Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5714/CL.2010.11.4.279

Influence of Processing on Morphology, Electrical Conductivity and Flexural Properties of Exfoliated Graphite Nanoplatelets-Polyamide Nanocomposites  

Liu, Wanjun (Composite Materials and Structures Center, 2100 Engineering Building, Michigan State University)
Do, In-Hwan (Composite Materials and Structures Center, 2100 Engineering Building, Michigan State University)
Fukushima, Hiroyuki (Composite Materials and Structures Center, 2100 Engineering Building, Michigan State University)
Drzal, Lawrence T. (Composite Materials and Structures Center, 2100 Engineering Building, Michigan State University)
Publication Information
Carbon letters / v.11, no.4, 2010 , pp. 279-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
Graphene is one of the most promising materials for many applications. It can be used in a variety of applications not only as a reinforcement material for polymer to obtain a combination of desirable mechanical, electrical, thermal, and barrier properties in the resulting nanocomposite but also as a component in energy storage, fuel cells, solar cells, sensors, and batteries. Recent research at Michigan State University has shown that it is possible to exfoliate natural graphite into graphite nanoplatelets composed entirely of stacks of graphene. The size of the platelets can be controlled from less than 10 nm in thickness and diameters of any size from sub-micron to 15 microns or greater. In this study we have investigated the influence of melt compounding processing on the physical properties of a polyamide 6 (PA6) nanocomposite reinforced with exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets (xGnP). The morphology, electrical conductivity, and mechanical properties of xGnP-PA6 nanocomposite were characterized with electrical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, AC impedance, and mechanical properties. It was found that counter rotation (CNR) twins crew processed xGnP/PA6 nanocomposite had similar mechanical properties with co-rotation (CoR) twin screw processed or with CoR conducted with a screw design modified for nanoparticles (MCoR). Microscopy showed that the CNR processed nanocomposite had better xGnP dispersion than the (CoR) twin screw processed and modified screw (MCoR) processed ones. It was also found that the CNR processed nanocomposite at a given xGnP content showed the lowest graphite X-ray diffraction peak at $26.5^{\circ}$ indicating better xGnP dispersion in the nanocomposite. In addition, it was also found that the electrical conductivity of the CNR processed 12 wt.% xGnP-PA6 nanocomposite is more than ten times higher than the CoR and MCoR processed ones. These results indicate that better dispersion of an xGnP-PA6 nanocomposite is attainable in CNR twins crew processing than conventional CoR processing.
Keywords
Exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet; Polyamide; Nanocomposites; Electrical conductivity; Flexural property;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dennis, H. R.; Hunter, D. L.; Chang, D.; Kim, S.; White, J. L.; Cho, J. W.; Paul, D. R. Polymer 2001, 42, 9513.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Treece, M. A.; Zhang, W.; Moffit, R. D.; Oberhauser, J. P. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 898.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Georga, R. E.; Cohen, R. E. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. 2004, 42, 2690.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Fukushima, H. "Graphite Nanoreinforcements in Polymer Nanocomposites", Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A., 2003.
5 Giannelis, E. P. Appl. Organometalic Chem. 1998, 12, 675.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Drzal, L. T.; Fukushima, H. "Expanded graphite, preparation of platelets, and nanocomposite products", Pat. Appl. Publ., U.S., 2004.
7 Drzal, L. T.; Fukushima, H. "Expanded graphite and products produced therefore", Pat. Appl. Publ., U.S., 2006.
8 Drzal, L. T.; Fukushima, H. Proc. 17th annual technical conference on American Society for Composites, 2002.
9 Yasmin, A.; Daniel, I. M. Polymer 2004, 45, 8211.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kalaitzidou, K.; Fukushima, H.; Drzal, L. T. Carbon 2007, 45, 1446.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Pinnavaia, T. J.; Beall, G. W. "Polymer Clay Nanocomposites", John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2000, Chap. 6.
12 Fukushima, H.; Drzal, L. T.; Rook, B. P.; Rich, M. J. J. Therm. Anal. Calori. 2006, 85, 235.   DOI
13 Miloaga, D. G.; Hosein, H. A.; Misra, M.; Drzal, L. T. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106, 2548.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lu, J.; Drzal, L. T.; Worden, R. M.; Lee, I. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 6240.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Krishnamoorti, R. MRS Bulletin 2007, 32, 341.   DOI
16 Hunter, D. L.; Karena, K. W.; Paul, D. R. MRS Bulletin 2007, 32,323.   DOI
17 Ryu, S. H.; Chang, Y. W. Polymer Bulletin 2005, 55, 385.   DOI
18 Gianelli, W.; Camino, G.; Dintcheva, N. T.; Verso, S. L.; Mantia, F. P. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2004, 289, 238.   DOI   ScienceOn