Browse > Article

Petrochemical and Physical Characteristics of the Cretaceous Pink Granites in the Jinan Area  

윤현수 (한국지질자원연구원 지질환경재해연구부)
홍세선 (한국지질자원연구원 지질환경재해연구부)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Petrological Society of Korea / v.13, no.3, 2004 , pp. 161-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Cretaceous pink granites of the finan area, southwestern Ogcheon belt, are adjacently developed in the eastern part (Keg) and western part (Kwg) as stocks, respectively. Keg of rounded shape occur as mainly medium-coarse grained rocks, whereas Kwg of ellipsoidal shape occurs as medium-coarse grained ones with partly porphyritic and fine-grained textures. Miarolitic cavities of them are often seen and can be observed more frequently in Kwg than Keg. Rose and counter fracture diagrams of the two granites show that Keg and Kwg have more potentiality of non-dimension and dimension to non-dimension stones, respectively. Physical properties such as porosity and absorption ratio have 0.25% and 0.65%, and 0.43% and 1.11%, respectively, which could suggest that emissions of gas phase at later magma stages are abundant in Kwg than those of Keg. From the major and trace elements petrochemisoy, they belong to acidic, peraluminous and calc-alkaline rocks, showing that Kwg are later product than Keg of the same granitic parent magma. REE concentrations normalized to chondrite value have trends of gradual and parallel enriched LREE and depleted HREE. Eu negative anomalies of Kwg are far more severe than those of Keg, which suggest that plagioclase fractionation in Kwg was much stronger than that of Keg. In the magnetic susceptibility vs. petrochemical and modal parameters, they all belong to magnetite-series and I-types, and can be classified as weakly-moderately ferromagnetic rocks. And the above relations could suggest that their susceptibility values are more mainly depended on ferromagnetic opaques than ferromagnetic and paramagnetic assemblages (Bt + Ch + Ser + Op).
Keywords
Jinan; Cretaceous; pink granites; physical properties; magnetic susceptibility; magnetite-series;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 홍세선, 2004, 국내 중생대 화강암의 대자율특성과 화학조성. 암석학회지 13, 16-33
2 홍승호, 최위찬, 1978, 금산 지질도폭 설명서. 자원개발연구소, 29p
3 Ague, J.J. and Brimhall, G.H., 1988, Regional variations inbulk chemistry, mineralogy, and the compositions of mafic and accessory minerals in the batholiths of Califor-nia. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bulletin, 100, 891-911
4 Blevin, P.L., 1996, Using magnetic susceptibility meters tointerpret the oxidation state of granitic rocks: 13th Aus-tralian Geological Convention. Geol. Soc. Aust., Absts. 41, 40
5 Jin, M.S., Lee, Y.S. and Ishihara, S., 2001, Granitoids andtheir magnetic susceptibility in South Korea. Resource Geol, 51, 189-203
6 Taylor, S.R. and McLennan, S.M., 1985, The continentalcrust: its composition and evolution. Blackwell, Oxford., 312p
7 White, A.J.R. and Chappell, B.W., 1983, Granitoid types and their distribution in the Lanchlan fold belt, Southeast-ern Australia. Geol. Soc. Am. Memoir 159. 21-34
8 홍승호, 이병주, 김원영, 1980, 무주 지질도폭 설명서. 자원개발연구소, 28p
9 Taylor, S.R., 1965, The application of trace element data toproblems in petrology. Phy. Chem. Ear., 6, 133-213
10 Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J.R., 1974, Two contrastinggranite types. Pacific Geol., 8. 173-174
11 김정환, 이인기, 1973, 용담 지질도폭 설명서. 국립지질연구소, 25p
12 Blevin, P.L., 1994, Magnetic susceptibility of the Lanchlan Fold Belt and New England batholith granites: AMIRA Project P147B final report(unpub.)
13 Takahashi, M., Aramaki, S. and Ishihara, S., 1980, Magne-tite-sehes/Ilmenite-series vs. I-type/S-type granitoids. Min-ing Geol. Spec. Issue, 8, 12-28
14 윤현수, 박용순, 이춘오, 이병대, 김경수, 1993, 문경-상주사이에 분포하는 화강암류 석재의 암석학적 특성. 암석학회지 2, 32-40
15 진명식, 신성천, 김성재, 주승환, 지세정, 1994, 옥천습곡대중서부지역 화강암과 반심성암의 동위원소연대와 화성활동사. KR-93-1G-2, 한국자원연구소, 54p
16 진호일, 민경원, 전효택, 박영석, 1995, 금산지역에 분포하는 화강암류의 암석지구화학. 자원환경지질, 28, 123-137
17 이대성, 남기상, 1969, 장기리 지질도폭 설명서. 국립지질연구소, 33p
18 김옥준, 1971, 남한의 신기 화강암류의 관입시기와 지각변동. 광산지질, 4, 1-10
19 Ishihara, S., 1977, The magnetite-seiies and ilmenite-seriesgranitic rocks. Min. Geol., 27, 293-305
20 Daly, R.A., Manger, G.E. and Clark, Jr, S.R, 1966, Densityof Rocks. In Handbook of physical constants(ed. S.P.Clark, Jr.), Geol. Soc. Am., Mem., 97, 20-26
21 Hyndman, D.W., 1985, Petrology of igneous and metamor-phic rocks. McGraw-Hill Book Co., 786p
22 Mason, B. and Moore, C.B., 1982, Principles of geochem-istry. John Wiley & Sons, 392p
23 Whalen, J.B. and Chappell, B.W., 1988, Opaque mineralogyand mafic mineral chemistry of I- and S-type granites ofthe Lachlan fold belt, southeast Australia. Amer. Mineral. 73, 281-296
24 윤현수, 김선억, 1990, 문경 남부일대에 분포하는 백악기화강암류의 암석학 및 암석화학. 광산지질, 23, 343-352
25 Hine, I.S., Williams, I.S., Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J.R.,1978, Contrasts between I- and S-type granitoids of theKosciusko batholith. J. Geol. Soc. Aust. 25, 219-234
26 Jwa, Y. J., 2002, Geochemistry of Cretaceous granites inSouth Korea: The implications for tectonically controlledgranitic magmatism. In Mesozoic sedimentation, igneousactivity and mineralization in South Korea (ed. Jin, etal.), Geology of Korea, KIGAM, 1, 157-166
27 Camichael, I.S.E., Turner, F.J. and Verhoogen, J., 1974,Igneous petrology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., 664p
28 Clark, D.A., 1999, Magnetic petrology of igneous intru-sions: implication for exploration and magnetic interpreta-tion. Explor. Geophy., 30, 5-26
29 김선억, 윤현수, 김윤규, 박용순, 박덕원, 김영범, 이춘오, 이병대, 이병태, 김경수, 김철주, 1988, 석재자원 조사연구(3). KR-88-2C, 한국동력자원연구소