Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2020.24.6.135

Students' Online Fashion Studio Class Experience and Factors Affecting Their Class Satisfaction  

Lee, Jungmin (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University)
Lee, MiYoung (Dept. of Fashion Design & Textiles, Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of Fashion Business / v.24, no.6, 2020 , pp. 135-147 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study explored students' online fashion studio class experiences, and investigated the factors affecting their class satisfaction. An online survey of college students who were enrolled in online studio classes within apparel and fashion-related departments during the spring of 2020 was conducted in June 2020. Responses from a total of 213 participants were included in the final data. Respondents rated lecture clips as the most useful, followed by teacher demonstration and feedback, PowerPoint (PPT) supplements, and Q&As. Frequently mentioned areas of improvement were online platform stability and video quality. Many respondents also stated that more streamlined teacher-student communication channels, immediate and meticulous teacher feedback, the adoption of course contents developed specifically for an online environment, and provisions for equipment usage would be desirable. Student satisfaction of an online fashion design studio class was significantly affected by teaching presence, social presence, online learning system stability, perceived usefulness of teacher's demonstration, and affective response toward COVID-19. Students satisfaction of an online garment construction studio class was significantly affected by teaching and social presence, online learning system stability, and perceived usefulness of teacher's demonstration. Based on these findings, we recommend developing teaching contents and methods that allow students to feel included in class and establish an online system with various functions to enhance the sense of social connection that can enable two-way communication.
Keywords
online course; online studio; class satisfaction; teaching presence; social presence;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lim, H.-J., & Park, H.-W. (2005). Avatar application for fashion cyber education. Journal of Fashion Business, 9(4), 1-15.
2 Ministry of Education. (2018). 일반대학의 원격수업 운영기준 [Operating standards for distance learning course at universities]. Retrieved June 1, 2020, from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=337&boardSeq=75423&lev=0&m=0201
3 Oh, M. (2020). The effect of self-regulation learning, teaching presence, and academic achievement in the K-MOOC setting. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 16(2), 191-212. doi:10.26857/JLLS.2020.5.16.2.191   DOI
4 Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430. doi:10.1086/209358   DOI
5 Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00294.x   DOI
6 Park, E. J. (2020). "등록금 깎아 달라"...대학 온라인 강의에 대한 불만 속출 ["Lower the tuition"...Complaints about online lectures at universities]. KBS News. Retrieved September 7, 2020, from http://news.kbs.co.kr
7 Reio Jr., T. G., & Crim, S. J. (2013). Social presence and student satisfaction as predictors of online enrollment intent. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 122-133. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.775801   DOI
8 Seo, C., & Lee, S. (2009). An empirical study on the factors affecting e-learning learners satisfaction. The Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 1-25. doi:10.5859/KAIS.2009.18.3.001   DOI
9 Ryu, J. (2007). Critical factors of learner satisfaction in e-learning for corporation. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, 9(1), 121-142.
10 Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. A. (2010). The indicators of instructor presence that are important to students in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 767-779.
11 UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 impact on education. Retrieved September 1, 2020, from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
12 VanVoorhis, C. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43-50. doi:10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043   DOI
13 Baek, S. (2003). A study on the possibility of applying blended learning to design education - Focused on the survey of learners' satisfaction -. Archives of Design Research, 16(4), 443-452.
14 Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become? TechTrends, 51(2), 28-34. doi:10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y   DOI
15 Lee, H. J., & Kim, T. H. (2008). Influence of e-Learning contents type on learning outcome. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 4(1), 75-94. doi:10.26857/JLLS.2008.05.4.1.75   DOI
16 Alsadoon, E. (2018). The impact of social presence on learners' satisfaction in mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 226-233.
17 Bangert, A. (2008). The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(1), 34-61. doi:10.1007/BF03033431   DOI
18 Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. doi:10.1080/08923640109527071   DOI
19 Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241-254.
20 Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
21 Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101. doi:10.1177/002224298204600314   DOI
22 Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Reseaching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001   DOI
23 Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2   DOI
24 Heo, G. (2008). A study on the structural equation model for students' satisfaction in the blended leaning environment. Korean Society for Internet Information, 10(1), 135-143.
25 Jang, D.-H., & Cho, S.-K. (2017). Is the mid-point of a Likert-type scale necessary?: Comparison between the scales with or without the mid-point. Survey Research, 18(4), 1-24. doi:10.20997/SR.18.4.1   DOI
26 Jang, J., & Kim, H. (2009). E-learning system using learner created contents based on social network. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 9(6), 17-24. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2009.9.6.017   DOI
27 Kang, M., Lee, J., Hahn. J., & Lee, J. (2010). Investigating the relationships among perceived tutor's roles, social presence and learning outcomes in online discussion. The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD, 6(4), 159-183.
28 Joo, Y., Ha, Y., Kim, E., & You, J. (2010). The structural relationship among teaching presence, cognitive presence, social presence, and learning outcome in cyber university. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 14(2), 175-188.
29 Joo, Y.-J., Kim, E.-K., & Park, S.-Y. (2009). The structural relationship among cognitive presence, flow and learning outcome in corporate cyber education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(3), 21-38.
30 Jung, D. B. (2004). A study on the effect of design education on the operating of the long distance education: Focused on the multimedia department of Seoul Digital University. Archives of Design Research, 17(4), 279-288.
31 Kang, M., Park, I., & Lee, S. (2009). A study on the instructional effects of revision, reuse, and interactive media application in e-learning content of cyber universities. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(1), 1-22.
32 Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of Distance Education. London: Routledge.
33 Kim, J. S. (2007). An explorative study on the determinants of e-learning performance and its pedagogical implication. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 15(3), 101-125.
34 Kim, J. S. (2009). The Structural relationship between presence and the effectiveness of e-Learning in the corporate setting (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
35 Kim, M. (2011). Web-based e-learning system supporting an effective self-directed learning environment. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(9), 524-535. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.9.524   DOI
36 Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2013). Instructor presence in online course and student satisfaction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(1), Article 13. doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070113   DOI
37 Kim, Y. R. (2020, October 12). 대학 원격수업, 학생 48.1% "대학 준비 부족했다" [University distance learning, 48.1% of students "lack of college preparation"]. 한국교육신문 [Korea Education Newspaper]. Retrieved October 30, 2020, from https://www.hangyo.com
38 Ku, Y., Ahn, J., & Noh, G.-Y. (2020). Relationships between particulate matter risk perception, information seeking and preventive behaviors: An application of extended risk information seeking and processing model. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 34(1), 5-28.
39 Kwon, S. (2011). Examining the relationships among teaching presence, learning approaches, learners' perception of satisfaction and effectiveness in online learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 535-560.   DOI
40 Kwon, Y. J., & Rhew, S. (2018). Teaching a fashion design studio course in distance education: A case study. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 68(5), 107-127. doi:10.7233/jksc.2018.68.5.107   DOI