1 |
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological science, 12(5), 391-396.
DOI
|
2 |
Lieder, F., Griffiths, T. L., Huys, Q. J., & Goodman, N. D. (2018). The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(1), 322-349.
DOI
|
3 |
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). Numeric judgments under uncertainty: The role of knowledge in anchoring. Journal of experimental social psychology, 36(5), 495-518.
DOI
|
4 |
Bahnik, S., & Strack, F. (2016). Overlap of accessible information undermines the anchoring effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1).
|
5 |
Bokati, L., Kreinovich, V., & Le, C. V. (2021, January). How to Explain the Anchoring Formula in Behavioral Economics. In International Econometric Conference of Vietnam (pp. 28-34). Springer, Cham.
|
6 |
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 79(2), 115-153.
DOI
|
7 |
Englich, B. (2008). When knowledge matters-differential effects of available knowledge in standard and basic anchoring tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 896-904.
DOI
|
8 |
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 199-212.
DOI
|
9 |
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2005). The last word in court-A hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior, 29(6), 705-722.
DOI
|
10 |
Caputo, A. (2014). Relevant information, personality traits and anchoring effect. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 13(1), 62-76.
DOI
|
11 |
Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(11), 1161-1166.
DOI
|
12 |
Markovits, H., Thompson, V. A., & Brisson, J. (2015). Metacognition and abstract reasoning. Memory & cognition, 43(4), 681-693.
DOI
|
13 |
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. European review of social psychology, 10(1), 135-167.
DOI
|
14 |
Mussweiler, T., Englich, B., & Strack, F. (2012). Anchoring effect. In Cognitive illusions (pp. 195-212). Psychology Press.
|
15 |
Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoringand-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 39(1), 84-97.
DOI
|
16 |
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(5), 847.
DOI
|
17 |
Shynkaruk, J. M., & Thompson, V. A. (2006). Confidence and accuracy in deductive reasoning. Memory & cognition, 34(3), 619-632.
DOI
|
18 |
Smith, A. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Bruchmann, K. (2013). Knowledge matters: Anchoring effects are moderated by knowledge level. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 97-108.
DOI
|
19 |
Smith, A. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2011). Biased calculations: Numeric anchors influence answers to math equations. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), 139.
|
20 |
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, 10(2), 135-146.
DOI
|
21 |
Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 73(3), 437.
DOI
|
22 |
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
DOI
|
23 |
Englich, B., Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 188-200.
DOI
|
24 |
Yang, C., Sun, B., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 46(3), 384-397.
DOI
|
25 |
Wegener, T., Petty, E., Blankenship, L., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010). Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 5-16.
DOI
|
26 |
Wegener, T., Petty, E., Detweiler-Bedell, T., & Jarvis, G. (2001). Implications of attitude change theories for numerical anchoring: Anchor plausibility and the limits of anchor effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 62-69.
DOI
|
27 |
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Matching versus mismatching attitude functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 227-240.
DOI
|
28 |
Smith, A. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2015). Resisting anchoring effects: The roles of metric and mapping knowledge. Memory & cognition, 43(7), 1071-1084.
DOI
|
29 |
Thorsteinson, T. J. (2011). Initiating Salary Discussions With an Extreme Request: Anchoring Effects on Initial Salary Offers 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1774-1792.
DOI
|
30 |
Englich, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the courtroom 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 31(7), 1535-1551.
DOI
|
31 |
Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high-and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(1), 5.
DOI
|
32 |
Blankenship, K. L., Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Detweiler-Bedell, B., & Macy, C. L. (2008). Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1465-1476.
DOI
|
33 |
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(4), 223-242.
DOI
|