Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2016.34.4.223

The Study of Genetic Diversity for Drought Tolerance in Maize  

Kim, Hyo Chul (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Lee, Yong Ho (O-Jeong Eco-Resilience Institute, Korea University)
Kim, Kyung-Hee (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Shin, Seungho (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Song, Kitae (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Moon, Jun-Cheol (Agriculture and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Byung-Moo (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Kim, Jae Yoon (College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environmental Biology / v.34, no.4, 2016 , pp. 223-232 More about this Journal
Abstract
Drought is one of important environmental stress for plant. Drought has deleterious effect to plant growth including maize (Zea mays L.) such as vegetative and/or reproductive growth, root extension, photosynthesis efficiency, flowering, anthesis-silking interval (ASI), fertilization, and grain filling. In this study, we screened drought tolerant maize in 21 cultivars from different sources, sixteen NAM parent lines (B73, CML103, CML228, CML247, CML277, CML322, CML333, CML69, Ki11, Ki3, Ky21, M37W, Mo18w, NC350, Oh43 and Tx303), four Korean hybrids (Cheongdaok, Gangdaok, Kwangpyeongok and Pyeonganok) and one Southeast Asian genotype (DK9955). Drought stress (DS) index was evaluated with leaf rolling score at seedling stage and ASI at silking date. The leaf rolling scoring of CML228, DK9955 and Ki11 were determined 1.28, 1.85, 1.86, respectively. However, M37W, Kwangpyeongok, B73 and NC350 were determined over the 3. ASI analysis revealed that CML228, CML103, Cheongdaok, NC350, B73, CML322, Kwangpyeongok and Ki11 are represented less than 5 days under DS and less than 3 days of difference between DS and well-watered (WW), but CML69, Ki3, Pyeonganok, M37W, Mo18w and Gangdaok were represented more than 10 days under DS and more than 8 days of difference between DS and WW. Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis determined CML228, Ki11, and CML322 were regarded as drought tolerance cultivars. Eventually, Ki11 showed genetic similarity with Korean cultivars by QTL analysis and MDS analysis. Ki11 has a potential for development of drought tolerance maize with Korean cultivars.
Keywords
Zea mays L.; genetic diversity; drought stress; leaf rolling; anthesis-silking interval (ASI); phylogenic tree;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Makumbi D, JF Betran, M Banzinger and JM Ribaut. 2011. Combining ability, heterosis and genetic diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress conditions. Euphytica 180:143-162.   DOI
2 Meeks M, SC Murray, S Hague and D Hays. 2013. Measuring maize seedling drought response in search of tolerant germplasm. Agronomy 3:135-147.   DOI
3 Kim JY, JC Moon, SB Baek, YU Kwon and BM Lee. 2014. Genetic improvement of maize by marker-assisted breeding. Korean J. Crop Sci. 59:109-127.   DOI
4 Lee EA and WF Tracy. 2009. Modern maize breeding. pp. 141-160. In Handbook of Maize (Bennetzen JL and SC Hake eds.). Springer.
5 Lee M, EB Godshalk, KR Lamkey and WL Woodman. 1989. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci. 29:1067-1071.   DOI
6 Livini C, PA Marsan, AE Melchinger, MM Messmer and M Motto. 1992. Genetic diversity of maize inbred lines within and among heterotic groups revealed by RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:17-25.
7 Godshalk EB, M Lee and KR Lamkey. 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:273-280.
8 Gonzalo M, TJ Vyn, JB Holland and LM McIntyre. 2006. Mapping density response in maize: A direct approach for testing genotype and treatment interactions. Gent. 173:331-348.
9 Hall AJ, JH Lemcoff and N Trapani. 1981. Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effects on yield, its components, and their determinants. Maydica 26:19-38.
10 Goodman MM and RM Bird. 1977. The races of maize IV: tentative grouping of 219 Latin American races. Econ. Bot. 31:204-221.   DOI
11 Heckenberger M, AE Melchinger, JS Ziegle, LK Joe, JD Hauser, M Hutton and M Bohn. 2002. Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines with regard to the identification of essentially derived varieties. I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data. Mol. Breed. 10:181-191.   DOI
12 Betran FJ, D Beck, M Banziger and GO Edmeades. 2003. Genetic analysis of inbred and hybrid yield under stress and nonstress environments in tropical maize. Crop Sci. 43:807-817.   DOI
13 Dice LR. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297-302.   DOI
14 Dubreuil P, P Dufour, E Krejci, M Causse, D de Vienne, A Gallais and A Charcosset. 1996. Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci. 36:790-799.   DOI
15 Eghball B and JW Maranville. 1993. Root development and nitrogen influx of corn genotypes grown under combined drought and nitrogen stresses. Agron. J. 85:147-152.   DOI
16 Banzinger M, GO Edmeades, DL Beck and M Bellon. 2000. Breeding for drought and N stress tolerance in maize: from theory to practice. CIMMYT, Mexico, D. F.
17 Barata C and MJ Carena. 2006. Classification of North Dakota maize inbred lines into heterotic groups based on molecular and testcross data. Euphytica 151:339-349.   DOI
18 Andersen MN, F Asch, Y Wu, CR Jensen, H Naested, VO Mogensen and KE Koch. 2002. Soluble invertase expression is an early target of drought stress during the critical, abortion sensitive phase of young ovary development in maize. Plant Physiol. 130:591-604.   DOI
19 Barrett BA and KK Kidwell. 1998. AFLP-based genetic diversity assessment among wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Sci. 38:1261-1271.   DOI
20 Bernardo R. 1996. Testcross selection prior to further inbreeding in maize: mean performance and realized genetic variance. Crop Sci. 36:867-871.   DOI
21 Saker MM, SS Youssef, NA Abdallah, HS Bashandy and AM El Sharkawy. 2005. Genetic analysis of some Egyptian rice genotypes using RAPD, SSR and AFLP. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4:882-890.
22 Sari-Gorla M, P Krajewski, ND Fonzo, M Villa and C Frova. 1999. Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize by molecular markers. II. Plant height and flowering. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:289-295.   DOI
23 Semagn K, C Magorokosho, SV Bindiganavile, D Makumbi, Y Beyene, S Mugo, BM Prasanna and ML Warburton. 2012. Molecular characterization of diverse CIMMYT maize inbred lines from eastern and southern Africa using single nucleotide polymorphic markers. BMC Genomics 13:113.   DOI
24 Senior ML, JP Murphy, MM Goodman and CW Stuber. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38:1088-1098.   DOI
25 Smith CW, J Betran and ECA Runge. 2004. Corn: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley series in crop science. pp. 358-360.
26 Nassiry MR, A Javanmard and R Tohidi. 2009. Application of statistical procedures for analysis of genetic diversity in domestic animal populations. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 4:136.   DOI
27 Smith JSC. 1984. Genetic variability within US hybrid maize: multi-variate analysis of isozyme data. Crop Sci. 24:1041-1046.   DOI
28 Smith JSC and OS Smith. 1992. Fingerprinting crop varieties. Adv. Agron. 47:85-140.
29 Smith JSC, ECL Chin, H Shu, OS Smith, SJ Wall, ML Senior, SE Mitchell, S Kresovich and J Ziegle. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163-173.   DOI
30 Smith OS, JSC Smith, SL Bowen, RA Tenborg and SJ Wall. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:833-840.
31 Pandey RK, JW Maranville and A Admou. 2000a. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: I. Grain yield and yield components. Agric. Water Manage. 46:1-13.   DOI
32 Pandey RK, JW Maranville and MM Chetima. 2000b. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: II. Shoot growth, nitrogen uptake and water extraction. Agric. Water Manage. 46:15-7.   DOI
33 Park JS, KJ Sa, KJ Park, JS Jang and JK Lee. 2009. Genetic variation of parental inbred lines for Korean waxy corn hybrid varieties revealed by SSR markers. Korean J. Breed Sci. 41:106-114.
34 Paterniani E and JH Lonnquist. 1963. Heterosis in interracial crosses of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 3:504-507.   DOI
35 Moll RH, JH Lonnquist, JV Fortuna and EC Johnson. 1965. The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139-144.
36 Pinto LR, MLC Vieira, CL de Souza and AP de Souza. 2003. Genetic diversity assessed by microsatellites in tropical maize population submitted to highdensity reciprocal recurrent selection. Euphytica 134:277-286.   DOI
37 Reif JC, AE Melchinger, XC Xia, ML Warburton, DA Hoisington, SK Vasal, D Beck, M Bohn and M Frisch. 2003. Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:947-957.   DOI
38 Melchinger AE and PK Gumber. 1998. Overview of heterosis and heterotic groups in agronomic crops. pp. 29-44. In Concepts and breeding of heterosis in crop plants (Lamkey KR and JE Staub eds.). CSSA, Madison.
39 Melchinger AR, J Boppenmaier, BS Dhillon, WG Pollmer and RG Herrmann. 1992. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds : II. Relation to performance of hybrids within versus between heterotic groups for forage traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:672-681.
40 Min H, C Chen, S Wei, X Shang, M Sun, R Xia, X Liu, D Hao, H Chen and Q Xie. 2016. Identification of drought tolerant mechanisms in maize Seedlings based on trascriptome analysis of recombination inbred lines. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1080.
41 Souza SGH, V Carpentieri-Pipolo, CF Ruas, VP Carvalho, PM Ruas and AC Gerage. 2008. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity among the maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.) obtained by RAPD and SSR markers. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 51:183-192.   DOI
42 Thompson JA and RL Nelson. 1998. Utilization of diverse germplasm for soybean yield improvement. Crop Sci. 38:1362-1368.   DOI
43 Troyer AF. 1999. Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci. 39:601-626.   DOI
44 Warburton ML, X Xianchun, J Crossa, P Dubreuil and FJ Betran. 2002. Genetic characterization of CIMMYT inbred maize lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop Sci. 42:1832-1840.   DOI
45 Udomprasert N, J Kijjanon, K Chusri-iam and A Machuay. 2005. Effects of water deficit at tasseling on photosynthesis, development, and yield of corn. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 39:546-551.
46 Riede CR and JA Anderson. 1996. Linkage of RFLP markers to an aluminum tolerance gene in wheat. Crop Sci. 36:905-909.   DOI
47 Van Inghelandt D, AE Melchinger, C Lebreton and B Stich. 2010. Population structure and genetic diversity in a commercial maize breeding program assessed with SSR and SNP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120:1289-1299.   DOI
48 Varshney RK, JM Ribaut, ES Buckler, R Tuberosa, A Rafalski and P Langridgem. 2012. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:1172-1176.   DOI
49 Warburton ML, JC Reif, M Frisch, M Bohn, C Bedoya, XC Xia, J Crossa, J Franco, D Hoisington, K Pixley, S Taba and AE Melchinger. 2008. Genetic diversity in CIMMYT non-temperate maize germplasm: landraces, open pollinated varieties, and inbred lines. Crop Sci. 48:617-624.   DOI
50 Song KT, KH Kim, HC Kim, JC Moon, JY Kim, SB Baek, YU Kwon and BM Lee. 2015. Evaluation of drought tolerance in maize seedling using leaf rolling. Korean J. Crop Sci. 60:8-16.
51 Ajmone-Marsan P, P Castiglioni, F Fusari, M Kuiper and M Motto. 1998. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:219-227.   DOI
52 Sneath PHA and RR Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification.
53 Lu Y, J Yan, GT Guimaraes, S Taba, Z Hao, S Gao, S Chen, J Li, S Zhang, BS Vivek, C Magorokosho, S Mugo, D Makumbi, SN Parentoni, T Shah, T Rong, JH Crouch and Y Xu. 2009. Molecular characterization of global maize breeding germplasm based on genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120:93-115.   DOI