1 |
Reber R, Schwarz N , & Winkielm an P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthet ic pleasure: is beaut y in t he perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
DOI
|
2 |
M onahan JL, M urphy ST , & Zajonc RB. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science, 11, 462-466.
DOI
|
3 |
Liberman N , Trope Y , & Stephan E (2007) Psychological distance. Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, eds Higgins ET & Kruglanski A (Guilford Press, New York), 2nd Ed.
|
4 |
Liberman N & T rope Y . (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Trope Y & Liberm an N . (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological dist ance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Trope Y & Liberman N . (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Eyal T , Liberman N , & Trope Y . (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204-1209.
DOI
|
8 |
Fujit a K , Trope Y , Liberm an N , & Levin-Sagi M . (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351-367.
DOI
|
9 |
Trope Y & Liberman N . (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889.
DOI
|
10 |
Freit as A L, Langsam K L, Clark S, & Moeller SJ. (2008). Seeing oneself in one's choice: Construal level and self-pertinence of elect oral and consum er decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1174-1179.
DOI
|
11 |
Pronin E, Olivola CY , & K ennedy K A . (2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: psychological distance and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 224-236.
DOI
|
12 |
McCarthy RJ & Sk owronsk i JJ. (2011). You're getting warmer: Level of construal affects the impact of central traits on impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1304-1307.
DOI
|
13 |
Bar-Anan Y , Liberman N , Trope Y , & Algom D . (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Strooptask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610-622.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
W hittlesea BW & Williams LD . (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165.
DOI
|
15 |
Bar-Anan Y , Liberman N , & Trope Y . (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an im plicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609-622.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Forster J. (2009). Cognitive consequences of novelty and fam iliarity: H ow m ere exposure influences level of construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 444-447.
DOI
|
17 |
Whittlesea BW . (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-1253.
DOI
|
18 |
A lter A L & Oppenheimer D M . (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161-167.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Brainard D H . (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
DOI
|
20 |
한덕웅 & 강혜자. (2000). 한국어 정서 용어들의 적절성과 경험 빈도. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 19, 63-99.
|
21 |
박인조 & 민경환. (2005). 한국어 감정단어의 목록 작성과 차원 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19, 109-129.
|
22 |
Saffran JR, Aslin RN , & Newport EL. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants [see comments]. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
DOI
|
23 |
A lter A L & Oppenheimer D M . (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235.
DOI
|
24 |
Firestone C. (2013). How "Paternalistic" Is Spatial Perception? Why Wearing a Heavy Back pack Doesn't- and Couldn't-Make Hills Look Steeper. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 455-473.
DOI
|
25 |
Witt JK , Link enauger SA , Bak dash JZ, & Proffitt D R. (2008). Putting to a bigger hole: golf performance relates to perceived size. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 581-585.
DOI
|
26 |
Lewin K (1951) Field theory in social science (Harper, New York ).
|
27 |
Proffitt D R. (2013). An Embodied A pproach to Perception: By What Units Are Visual Perceptions Scaled? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 474-483.
DOI
|
28 |
Proffitt D R, Stefanucci J, Banton T , & Epstein W . (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 14, 106-112.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Schnall S, Z adra JR, & Proffitt D R. (2010). Direct evidence for the economy of action: Glucose and the perception of geographical slant. Perception, 39, 464-482.
DOI
|
30 |
Witt JK & Proffitt D R. (2005). See the ball, hit the ball. Psychological Science, 16, 937-938.
DOI
|
31 |
Canal-Bruland R, Pijpers JR, & Oudejans RR. (2010). T he influence of anxiety on action-specific perception. Anxiety Stress Coping, 23, 353-361.
DOI
|
32 |
Proffitt D R. (2006). Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110-122.
DOI
|
33 |
Witt JK . (2011). A ction's Effect on Perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 201-206.
DOI
|
34 |
Forster J, Liberman N , & Shapira O . (2009). Preparing for novel versus familiar events: shifts in global and local processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 383-399.
|
35 |
Navon D . (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
|
36 |
Wink ielman P & Cacioppo JT . (2001). M ind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000.
DOI
|
37 |
Bornstein RF & D 'A gostino PR. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545-552.
DOI
|