Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2021.25.6.70

Comparative Analysis of the Roles and Identities of Artists and Fashion designers  

Suh, Seunghee (Dept. of Fashion Design, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Fashion Business / v.25, no.6, 2021 , pp. 70-80 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the identities and roles so that they can grasp their social roles and directions. Artists show a change in identity from the deification of modern artists with freedom and genius to artists who challenge the cognitive aspect of art and redefine the scope and concept of artists by expanding their social role. Artists dreaming of an ideal art utopia, in which art, society, politics, and daily life are coordinated, are constantly presenting the social role and direction of art through the combination and challenge of new ways of art and craft, beauty and function, creative imagination, and public service. Fashion designers act as contemporary genius artists, creators who express the appearance of the times, practitioners who advocate social values and changes, members of business in the fashion system, celebrities who are spotlighted by the public at the center of the fashion industry, or fashion influencers. Thus, fashion designers are complex or selective in their role depending on the fashion philosophy of individual designers or location given within the fashion system. They are becoming the subject of creating the culture of the times by expressing social ideology or playing a role in practicing art in life that leads social culture so as to raise the value of fashion in their development and satisfy cultural enjoyment of fashion consumers who consume art in everyday life.
Keywords
art; artist; fashion; fashion designer; identity; social role;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. (J. A. Underwood, Trans.). London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1935).
2 Crane, D. (2012). Boundaries: Using cultural theory to unravel the complex relationship between fashion and art. In A. Geczy, & V. Karaminas (Eds.), Fashion and art (pp. 99-110). Oxford, England: Berg.
3 Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4 Kang, C. (2021). The myth of artist-led gentrification: A critical analyse on the role of the artist as a pioneer of gentrification. The Korean Journal of Art and Media, 20(1). 11-37.
5 Park, J., & Lee, J. (2010). The role of fashion creative director. Journal of Korea Design Forum, 28, 221-230. doi: 10.21326/ksdt.2010..28.020   DOI
6 Shiner, L. (2001). The innovation of art. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7 Suh, S. (2013). Artification of fashion through the expansion of contemporary art (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
8 Suh, S. (2016). Essentials of fashion as art from the perspective of George Dickie's institutional theory of art. Journal of Fashion Business, 20(5). 1-15. doi:10.12940/jfb.2016.20.5.1   DOI
9 Kim, H. (2009). Study on roles that artists play in contemporary art (Unpublished master's thesis). Hongik University, Seoul, Korea.
10 Kim, D. (2010). The role of neo-bohemian in urban revitalization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Jeonbuk University, Jeonju, Korea.
11 Kim, S. (1993). 패션디자인과 예술의 관계에 대한 소고 [A Study on the relationship between fashion design and art]. Collected Papers of Hansung University, 17(1), 525-546.
12 Song, M. (2003). 미술사와 근현대 [Art history and modern times]. Seoul: Sungshin Women's University Press.
13 Kim, H. (2005). Change in design environment by the integrated thought and role of designers in fashion design (Unpublished master's thesis). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
14 Wolff, J. (1993). Aesthetics and the sociology of art. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
15 Kawamura, Y. (2005). Fashion-ology: An introduction to fashion studies. Oxford, England: Berg.