Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2022.41.1.01

Evaluation of Residues of Fungicide Azoxystrobin in Radish based on Plant Back Interval Experiment  

Yoon, Ji Hyun (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Lim, Da Jung (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Seon Wook (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Kim, In Seon (Department of Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture / v.41, no.1, 2022 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pesticide residue in rotational crop is one of the main concerns to agricultural products because it has the potentiality of violating positive list system (PLS). Thus, the crops used for the rotational cultivation should be considered the pesticide residue patterns to meet the PLS guideline. In this study, we evaluated the residue patterns of fungicide azoxystrobin in radish based on plant back interval (PBI) experiment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Azoxystrobin was treated onto greenhouse soil at 217 g a.i./10a in two different regions. Radishes were sown onto the soil 30 and 60 days after azoxystrobin treatment. The soil and plant samples were subjected to a modified QuEChERS method and LC/MS/MS analyses to determine the residues of azoxystrobin. The methods were validated to meet the guidelines of the pesticide residue analysis recommended by the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. Azoxystrobin was dissipated significantly in soil during the experimental period and found as a level less than 0.01 mg/kg in radish 30 and 60 days after treatment. Azoxystrobin residues in radish samples were lower than the maximum residue limit (MRL) for root vegetables. CONCLUSION(S): This study suggests 30 days as a PBI for rotational cultivation of radish in greenhouse soil that had been treated with azoxystrobin at a level of 217 g a.i./10a.
Keywords
Azoxystrobin; Pesticide; Positive list system; Radish; Rotational crop;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hwang K. Yoo SC, Le S, Moon JK (2018) Residue level of chlorpyrifos in lettuces grown on chlorpyrifos-treated soils. Applied Science, 8, 2343, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122343.   DOI
2 Hwang J, Zimmerman A, Kim J (2018) Bioconcentration factor-based management of soil pesticide residues: Endosulfan uptake by carrot and potato plants. Science and Total Environment, 627, 514-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.208.   DOI
3 European Food Safety Authority (2012) Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for azoxystrobin in lettuce, spinach, celery, cardoon, spices and rhubarb. EFSA Journal, 10, 2991, 27 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2991.   DOI
4 Gajbhiye VT, Gupta S, Mukherjee I, Singh SB, Singh N, Dureja P, Kumar Y (2011) Persistence of azoxystrobin in/on grapes and soil in different grapes growing areas of India. Bulletin of Environmental Toxicology and Contamination, 86, 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-0170-2.   DOI
5 European Food Safety Authority (2008) Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on setting of an import tolerance for azoxystrobin in passion fruits. EFSA Journal, 209, 25. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.209r.   DOI
6 OECD (2016) Draft guidance document on residues in rotational crops. OECD Environ. Health Safety Public, 1, 1-46. Available at https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/OECDRotationalCropGuidelineDraftVersion_19%July2016..AEpdf.
7 Adetutu EM, Ball AS, Osborn AM (2008) Azoxystrobin and soil interactions: degradation and impact on soil bacterial and fungal communities. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 105, 1777-1790. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03948.x.   DOI
8 Kanetis L (2007) Comparative efficacy of the new postharvest fungicides azoxystrobin, fludioxonil, and pyrimethanil for managing citrus green mold. Plant Disease, 91, 1502-1511. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-11-1502.   DOI
9 Wong FP, Wilcox WE (2001) Comparative physical modes of action of azoxystrobin, mancozeb, and metalaxyl against Plasmopara viticola (Grapevine Downy Mildew). Plant Disease, 85, 649-656. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.6.649.   DOI
10 Bertelsen JR, Neergaard ED, Smedegaard-Peterse V (2001) Fungicidal effects of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole on phyllosphere fungi, senescence and yield of winter wheat. Plant Pathology, 50, 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00545.x.   DOI
11 Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ (2003) Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. Journal of AOAC International, 86, 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412.   DOI
12 SANTE Guidance Document on Analytical Quality Control and Validation Procedures for Pesticide Analysis in Food and Feed; SANTE/12682/2019, Implemented by 01.01.2020; European Commission Directorate General for Health and Food Safety: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
13 Lim DJ, Kim SW, Kim YE, Yoon JH, Cho HJ, Shin BG, Kim HY, Kim IS (2021) Plant-back intervals of imicyafos based on its soil dissipation and plant uptake for rotational cultivation of lettuce and spinach in greenhouse. Agriculture, 11, 495, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060495.   DOI
14 Purnamaab I, Malhatac F, Jaikaewa P, Watanabea H, Noegrohatib S, Rusdiarsob B, Ahmed MT (2014) Degradation profile of azoxystrobin in Andisol soil: laboratory incubation. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 96, 1141-1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2015.1015297.   DOI
15 Dong M, Nie D, Tang H, Rao Q, Qu M, Wang W, Han L, Song W, Han Z (2015) Analysis of amicarbazone and its two metabolites in grains and soybeans by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Separation Science, 38, 2245-2252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201500265.   DOI
16 European Food Safety Authority (2009) Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of the existing MRL for azoxystrobin in cardoon. EFSA Journal, 1362, 23. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1362.   DOI
17 Anesiadis T, Karaoglanidis S, Tzavella-Klonari K (2003) Protective, curative and eradicant activity of the strobilurin fungicide azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae. Journal of Phytopathology, 151, 647-641. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00780.x.   DOI
18 Ju C, Zhang H, Yao S, Dong S, Cao D, Wang F, Fang H, Yu Y (2019) Uptake, translocation, and subcellular distribution of azoxystrobin in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 67, 6691-6699. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9600361.   DOI
19 European Food Safety Authority (2009) Reasoned opinion of EFSA prepared by the Pesticides Unit (PRAPeR) on the modification of the existing MRL for azoxystrobin in swedes. EFSA Journal, 1308, 20. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1308.   DOI
20 Ghosh RK, Singh N (2009) Effect of organic manure on sorption and degradation of azoxystrobin in soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57, 632-636. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf802716f.   DOI