Browse > Article

A Study on the Recognition of Korean Image Fashion Designs by U.K Fashion Specialists  

Park, Hye-Won (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Changwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Fashion Business / v.8, no.2, 2004 , pp. 69-90 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find the recognition of Korean image fashion design by U.K fashion specialists. U.K is one of the important countries in design field including fashion design since 1960. For this purpose, literature research and focus individual interview research were carried. First, through the researches precedent, it was found that a national image is related with it's design industry and what is Korean image fashion design, were studied. Second, for individual interviews to 13 U.K fashion specialists, who are teaching and researching in University that has postgraduate course over M.A and had industrial experiences from 7years to 22years, were progressed using open questions and visual image stimulus. The open questions were consisted with four parts : personal educational and industrial background, recognitions about oriental fashion, recognitions about Korean image and Korean fashion design before seeing the visual stimulus, recognition about Korean image fashion design and the characteristics of Korean after seeing the visual stimulus. The results are as follows; First, the 12 U.K specialists have recognized 'oriental fashion' is one of important fashion trends now a days. Japan and Japanese designers are recognized as a represented nation and designer in oriental fashion by them. Two of the specialists referred to need changing the term 'oriental' because the term has been used in the sights of western from colonial age and Japanese is not included the oriental any more. Secondly, 11 interviews have recognized nothing about the Korean national image some of them has negative image due to political situation in Korean Peninsula. However 2 interviews who had been Korea before has positive image. In the questions about Korean fashion and Korean fashion designers, 10 of 13 interviews have nothing and negative recognitions. So it was founded that Korean fashion design was recognized as a lower level by U. K. fashion specialists. Thirdly, in the questions about Korean fashion image and the design characteristics of Korean fashion after seeing the visual stimulus, the response was represented two directions. One is about over decorative image through ethnic design and the other is about simple image differ from Japanese. The 13 interviews felt the Korean Image fashion design such like traditional, decorative, opulent, flat cutting, fresh proportion, loose, layering, natural, simplicity, complicate, adventure, easy, stylish, soft, feminine, young image, adult sexy image. The images were analyzed five image groups : adult sexy image, adult ethnic image, natural image, young avant-garde image, young simple casual image. No one preferred the adult sexy image, adult ethnic image and natural image. However 10 interviews preferred young avant-garde group and 13 interviews preferred the young simple casual image. So this group can be understanded and useful informed as one of competitive power in global fashion industry.
Keywords
Korean image; oriental; fashion design; recognition; focused interview; U. K. fashion specialist;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김인경(1995). 한국적 패션디자인의 특성에 관한 연구-1980년대 이후를 중심으로-. 한국의류학회. 19(3). 538-540
2 윤보연, 배수정(2001). 현대패션에 반영된 전통 미의식의 연구-한국과 일본의 비교연구를 중심으로-. 패션비즈니스. 5(4). 56-72
3 장수경(2002). 미국대학생이 인지하는 한국전통문양의 감성이미지, 한국의류학회, 26(3/4), 402-411
4 최은경, 심화진 (2004). 한국 전통 복식이미지의 세계화를 위한 연구. 2004년 한국패션비즈니스학회 춘계학술대회. 구두발표
5 앞 글
6 정경원(2003). 앞 글
7 앞 글
8 최현수(2003). 우리문화 속 디자인 파워 : 전통의 재해석, 현대화. www.lg.co.kr, 2003. 10. 02
9 앞 글
10 산업자원부 2004년도 섬유산업비전. www.mocie.go.kr
11 오현정. 오선희. 이귀례(2003). 문인화를 이용한 한국적 이미지의 문화상품용 의상디자인 개발. 복식. Vol.53. No.5. pp13-22 김희정. 이경희(2000). 동양적 복식디자인의 특성과 이미지 연구-한국, 중국, 일본을 중심으로-. 의류학회지. Vol.24. No.8. pp1001-1010 최경희. 엄준희. 김민자(2003). 한국적 이미지의 경기용 수영복 디자인 개발에 관한 연구(II).-오방색과 태극문을 중심으로-. 복식. Vol. 53. No.4. pp49-69 추선형. 김영인(2002). 패션소재의 색채 이미지와 질감에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지. Vol.26. No.2. pp193-204
12 양현미(2000). 상대방의 기대를 배려하는 이미지정책을 세워야'. 2003.8.3 www.kcaf.or.kr
13 Locker, S. 1993. Dress and the Dynamics of Culture : Implication for theory, methods and content. In Lennon, S.J. & Burns, . L. D. Aspect of Dress: New Directions. ITAA Special Publication # 5 (재인용) 김현식. 2000. 의복과 문화적 접근 : 질적연구방법의 중요성. 의류학회지 24. 4. p513
14 조규화(1997). 한국패션에 나타난 미의식. 패션비즈니스, 1(2), 1-19
15 금기숙(1999). 패션디자인을 위한 전통 복식의 활용 현황에 관한 연구. 복식 43. 69-81
16 앞 글
17 공미선, 채금석(2004). 세계시장을 위한 한국적 패션디자인의 개발. 복식. 54(2). 1-9
18 정경원(2003). '집중기획/ 한국의 이미지'. www.kcaf.or.kr. 2003. 10. 02
19 Ann Marie Fiore & Patricia Ann Kimle. 1997. Understanding Aesthetics for the Merchandising & Design Professional. New York. Fairchild Publication. pp348-351
20 박은주, 은영자(1999). 1990년대 패션에 나타난 오리엔탈리즘에 관한 연구, 복식 43. 259-282
21 앞 글. p.8
22 정경원(2003). 앞 글
23 Kyung-Seob Kim, Hye-Won Park. A Research on the Present of Korean Fashion Designers who Advanced to Paris and on the Characteristics of their Works. 2001.8.2-4. 19th International Costume Association Congress. pp124-125
24 공미선. 채금석(2004). 앞 글. p.4