Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12925/jkocs.2003.20.3.11

Study of Structure Change by Temperature Effect in Spin Label of Myosin Head  

Kim, Duck-Sool (Department of Computer Engineering, Tongmyong University of Information Technology)
Park, Keun-Ho (Department of Chemical Engineering, Changwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Applied Science and Technology / v.20, no.3, 2003 , pp. 268-273 More about this Journal
Abstract
IASL(iodo acetamide spin label) and MSL(maleimide spin label) disordered the orderly helix arrangement of myosin in the rest state of spin level. Especially the effect of IASL was great. The muscle was isometrically tetanized with three trains of 3ms pulses every 50ms between $5^{\circ}C$ with $25^{\circ}C$. Equatorial reflection change inferred that myosin head was moved to the vicinity of actin filament by spin level. The intensity change of $143{\AA}$ and $72{\AA}$ could offer information of the mass projection of population of myosin head along the filament axis. The slope of intensity profile of the mass projection of $143{\AA}$ and reflection of IASL is appeared and that of MSL is appeared sharply. The decrease of $215{\AA}$ reflection intensity the periodical character of $143{\AA}$ reflection by spin label. The raise of MSL actin reflection at $51{\AA}$ and $59{\AA}$ in the actin reflection change refers that the shifted myosin head binds a certain actin or changes an actin structure by spin label effect. Because iodo acetamide has a tendency to decease the actin reflection, actin dose not bind myosin head. From this result, we can conclude that IASL and MSL are spin labeled on SH of myosin head and disordered the helix arrangement of actin.
Keywords
myosin head; spin label; reflection;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. E. Huxley, Science, 164, 1356 (1969)   DOI
2 H. E. Huxley, A. R. Farqi and M. Brown J. Mol. Biol., 30, 384 (1967)
3 H. E. Huxley, A. R. Farqi, M. Kress, J.Bordas, and M. H. J. Koch, J. Mol. Biol.,158, 637 (1985)   DOI
4 J. J. Harford and J. M. Squire, Biophys.J., 63, 387 (1982)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 P. R. Fajer, L. H. Bennett, C.Polnaszek, E. A. Fajer, and D.Thomas, J. Magn. Reson., 88,(1990a)
6 H. Tanaka, T. Kobayashi, Y. Amemiya,and K. Wakabayashi, Biophys. Chem,25, 161 (1986)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 S. Takemori, M. Yamaguchi, and H. Yagi,J. Biochemistry. 117, 603 (2002)
8 K. Wakabayashi, H. Tanaka, T.Kobayashi, T. Hamanaka, S. Nishizawa,H. Sugi, and T. Mitsui, Biophys. J. 49,581 (1986)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 K. Hirose, T. D. Lenart, J. M. Murray,C. Franzini-Armstrong, and Y. E.Goldman, Biophys. J.. 65, 397 (1993)   DOI   ScienceOn
10 I. Matsubara and N. Yagi, J. PhysioI.,361, 151 (1985)
11 K. Wakabayashi and Y. Amemiya,Handbook on Synchrotron Radiation, Vol.4, pp. 597-678, North Holland,Amsterdam, (1991)
12 S. Malinchik and L. C. Yu, Biophys. J.,68, 2023 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
13 H. E. Huxley, R. M. Simmons, A. R.Farqi, and M. Kress, J. Bordas, Mot.BioI, 169, 469 (1982)
14 Y. Amemiya, K. Wakabayashi, T.Hamanaka, T. Wakabayashi, T.Matsushta and H. Hashizume, NucI.Instrum. Methods, 208, 471 (1983)   DOI
15 H. Iwamoto, T. Kobayashi, Y. Amemiya,and K. Wakabayashi, Biophys. J., 68,227(1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
16 O. Roopnarine, , K. Hideg, and D. D.Thomas, Biophys. J., 64, 1986 (1993)
17 G. R. S. Naylor and R. J. Podolsky, Proc.NatI. Aoad. Sci. USA, 78, 5559 (1981)   DOI   ScienceOn
18 J. J. Matta, and D. D. Thomas, Biophys.J.61, 295 (1992)