1 |
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological review, 96(3), 433-458.
DOI
|
2 |
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483-502.
DOI
|
3 |
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202-238.
DOI
|
4 |
Wolfe, J. M., Cave K. R., Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419-433.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495-501.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection in visual search, Vision research, 37, 617-631.
DOI
|
7 |
Scialfa, C. T., Joffe, K. M. (1998). Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity, Perception & Psychophysics, 60(6), 1067-1082.
DOI
|
8 |
Williams, D. E., Reingold, E. M. (2001). Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 476-488.
DOI
|
9 |
Chun, M. M., Jiang, Y. (1998). contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention, Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
DOI
|
10 |
Chun, M. M., Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation, Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
DOI
|
11 |
Henderson, J. M., Weeks Jr, P. A., Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210-228.
DOI
|
12 |
Neider, M. B., Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search, Vision Research, 46(5), 614-621.
DOI
|
13 |
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and shape, Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
DOI
|
14 |
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65-70.
DOI
|
15 |
Chen, X., Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance, Vision Research, 46(24), 4118-4133.
DOI
|
16 |
Yang, H., Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets, Vision Research, 49(16), 2095-2103.
DOI
|
17 |
Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2012). A familiar-size Stroop effect: real-world size is an automatic property of object representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 561-569.
DOI
|
18 |
Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2002). Is an ant larger than a lion?. Acta Psychologica, 111(1), 141-154.
DOI
|
19 |
Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2011). Canonical visual size for real-world objects. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 37(1), 23-37.
DOI
|
20 |
Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2012). A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron, 74(6), 1114-1124.
DOI
|
21 |
Gregory, R. L. (1997). Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1358), 1121-1127.
DOI
|