1 |
Schrier J. Helium separation using porous graphene membranes. J Phys Chem Lett, 1, 2284 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz100748x.
DOI
|
2 |
Du H, Li J, Zhang J, Su G, Li X, Zhao Y. Separation of hydrogen and nitrogen gases with porous graphene membrane. J Phys Chem C, 115, 23261 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp206258u.
DOI
|
3 |
Jiang D, Cooper VR, Dai S. Porous graphene as the ultimate membrane for gas separation. Nano Lett, 9, 4019 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl9021946.
DOI
|
4 |
Lei G, Liu C, Xie H, Song F. Separation of the hydrogen sulfide and methane mixture by the porous graphene membrane: effect of the charges. Chem Phys Lett, 599, 127 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2014.03.040.
DOI
|
5 |
Shiflett MB, Foley HC. Ultrasonic deposition of high-selectivity nanoporous carbon membranes. Science, 285, 1902 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5435.1902.
DOI
|
6 |
Cimbák Š, Povinec P. 85Kr atmospheric concentration in Bratislava from 1980 to 1983. Environ Int, 11, 65 (1985). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(85)90103-5.
DOI
|
7 |
Yu M, Noble RD, Falconer JL. Zeolite membranes: microstructure characterization and permeation mechanisms. Acc Chem Res, 44, 1196 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar200083e.
DOI
|
8 |
De Vos RM, Verweij H. High-Selectivity, High-flux silica membranes for gas separation. Science, 279, 1710 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5357.1710.
DOI
|
9 |
Schrier J, McClain J. Thermally-driven isotope separation across nanoporous graphene. Chem Phys Lett, 521, 118 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.11.069.
DOI
|
10 |
Li Y, Zhou Z, Shen P, Chen Z. Two-dimensional polyphenylene: experimentally available porous graphene as a hydrogen purification membrane. Chem Commun, 46, 3672 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B926313F.
DOI
|
11 |
Hoover WG. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A, 31, 1695 (1985). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695.
DOI
|
12 |
Lennard-Jones JE. Cohesion. Proc Phys Soc, 43, 461 (1931). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0959-5309/43/5/301.
DOI
|
13 |
Cervellera VR, Albertí M, Huarte-larrañaga F. A molecular dynamics simulation of air adsorption in single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. Int J Quantum Chem, 108, 1714 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qua.21590.
DOI
|
14 |
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics, 14, 33 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5.
DOI
|
15 |
Wang JC, Fichthorn KA. A method for molecular dynamics simulation of confined fluids. J Chem Phys, 112, 8252 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.481430.
DOI
|
16 |
Arora G, Wagner NJ, Sandler SI. Adsorption and diffusion of molecular nitrogen in single wall carbon nanotubes. Langmuir, 20, 6268 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la036432f.
DOI
|
17 |
Suk ME, Aluru NR. Water transport through ultrathin graphene. J Phys Chem Lett, 1, 1590 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz100240r.
DOI
|
18 |
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys, 98, 10089 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.464397.
DOI
|
19 |
Foroutan M, Taghavi Nasrabadi A. Adsorption and separation of binary mixtures of noble gases on single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. Physica E, 43, 851 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2010.10.011.
DOI
|
20 |
Forester TR, Smith W. SHAKE, rattle, and roll: efficient constraint algorithms for linked rigid bodies. J Comput Chem, 19, 102 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19980115)19:1<102::AID-JCC9>3.0.CO;2-T.
DOI
|
21 |
Shih CJ, Lin S, Sharma R, Strano MS, Blankschtein D. Understanding the pH-dependent behavior of graphene oxide aqueous solutions: a comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Langmuir, 28, 235 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la203607w.
DOI
|
22 |
Mi B. Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science, 343, 740 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1250247.
DOI
|
23 |
Joshi RK, Carbone P, Wang FC, Kravets VG, Su Y, Grigorieva IV, Wu HA, Geim AK, Nair RR. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science, 343, 752 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1245711.
DOI
|
24 |
Kim HW, Yoon HW, Yoon SM, Yoo BM, Ahn BK, Cho YH, Shin HJ, Yang H, Paik U, Kwon S, Choi JY, Park HB. Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science, 342, 91 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1236098.
DOI
|
25 |
Guo YN, Lu X, Weng J, Leng Y. Density functional theory study of the interaction of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid with graphene, defective graphene, and graphene oxide. J Phys Chem C, 117, 5708 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp310088e.
DOI
|
26 |
Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys, 117, 1 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ jcph.1995.1039.
DOI
|
27 |
Li H, Song Z, Zhang X, Huang Y, Li S, Mao Y, Ploehn HJ, Bao Y, Yu M. Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science, 342, 95 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1236686.
DOI
|
28 |
Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science, 335, 442 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1211694.
DOI
|
29 |
Peigney A, Laurent C, Flahaut E, Bacsa RR, Rousset A. Specific surface area of carbon nanotubes and bundles of carbon nano-tubes. Carbon, 39, 507 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00155-X.
DOI
|
30 |
Chen D, Feng H, Li J. Graphene oxide: preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem Rev, 112, 6027 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr300115g.
DOI
|
31 |
Zhu Y, James DK, Tour JM. New routes to graphene, graphene oxide and their related applications. Adv Mater, 24, 4924 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202321.
DOI
|
32 |
Kuila T, Mishra AK, Khanra P, Kim NH, Lee JH. Recent advances in the efficient reduction of graphene oxide and its application as energy storage electrode materials. Nanoscale, 5, 52 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2nr32703a.
DOI
|
33 |
Chung C, Kim YK, Shin D, Ryoo SR, Hong BH, Min DH. Biomedical applications of graphene and graphene oxide. Acc Chem Res, 46, 2211 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar300159f.
DOI
|
34 |
Diggikar RS, Late DJ, Kale BB. Unusual morphologies of reduced graphene oxide and polyaniline nanofibers-reduced graphene oxide composites for high performance supercapacitor applications. RSC Adv, 4, 22551 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3RA47834C.
DOI
|
35 |
Smith SC, Ahmed F, Gutierrez KM, Frigi Rodrigues D. A comparative study of lysozyme adsorption with graphene, graphene oxide, and single-walled carbon nanotubes: potential environmental applications. Chem Eng J, 240, 147 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.030.
DOI
|
36 |
Dreyer DR, Jia HP, Bielawski CW. Graphene oxide: a convenient carbocatalyst for facilitating oxidation and hydration reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed, 49, 6813 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201002160.
DOI
|
37 |
Burress JW, Gadipelli S, Ford J, Simmons JM, Zhou W, Yildirim T. Graphene oxide framework materials: theoretical predictions and experimental results. Angew Chem Int Ed, 49, 8902 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201003328.
DOI
|
38 |
Blankenburg S, Bieri M, Fasel R, Müllen K, Pignedoli CA, Passerone D. Porous graphene as an atmospheric nanofilter. Small, 6, 2266 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.201001126.
DOI
|
39 |
Sun C, Boutilier MSH, Au H, Poesio P, Bai B, Karnik R, Hadjiconstantinou NG. Mechanisms of molecular permeation through nanoporous graphene membranes. Langmuir, 30, 675 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la403969g.
DOI
|
40 |
Freedman KJ, Ahn CW, Kim MJ. Detection of long and short DNA using nanopores with graphitic polyhedral edges. ACS Nano, 7, 5008 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn4003665.
DOI
|
41 |
Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev, 39, 228 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B917103G.
DOI
|
42 |
Kim JE, Han TH, Lee SH, Kim JY, Ahn CW, Yun JM, Kim SO. Graphene oxide liquid crystals. Angew Chem Int Ed, 50, 3043 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201004692.
DOI
|
43 |
Huh S, Park J, Kim YS, Kim KS, Hong BH, Nam JM. UV/ozoneoxidized large-scale graphene platform with large chemical enhancement in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano, 5, 9799 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn204156n.
DOI
|
44 |
Koenig SP, Wang L, Pellegrino J, Bunch JS. Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat Nanotechnol, 7, 728 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.162.
DOI
|
45 |
Bagri A, Mattevi C, Acik M, Chabal YJ, Chhowalla M, Shenoy VB. Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nat Chem, 2, 581 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.686.
DOI
|
46 |
Park HB, Jung CH, Lee YM, Hill AJ, Pas SJ, Mudie ST, Van Wagner E, Freeman BD, Cookson DJ. Polymers with cavities tuned for fast selective transport of small molecules and ions. Science, 318, 254 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1146744.
DOI
|
47 |
Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306, 666 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896.
DOI
|
48 |
Bunch JS, Verbridge SS, Alden JS, van der Zande AM, Parpia JM, Craighead HG, McEuen PL. Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. Nano Lett, 8, 2458 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl801457b.
DOI
|
49 |
Tao Y, Xue Q, Liu Z, Shan M, Ling C, Wu T, Li X. Tunable hydrogen separation in porous graphene membrane: first-principle and molecular dynamic simulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 6, 8048 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am4058887.
DOI
|