Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2022.73.005

A Study on Admissibility Framework for Establishing Trust in Digital Records : Focused on the Development of the Trustworthiness Model for Public Digital Records  

Hyun, Moonsoo (부산대학교 문헌정보학과 및 이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
The Korean Journal of Archival Studies / v., no.73, 2022 , pp. 5-46 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to develop the trustworthiness model for public digital records, as an admissibility framework for establishing trust. The trustworthiness model is deemed to used to identify the qualities of the digital records in their lifecycle, including the identity that could be identified at the time of the creation, integrity obtained from the chain-of-custodial management, the evidence of relationship between business activities and records, and the technical or cognitive accessibility. Based on the analysis of the QADEP model, it was decided to develop a model that could measure the trustworthiness of public digital records in the external measurement type, which are authenticity, reliability, and usability. In line with this direction, the model expanded measurement areas and indicators of the QADEP model through the analysis of ISO 16175-1:2020, and measuring metrics was also proposed so that it could be a measuring instrument for public digital records in Korea, after analysing NAK 19-3. It would be useful to expand the model and to test the approach of the trustworthiness model for public digital records.
Keywords
trustworthiness of digital records; legal admissibility; trustworthiness model; quality requirement; electronic records management; digital records management;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 10  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cook, M. (1986). The Management of Information from Archives. Aldershot, Hants, England ; Brookfield, Vt., U.S.A: Gower, 7, 129. 재인용: Rogers, C. (2015). Virtual authenticity: Authenticity of digital records from theory to practice. Thesis of doctor of philosophy, The University of British Columbia, Canada, 3.
2 서혜란, 서은경, 이소연 (2003). 전자기록의 진본성 유지를 위한 전략. 정보관리학회지, 20(2), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2003.20.2.241   DOI
3 설문원 (2022). 법적 증거의 기록학적 의미. 한국기록관리학회지, 22(1), 219-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.1.219   DOI
4 설문원, 이해인 (2016). 전자증거개시상의 위험에 대응한 기업기록정보관리 방안. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(4), 7-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.007   DOI
5 이승억, 설문원 (2017). 전자기록관리정책의 재설계에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 52, 5-37. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.52.005   DOI
6 이젬마, 오경묵 (2020). 진본성, 신뢰성 개념을 적용한 공신력 있는 기록의 판단기준에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 20(3), 77-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.077   DOI
7 정미리, 임진희 (2016). 기업의 증거기반 설명책임을 위한 기록관리 방안: '지속가능성보고서'를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 48, 45-92. UCI : G704-001548.2016.48.001   DOI
8 Duranti, L. & Endicott-Popovsky, B. (2010). Digital records forensics: A new science and academic program for forensic readiness. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 5(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2010.1075   DOI
9 MacNeil, H. (2000). Providing grounds for trust: Developing conceptual requirements for the long-term preservation of authentic electronic records. Archivaria, 50, 52-78.
10 Rogers, C. (2016). A literature review of authenticity of records in digital systems: From 'machine-readable' to records in the cloud. Acervo - Rio de Janeiro, 29(2), 16-44
11 Jenkinson, H. (1937)(2nd ed.). A Manual of Archive Administration. 정부기록보존소 번역 (2003). 힐러리 젠킨슨의 기록관리편람. 서울: 정부기록보존소.
12 최영민 (2018). 전자기록의 증거능력 인정요건에 관한 기록학적 분석. 석사학위논문. 부산대학교 대학원 기록관리학전공.
13 Makhlouf Shabou, B. (2010). Etude sur la definition et la mesure des qualites des archives definitives issues d'une evaluation. These de philosophiae doctor, Universite de Montreal, Canada.
14 Makhlouf Shabou, B. (2015). Digital diplomatics and measurement of electronic public data qualities : What lessons should be learned? Records Management Journal, 25(1), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-01-2015-0006   DOI
15 Makhlouf Shabou, B., Tieche, J., Knafou, J. & Gaudinat, A. (2020). Algorithmic methods to explore the automation of the appraisal of structured and unstructured digital data. Records Management Journal, 30(2), 175-200. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0049   DOI
16 이젬마, 오경묵 (2021). 증거로서 신뢰할 수 있는 전자기록의 품질 확보방안 연구: 기록관리영역과 사법영역에서 다루는 기록과 증거의 품질 개념과 요건분석을 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지, 32(3), 217-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2021.32.3.217   DOI
17 박서인, 김지현 (2020). 법적 증거로서 기록의 활용을 위한 공기업 기록관리 현황분석 및 개선방안. 한국기록관리학회지, 20(2), 41-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.2.041   DOI
18 설문원 (2005). 기록의 품질 기준 분석 : 진본성, 신뢰성, 무결성, 가용성을 중심으로. 기록학연구, 11, 41-90. UCI : G704-001548.2005..11.007   DOI
19 윤은하 (2019). 법적 증거로서 기록의 속성에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 60, 89-121, 2019, https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089   DOI
20 현문수 (2018). 전자기록관리: 디지털 환경에서 전자기록을 어떻게 관리할 것인가. 한국기록관리학회 편. 기록관리의 이론과 실제, 서울: 조은글터, 353-408.
21 Jansen, A. (2015). Object-oriented diplomatics : Using archival diplomatics in software application development to support authenticity of digital records. Records Management Journal, 25(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2014-0022   DOI
22 Xie, S. L. (2011). Building foundations for digital records forensics: A comparative study of the concept of reproduction in digital records management and digital forensics. The American Archivist, 74(2), 576-599. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079051.   DOI
23 Mason, S. (2006). Proof of the authenticity of a document in electronic format introduced as evidence. ARMA International Educational Foundation. Retrieved from https://armaedfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Proof_of_authenticity_of_a_document-1.pdf
24 Makhlouf Shabou, B. (2014). Le projet QADEPs : Un outil au service de la perennisation des donnees publiques. In Hiraux, F. & Mirguet, F. eds. De la preservation a la conservation : Strategies pratiques d'archivage. Louvain-la-Neuve: demia-L'Harmattan, 87-98.