Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2022.41.2.10

Effect of Rice Straw on Methane Production Potential of Cow Manure  

Park, So Yun (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Jang, Jeong A (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Zhao, Xin (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University)
Hong, Jin-Kyung (Department of Environmental and Energy Engineering, College of Science and Technology, Yonsei University)
Jho, Eun Hea (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture / v.41, no.2, 2022 , pp. 71-81 More about this Journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Animal manures are one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gases and improper manage-ment of animal wastes contributes to the increasing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Con-verting greenhouse gases generated from animal manures to energy is one way of contributing to the net-zero carbon emissions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The potential for methane production from cow manure (CM) was studied by measuring the methane yield using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. In particular, the effect of co-digestion using rice straw (RM) on the methane production was studied. The methane yields from the co-digestion of CM and RS were statistically similar to that from the mono-digestion of CM or RS. But there was a synergy effect at the CM:RS ratio of 1:2 and 1:1. This can be attributed to the increased C/N ratio. The changed microbial community structure with the addition of substrates (CM, RS) probably led to the increase in the methane produc-tion. CONCLUSION(S): The methane production potential of the particular CM used in this study was not improved by the addition of RS as a co-substrate. The addition of substrates to the anaerobic sludge promoted the increase in the microbial species having synergetic relationship with methano-gens, and this can partially explain the increase in the methane production with the addition of substrates. Overall, there are needs for further studies to improve the methane yield from CM.
Keywords
Cattle manure; Co-digestion; Methane production; Rice straw;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tsapekos P, Kougias P, Alvarado-Morales M, Kovalovszki A, Corbiere M, Angelidaki I (2018) Energy recovery from wastewater microalgae through anaerobic digestion process: Methane potential, continuous reactor operation and modelling aspects. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 139, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.08.004.   DOI
2 Li Y, Zhao J, Krooneman J, Euverink GJW (2021) Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure: Laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential. Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142940.   DOI
3 Jeong K-H, Kim JK, Lee D-j, Cho W-M, Ravindran B, Kwag J-H (2016) Evaluation of solidified fuel value of dairy cattle manure digested by semi-dry anaerobic digestion method. Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association, 24, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.17137/korrae.2016.24.4.95.   DOI
4 Angelidaki I, Ahring BK (2000) Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Water Science and Technology, 41, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0071.   DOI
5 Budde J, Heiermann M, Quinones TS, Plochl M (2014) Effects of thermobarical pretreatment of cattle waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Waste Management, 34, 522-529. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.023.   DOI
6 Sutaryo S, Ward AJ, Moller HB (2014) The effect of mixed-enzyme addition in anaerobic digestion on methane yield of dairy cattle manure. Environmental Technology, 35, 2476-2482. http://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.911356.   DOI
7 Tufaner F, Avsar Y (2016) Effects of co-substrate on biogas production from cattle manure: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 2303-2312. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1069-1.   DOI
8 Li D, Liu S, Mi L, Li Z, Yuan Y, Yan Z, Liu X (2015) Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure. Bioresource Technology, 189, 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033.   DOI
9 Yang Q, Wang H, Larson R, Runge TM (2017) Comparative study of chemical pretreatments of dairy manure for enhanced biomethane production. BioResources, 12, 7363-7375. http://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.7363-7375.   DOI
10 Muhayodin F, Fritze A, Rotter VS (2021) Mass balance of c, nutrients, and mineralization of nitrogen during anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw with cow manure. Sustainability, 13, 11568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111568.   DOI
11 Xavier CA, Moset V, Wahid R, Moller HB (2015) The efficiency of shredded and briquetted wheat straw in anaerobic co-digestion with dairy cattle manure. Biosystems Engineering, 139, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.07.008.   DOI
12 Risberg K, Sun L, Leven L, Horn SJ, Schnurer A (2013) Biogas production from wheat straw and manure-impact of pretreatment and process operating parameters. Bioresource Technology, 149, 232-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.054.   DOI
13 Li C, Stromberg S, Liu G, Nges IA, Liu J (2017) Assessment of regional biomass as co-substrate in the anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: Impact of co-digestion with chicken processing waste, seagrass and miscanthus. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 118, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.11.008.   DOI
14 Shanmugam P, Horan N (2009) Optimising the biogas production from leather fleshing waste by co-digestion with msw. Bioresource Technology, 100, 4117-4120. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.052.   DOI
15 Su L, Sun X, Liu C, Ji R, Zhen G, Chen M, Zhang L (2020) Thermophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn straw, cattle manure, and vegetable waste: Effect of temperature, total solid content, and c/n ratio. Archaea, 2020. 8841490. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8841490.   DOI
16 De Caceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M (2010) Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos, 119, 1674-1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x.   DOI
17 Moset V, Fontaine D, Moller HB (2017) Co-digestion of cattle manure and grass harvested with different technologies. Effect on methane yield, digestate composition and energy balance. Energy, 141, 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.068.   DOI
18 Kamusoko R, Jingura RM, Parawira W, Sanyika WT (2019) Comparison of pretreatment methods that enhance biomethane production from crop residues-a systematic review. Biofuel Research Journal, 6, 1080. http://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2019.6.4.4.   DOI
19 Jugal Sukhesh M, Venkateswara Rao P (2019) Synergistic effect in anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and dairy manure-a batch kinetic study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 41, 2145-2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1550536.   DOI
20 Hassan M, Masud SFB, Anwar M, Zhao C, Singh RS, Mehryar E (2022) Methane enhancement by the co-digestion of thermochemical alkali solubilized rice husk and cow manure: Lignocellulosics decomposition perspectives. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02310-w.   DOI
21 Vivekanand V, Mulat DG, Eijsink VG, Horn SJ (2018) Synergistic effects of anaerobic co-digestion of whey, manure and fish ensilage. Bioresource Technology, 249, 35-41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.169.   DOI
22 Kunatsa T, Xia X (2022) A review on anaerobic digestion with focus on the role of biomass co-digestion, modelling and optimisation on biogas production and enhancement. Bioresource Technology, 344, 126311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126311.   DOI
23 Cho J, Kim H, Oh D (2014) Characteristics for co--digestion of food waste and night soil using bmp test. Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society, 15, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.14481/jkges.2014.15.9.13.   DOI
24 Li R, Chen S, Li X, Saifullah Lar J, He Y, Zhu B (2009) Anaerobic codigestion of kitchen waste with cattle manure for biogas production. Energy & Fuels, 23, 2225-2228. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8008772.   DOI
25 Lee C, Zhao X, Kim JY (2022) Effect of mixing ratio on sewage sludge and septage co-digestion. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01372-2.   DOI
26 Bovio-Winkler P, Cabezas A, Etchebehere C (2021) Database mining to unravel the ecology of the phylum chloroflexi in methanogenic full scale bioreactors. Frontiers in Microbiology, 3608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.603234.   DOI
27 Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, Mahmood T, Dawson L (2011) The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Management, 31, 1737-1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021.   DOI
28 Ma G, Ndegwa P, Harrison JH, Chen Y (2020) Methane yields during anaerobic co-digestion of animal manure with other feedstocks: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138224.   DOI
29 Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, Huttley GA, Caporaso JG (2018) Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with qiime 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome, 6, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z.   DOI
30 Mei R, Nobu MK, Narihiro T, Liu W-T (2020) Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses revealed uncultured bacteroidales populations as the dominant proteolytic amino acid degraders in anaerobic digesters. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.593006.   DOI
31 Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos J, Guwy A, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, Van Lier J (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (bmp) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: A proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Science and Technology, 59, 927-934. http://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040.   DOI
32 Kim MS, Koo N, Kim, JG (2020) A comparative study on ammonia emission inventory in livestock manure compost application through a foreign case study. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology, 38(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2020.38.1.071.   DOI
33 Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Guiza M, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals S (2014) A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, 412-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039.   DOI
34 Amir A, McDonald D, Navas-Molina JA, Kopylova E, Morton JT, Zech Xu Z, Kightley EP, Thompson LR, Hyde ER et al. (2017) Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. MSystems, 2, e00191-00116. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00191-16.   DOI
35 Wang K, Yun S, Ke T, An J, Abbas Y, Liu X, Zou M, Liu L, Liu J (2022) Use of bag-filter gas dust in anaerobic digestion of cattle manure for boosting the methane yield and digestate utilization. Bioresource Technology, 126729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126729.   DOI
36 Li Y, Achinas S, Zhao J, Geurkink B, Krooneman J, Euverink GJW (2020) Co-digestion of cow and sheep manure: Performance evaluation and relative microbial activity. Renewable Energy, 153, 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.041.   DOI
37 Kafle GK, Kim SH (2013) Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation. Applied Energy, 103, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018.   DOI
38 Zeynali R, Khojastehpour M, Ebrahimi-Nik M (2017) Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment on biogas yield and specific energy in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wholesale market wastes. Sustainable Environment Research, 27, 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2017.07.001.   DOI
39 Yuan Y, Bian A, Zhang L, Chen Z, Zhou F, Ye F, Jin T, Pan M, Chen Tet al. (2019) Thermal-alkali and enzymes for efficient biomethane production from co-digestion of corn straw and cattle manure. BioResources, 14, 5422-5437. http://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.3.5422-5437.   DOI
40 APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 1998, American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington DC, USA.
41 Buswell A, Mueller H (1952) Mechanism of methane fermentation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 44, 550-552. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50507a033.   DOI
42 Bah H, Zhang W, Wu S, Qi D, Kizito S, Dong R (2014) Evaluation of batch anaerobic co-digestion of palm pressed fiber and cattle manure under mesophilic conditions. Waste Management, 34, 1984-1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.015.   DOI
43 Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M et al. (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using qiime 2. Nature Biotechnology, 37, 852-857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.   DOI
44 Cheon Y (2022) Review of global carbon neutral strategies and technologies. Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, 59, 99-112. https://doi.org/10.32390/ksmer.2022.59.1.099.   DOI
45 Caceres MD, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90, 3566-3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1.   DOI
46 Gunaseelan VN (1997) Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 13, 83-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00020-2.   DOI
47 Adekunle KF, Okolie JA (2015) A review of biochemical process of anaerobic digestion. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 6, 205. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.63020.   DOI
48 Kambara H, Dinh HT, Matsushita S, Aoi Y, Kindaichi T, Ozaki N, Ohashi A (2022) New microbial electrosynthesis system for methane production from carbon dioxide coupled with oxidation of sulfide to sulfate. Journal of Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.02.029.   DOI
49 Tang F, Tian J, Zhu N, Lin Y, Zheng H, Xu Z, Liu W (2022) Dry anaerobic digestion of ammoniated straw: Performance and microbial characteristics. Bioresource Technology, 126952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126952.   DOI
50 Hao L, Michaelsen TY, Singleton CM, Dottorini G, Kirkegaard RH, Albertsen M, Nielsen PH, Dueholm MS (2020) Novel syntrophic bacteria in full-scale anaerobic digesters revealed by genome-centric metatranscriptomics. The ISME Journal, 14, 906-918. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0571-0.   DOI
51 Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glockner FO (2013) Evaluation of general 16s ribosomal rna gene pcr primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 41, e1-e1. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808.   DOI
52 Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85, 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7.   DOI