Browse > Article

Uncertainty Evaluation of Ammonia Determination in Burley Tobacco  

Lee Jeong-Min (KT&G Central Research Institute)
Lee Kyoung-Ku (KT&G Central Research Institute)
Han Sang-Bin (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Tobacco Science / v.27, no.1, 2005 , pp. 107-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
The uncertainty of measurement in quantitative analysis of ammonia by continuous-flow analysis method was evaluated following internationally accepted guidelines. The sources of uncertainty associated with the analysis of ammonia were the weighing of sample, the preparation of extracting solution, the addition of extracting solution into the sample, the reproducibility of analysis and the determination of water content in tobacco, etc. In calculating uncertainties, Type A of uncertainty was evaluated by the statistical analysis of a series of observation, and Type B by the information based on supplier's catalogue and/or certificated of calibration. It was shown that the main source of uncertainty was caused by the volume measurement of 1 mL and 2 mL, the purity of ammonia reference material in the preparation of standard solution, the reproducibility of analysis and the determination of water content of tobacco. The uncertainty in the addition of extraction solution, the sample weighing, the volume measurement of 50 mL and 100 mL, and the calibration curve of standard solution contributed relatively little to the overall uncertainty. The expanded uncertainty of ammonia determination in burley tobacco at $95\%$ level of confidence was $0.00997\%$.
Keywords
uncertainty; ammonia; auto-analyzer;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Eurachem (1995) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurements. 1st ed. pp.1-86. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London
2 ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty of measurement, Geneva, Switzerland
3 Maroto, A., Boque, R., Riu, J. and Rius, F.X. (1999) Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process. Analytica Chimia Acta 391: 173-185   DOI   ScienceOn
4 NAMAS (1995) The Expression of uncertainty and confidence in measurement for calibrations, NIS3003. 8th ed., NAMAS, NPL, Teddington
5 EAL-R2 (1997) Expression of uncertainty of measurement, European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories
6 ILAC (1994) Uncertainty of measurement in testing: Examples of estimation of uncertainty of measurement in tests based on the ISO/TAG4 Approach. Committe Papers Supplement, Appendix 2.5, Annex H. ILAC, Hong Kong
7 CORESTA (2004) Tobacco-Determination of ammonia-continuous flow analysis method. CORESTA Routine Analytical Chemistry Sub-Group, DRAFT 1, April 2004
8 Taylor, B.N. and Kuyatt, C.E. (1994) Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD
9 ISO 6488 (1981) Tobacco-Determination of water content. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland
10 Meinroth, G., Ekberg, C., Landgren, A. and Liljenzin, J.O. (2000) Assessment of uncertainty in parameter evaluation and prediction. Talanta 51: 231-246
11 Maroto, A., Boque, R., Riu, J. and Rius, F.X. (1999) Evaluating uncertainty in routine analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 18: 577-584   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ricardo, J.N., Silva, B., Camoes, M.F. and Barros, J.S. (1999) Validation and quality control schemes based on the expression of results with uncertainty. Analytica Chimica Acta 393: 167-175   DOI   ScienceOn