Browse > Article

Dynamics of Technology Adoption in Markets Exhibiting Network Effects  

Hur, Won-Chang (College of Business Administration, Inha University)
Publication Information
Asia pacific journal of information systems / v.20, no.1, 2010 , pp. 127-140 More about this Journal
Abstract
The benefit that a consumer derives from the use of a good often depends on the number of other consumers purchasing the same goods or other compatible items. This property, which is known as network externality, is significant in many IT related industries. Over the past few decades, network externalities have been recognized in the context of physical networks such as the telephone and railroad industries. Today, as many products are provided as a form of system that consists of compatible components, the appreciation of network externality is becoming increasingly important. Network externalities have been extensively studied among economists who have been seeking to explain new phenomena resulting from rapid advancements in ICT (Information and Communication Technology). As a result of these efforts, a new body of theories for 'New Economy' has been proposed. The theoretical bottom-line argument of such theories is that technologies subject to network effects exhibit multiple equilibriums and will finally lock into a monopoly with one standard cornering the entire market. They emphasize that such "tippiness" is a typical characteristic in such networked markets, describing that multiple incompatible technologies rarely coexist and that the switch to a single, leading standard occurs suddenly. Moreover, it is argued that this standardization process is path dependent, and the ultimate outcome is unpredictable. With incomplete information about other actors' preferences, there can be excess inertia, as consumers only moderately favor the change, and hence are themselves insufficiently motivated to start the bandwagon rolling, but would get on it once it did start to roll. This startup problem can prevent the adoption of any standard at all, even if it is preferred by everyone. Conversely, excess momentum is another possible outcome, for example, if a sponsoring firm uses low prices during early periods of diffusion. The aim of this paper is to analyze the dynamics of the adoption process in markets exhibiting network effects by focusing on two factors; switching and agent heterogeneity. Switching is an important factor that should be considered in analyzing the adoption process. An agent's switching invokes switching by other adopters, which brings about a positive feedback process that can significantly complicate the adoption process. Agent heterogeneity also plays a important role in shaping the early development of the adoption process, which has a significant impact on the later development of the process. The effects of these two factors are analyzed by developing an agent-based simulation model. ABM is a computer-based simulation methodology that can offer many advantages over traditional analytical approaches. The model is designed such that agents have diverse preferences regarding technology and are allowed to switch their previous choice. The simulation results showed that the adoption processes in a market exhibiting networks effects are significantly affected by the distribution of agents and the occurrence of switching. In particular, it is found that both weak heterogeneity and strong network effects cause agents to start to switch early and this plays a role of expediting the emergence of 'lock-in.' When network effects are strong, agents are easily affected by changes in early market shares. This causes agents to switch earlier and in turn speeds up the market's tipping. The same effect is found in the case of highly homogeneous agents. When agents are highly homogeneous, the market starts to tip toward one technology rapidly, and its choice is not always consistent with the populations' initial inclination. Increased volatility and faster lock-in increase the possibility that the market will reach an unexpected outcome. The primary contribution of this study is the elucidation of the role of parameters characterizing the market in the development of the lock-in process, and identification of conditions where such unexpected outcomes happen.
Keywords
Network Effects; Technology Adoption; Path Dependence; Lock-in; Agent-Based Model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., "Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities," The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 4, 1986, pp. 822-841.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Lee, J., Lee, J., and Lee, H., "Exploration and Exploitation in the Presence of Network Externalities," Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2003, pp. 553-570.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 David, P.A., "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY," American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, 1985, pp. 332-337.
4 Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, 1994, pp. 93-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E., "Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy," The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1994, pp. 133-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Leibenstein, H., "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand," Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 64, No. 2, 1950, pp. 183-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Arthur, W.B., Ermoliev, Y.M., and Kaniovski, Y.M., "Path Dependent Processes and the Emergence of a Macro Structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 30, 1987, pp. 294-303.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Lee, E. and Lee, J., "Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias," Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 12, 2006, pp. 1838-1848.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Arthur, W.B., "Increasing Returns and the Two Worlds of Business," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, 1996, pp. 100-109.
10 Arthur, W.B., "Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events," Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 394, 1989, pp. 116-131.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., "Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation," Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1985, pp. 70-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., "Product Introduction with Network Externalities," Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1992, pp. 55-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., "Network Externality, Competition and Compatibility," American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1985, pp. 424-440.
14 Zenobia, B., Weber, C., and Daim, T., "Artificial Markets: A Review and Assessment of a New Venue for Innovation Research," Technovation, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2009, pp. 338-350.   DOI
15 Weitzel, T., Beimbom, D., and Konig, W.A., "Unified Economic Model of Standard Diffusion: The Impact of Standardization Cost, Network Effects, and Network Topology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 489-514.   DOI
16 Johnson, N., Kotz, S., Urn Models and their Application. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY,1977.
17 Tesfatsion, L., "Agent-Based Computational Economics: Growing Economies from the Bottom Up," Artificial Life, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 55-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.G., Simulation for the Social Scientist: Second ed. Open University Press, New York, NY, 2005.
19 Roedenbeck, M.R.H. and Nothnagel, B., "Rethinking Lock-in and Locking: Adopters Facing Network Effects," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Vol. 11, No. 14, 2008, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/1/ 4.html,
20 Schelling, T.C., Micromotives and macrobehavior, W.W. Norton and Co., New York, NY,1978.
21 Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., "Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation," American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, 1986, pp. 940-955.
22 Economides, N. and Himmelberg, C., Critical Mass and Network Size with Application to the US Fax Market. Mimeo, Stem School of Business at New York University, NY, 1995.
23 Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R., Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1999.
24 Miller, J.H. and Page, S.E, Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Second ed. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 2007.
25 Liebowitz, S.J., Re-Thinking the Network Economy: The True Forces That Drive the Digital Marketplace, AMACOM, a Division of American Management Association, New York, NY, 2002.
26 Economides, N., '"The economics of networks," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1996, pp. 673-699.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Liebowitz, S.J. and Margolis, S.E., "Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History," Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1-26.