1 |
Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2007). High perceptual load makes everybody equal. Psychological Science, 18, 377-381.
DOI
|
2 |
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
DOI
|
3 |
Lavie, M., & de Fockert, J. W. (2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 202-212.
DOI
|
4 |
Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory -Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23, 1316-1340.
DOI
|
5 |
Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1038-1052.
DOI
|
6 |
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 339-354.
DOI
|
7 |
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
DOI
|
8 |
Park, C. (2012). Review of Negative/Positive Repetition Effect in Visual Information Processing. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 24, 191-209.
DOI
|
9 |
Park, C. (2013). The Influence of Unattended Distractors on the Identification of Targets. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 24, 365-391.
DOI
|
10 |
Tsal, Y., & Benoni, H. (2010). Diluting the burden of load: Perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1645-1656.
DOI
|
11 |
Weissman, D. H., Drake, B., Colella, K., & Samuel, D. (2018). Perceptual load is not always a crucial determinant of early versus late selection. Acta Psychologica, 185, 125-135.
DOI
|
12 |
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
|
13 |
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
DOI
|
14 |
Park, C. (2008). The influence of uniform connectedness and report task type on the perception of brief displays. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 39-54.
|
15 |
Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
DOI
|
16 |
Cosman, J. D., Mordkoff, J. T., & Vecera, S. P. (2016). Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 2077-2083.
DOI
|
17 |
Aschenbrenner, Balota, Weigand, Scaltritti, & Besner (2017). The first letter position effect in visual word recognition: The role of spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 700-718.
DOI
|
18 |
Benoni, H., & Tsal, Y. (2013). Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 522.
DOI
|
19 |
Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
DOI
|
20 |
Egeth, H. E., & Santee, J. E. (1981). Conceptual and perceptual components of inter letter inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 506-517.
DOI
|
21 |
Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
DOI
|
22 |
Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.
DOI
|
23 |
Kwak, H. W., Kim, J. O., & Park, M. K. (1993). Time courses of the negative and positive repetition effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 814-829.
DOI
|
24 |
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9, 75-82.
DOI
|
25 |
Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current directions in psychological science, 19, 143-148.
DOI
|
26 |
Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8, 395-396.
DOI
|
27 |
Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 73-83.
DOI
|
28 |
Burnham, B. R. (2010). Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search. Acta Psychologica, 135, 20-28.
DOI
|
29 |
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effect of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
DOI
|