2014 , pp. 503-515 More about this Journal
Abstract
A lot of existing wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are rebuilt or retrofitted for advanced wastewater treatment processes to cope with reinforced effluent criteria of nitrogen and phosphorous. Moreover, how to treat the wasted sludge from WWTPs has been also issued since the discharge of the wasted sludge into ocean is impossible from 2011 due to the London Convention 97 protocol. These trend changes of WWTPs get a motivation to assess environmental and economic impacts from the construction stage to the waste stage in WWTPs. Therefore, this study focuses on evaluation of environmental and economic impacts of the advanced wastewater treatment processes and waste sludge treatment process by using life cycle assessment. Four advanced wastewater treatment processes of Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic ($A_2O$), 5 stages-Bamard Denitrification Phosphate (Bardenpho), Virginia Initiative Plant (VIP), and Modified University of Cape Town (MUCT) are chosen to compare the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and three waste sludge treatment methods of land fill, incineration, and composting are used. To evaluate environmental and economic impacts of each advanced wastewater treatment processes, life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) are conducted based on International organization for standardization (ISO) guidelines. The results clearly represent that the $A_2O$ process with composting shows 52% reduction in the environmental impact than the CAS process with landfill. On the other hand, the MUCT process with composting is able to save 62% of the life cycle cost comparing with the CAS process with landfill. This result suggested the qualitative and quantitative criteria for evaluating eco-environmental and economic technologies of advanced treatment processes and also sludge treatment method, where their main influence factors on environmental and economic impacts are analyzed, respectively. The proposed method could be useful for selecting the most efficient and eco-friendly wastewater treatment process and sludge treatment method when retrofitting the existing WWTPs to advanced treatments.
Keywords
Advanced Wastewater Treatment; Sludge Treatment; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Life Cycle Cost (LCC); Environmental Impact;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hong, J., Hong, J., Otaki, M. and Jolliet, O., "Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Assessment for Sewage Sludge Treatment Processes in Japan," Waste Manage., 29, 696-703(2009).   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Pasqualino, J. C., Meneses, M., Abella, M. and Castells, F., "LCA as a Decision Support Tool for the Environmental Improvement of the Operation of a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant," Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3300-3307(2009).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 IPCC, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories(2006).
4 Choi, T. H., "Waste Water Treatment Technology Using Adjuvants Coagulation," Ph. M. thesis, Seoul National Univ. of Science and Technology, Korea(2011).
5 Thomsen, M. and Lyck, E., Emission of $CH_4$ and $N_2O$ from Wastewater Treatment Plants (6B), NERI Technical Note No.208, Ministry of the Environment, Denmark(2005).
6 Kloepffer, W., "Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Products," Int J LCA, 13(2), 89-95(2008).   DOI
7 Zhou, Z., Wu, Z., Wang, Z., Tang, S., Gu, G., Wang, L., Wang, Y. and Xin, Z., "Simulation and Performance Evaluation of the Anoxic/anaerobic/aerobic Process for Biological Nutrient Removal," Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(5), 1233-1240(2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kim, M. H. and Yoo, C. K., "Design and Environmental/Economic Performance Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Modeling Methodology," Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 46(3), 610-618(2008).   과학기술학회마을
9 Jung, Y. L., "Application of LCA for the Operation Phase Between Standard Activated Sludge and $A_2O$ process," Ph. M. thesis, the Univ. of Seoul, Korea(2007).
10 Oh, T. S., Kim, M. J., Lim, J. J., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, C. K., "Estimate and Environmental Assessment of Greenhouse Gas(GHG) Emissions and Sludge Emissions in Wastewater Treatment Processes for Climate Change," Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 49(2), 187-194(2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Han, J. Y., Cho, H. C. and Kim, D. K., "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Study of Wastewater Sludge Treatment Systems: Incineration, Composting, Solidification," J. Korean Inst. Resource Recycling, 11(4), 17-26(2002).   과학기술학회마을
12 International Standards Organization, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment- Principle and Frameworks, ISO 14040(2006).
13 Small and Medium Business Administration, Green Management, http://www.greenbiz.go.kr/Ind01020000.action(2010).
14 Lee, J. I., Lee, K. Y. and Yoo, Y. S., Inhibition of waste oversea dump and project, Gyeonggi Research Institute(2013).
15 Lee, H. K., "The study of Change of Operating Factors with Traditional Activated Sludge and Attached Microorganism Process for the Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal," Ph. M. thesis, Seoul National Univ. of Science and Technology, Korea(2009).
16 Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A. and Traverso, M., "Towards Life Cycle Sustainabolity Assessment," Sustainability, 2(10), 3309-3322(2010).   DOI
17 Carlsson Reich, M., "Economic Assessment of Municipal Waste Management Systems-case Studies Using a Combination of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC)," Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 253-263(2005).   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Kim, M. J., Kim, M. H., Kim, Y. S. and Yoo, C. K., "Design of a Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading to Advanced Nutrient Removal Treatment Using Modeling Methodology and Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Process Optimization," Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 48(5), 589-597(2010).
19 Foley, J., Haas, D. D., Hartley, K. and Lant, P., "Comprehensive Life Cycle Inventories of Alternative Wastewater Treatment Systems," Wat. Res., 44, 1654-1666(2010).   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ristimaki, M., Saynajoki, A., Heinonen, J. and Junnila, S., "Combining Life Cycle Costing and Life Cycle Assessment for an Analysis of a New Residential District Energy System Design," Energy, 63, 168-179(2013).   DOI   ScienceOn