Browse > Article

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Performance and Behaviors of Participants in the Knowledge Sharing Virtual Community  

Cho, Hurn-Jin (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)
Jahng, Jung-Joo (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Asia pacific journal of information systems / v.19, no.1, 2009 , pp. 63-82 More about this Journal
Abstract
Virtual community is a social aggregation to attain some goals in an IT-supported virtual space (Lee et al., 2002). As lots of virtual communities generate robust and reliable outputs with low control and low incentive, previous researchers was interested in the questions, "why do they participate?" or "how are they controlled?". But. as Katz (1964) said, the most important part of the high-performing organization is the behaviors of members in the organization. Therefore, this research is to examine the relationship between the performance and the behaviors of participants in the virtual community. First, we propose 6 types of behaviors related to high performance in the virtual community: 'Continuous Attendance', 'Complying with the organizational value, policies, and regulations', 'Protection', 'Suggestion for the improving', 'Self-training', and 'Favorable behavior'. The six types of behaviors are extracted from the framework of Katz (1964) and Brief and Motowidlo (1986). The reason why each behavior is positively related with high-performance is that those who continuously attend have more responsibility than temporary participants do; complying with the rules of a virtual community means that they may make more reliable outcome; 'Protection' is one of the prosocial-behaviors and those who protect the community may concern the benefit of the virtual community when they participate: those who suggest some ideas for improvement may contribute to the virtual community; 'Self-training' behavior means that participants really want to have high quality in their contribution: those who have 'Favorable attitude' consider other members in the virtual community when they participate. Then, we perform an empirical analysis with the survey from participants in the Knowledge service of Naver.com, to show those behaviors are associated with the high-performance. To make the measurement for the six behaviors, we use CVR (content validity ratio) method (Lawshe, 1975), interviewing 12 experts. The dependent variable, performance of participation, is measured by 'ratio of selected answer' given by the Naver.com. We use email survey. We sent 1200 emails to randomly selected participants in the knowledge service and received 282 responses. The results of our empirical analysis show that 4('Continuous Attendance', 'Suggestion for the improving', 'Self-training', 'Favorable attitude') are positively related to the performance, but 2('Complying with the organizational value, policies, and regulations' and 'Protection') are not significant. In line with Fitzgerald (2006), we expect that participants in the virtual community may behave similarly to employees in the off-line firms for the high performance. But 2 behaviors have different results. The reason that the 'Complying with the organizational value' behavior is not sufficiently related to performance is that the motivation of participants is more related to intrinsic pleasure or altruism than external reward. Also, the 'Protection' behavior has no significant relationship with performance, which means that the high-performing participants have little concern about the problems in the community.
Keywords
Virtual Community; Performance; Behaviors; Knowledge Sharing; Knowledge Service;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Angel, H.L. and Perry, J.L., "An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, March1981
2 Brief, A.P. and Motowidlo, S.J., "Prosocial Organizational Behaviors," Academy of Management Review,Vol. 11, No. 4, 1986, pp.710-725   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Chin, W.W., Gopal, A., and Salisbury, W.D.,"Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation,"Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, 1997, pp.342-368   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dozier, J.B. and Miceli, M.P., "Potential Predictors of Whistle-blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective," Academy of Management Review, 1985, pp. 826-836
5 Franke, N. and von Hippel, E., "Satisfying Heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: The case of Apache Security Software," Res. Policy, Vol. 32, 2003, pp. 1199- 1215   DOI   ScienceOn
6 George, J.M and Bettenhausen, K., "Understanding Prosocial Behavior, Sales Performance, and Tumover: A group-level Analysis in a service context," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, 1990, pp. 698-709   DOI
7 Jim Giles, "Intemet encyclopaedias go head to head," Nature, Vol. 438, No.15, Dec. 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kogut, B. and Metiu, A., "Open-Source software development and distributed innovation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.17, No. 2, 2001, pp. 248-264   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lawler, E. and Suttle, J., "ExpectancyTheory and Job Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, V이. 9, No. 3, June1973, pp. 482-503   DOI
10 Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., and Steers, R.M., "Employee Organization Linkages," Academy Press, New York, 1982
11 Organ, D.W., "Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time," Human Performance, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1997, pp.85-97   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Von Krogh, G. and von Hippel E., The Promise of Research on Open Source Software," Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2006, pp. 975-983   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wasko, M.M. and Faraj, S.,"Why should I share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Network of Practice," MIS Quarterly, VoL 29, No. 1,2005, pp. 35-57
14 Larson,E.W. and Fukami, CV., "Relationships between Worker Behavior and Commitment to the Organization and Union," Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol.34, 1984, pp.222-226
15 Chin,W.W., "Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling " MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1998, pp. 7-16
16 Fitzgerald, B.,"The Transformation of Open Source Software," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 587-598
17 Ma, M. and Agarwal, R., "Through a glass darkly: Infomation technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities," lnformation Systems Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007, pp.42-67   DOI   ScienceOn
18 O ’Reilly, C A. and chatman, J., "Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identi-fication, and internalization on prosocial behavior," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.71, No. 3, 1986, pp. 492-499   DOI
19 Straub, D.w., "Validating Instruments in MIS Research," MIS Quarterly, VoL 13, No.2, 1989, pp. 146-169
20 Kanter, R.M., "Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian communities," American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, 1968, pp. 499-517   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Omoto, A.M. and Snyder, M., "Considerations of Community: The Context and Process of Volunteerism,'’ American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2002, pp. 846-867   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Smith, C.A., Organ, D.W, and Near, J.P.,"Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature and Antecedents," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 68, 1983, pp. 653-663   DOI
23 Bonaccorsi, A. and Rossi, C, "Why open Source Software can Succeed," Research Policy, Vol. 32, 2003, pp. 1243-1258   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M., "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for research Practice," Communications of the AIS, Vol. 4, Oct. 2000
25 Katz, D., "The Motivational Basis of Organizational Behavior," Behavioral Science, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1964, pp. 131-146   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
26 Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.b., "Impact of Organizational Citizenship Bchavior on Organizational Performance: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research," Human Performance, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1997, pp.133-151   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Fleming, L. and Waguespack, D.M , "Brokerage, Boundary Spanning and Leadership in Open Innovation Community," Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, pp. 165-180   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Stamper, C.L. and Dyne, L.v., "Work Status and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: afield study of restaurant employees," Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22, 2001,517-536   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Lawshe, C H., "A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity," Personnel Psychology, Vol. 28, 1975, pp. 563-575   DOI
30 Wispe, L.G., "Positive Forms of Social Behavior: An Overview," Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1972, pp. 1-19   DOI
31 Fornell, C and Larcker, D.F., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," J. Marketing Res., Vol.18, 1981, pp. 39-50   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Churchill, G.A., "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs," Journal of Marketing Research, V이.16,1979, pp. 64-73   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P., "The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization, "Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, 1990, pp. 1-18   DOI
34 Nunally, J.C, "Psychometric Theory," McGraw- Hill, New York, 1978
35 Lee, F., Vogel, D., and Limayem, M.,"Virtual Community Informatics: What we know and What We Need to Know",35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, pp2863-2872
36 Raymond, E.R., "The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary," Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly and Associates Inc., 1999
37 Kankanhalli, A., Tan B.C.Y., and Wei, K., "Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly Vol. 29, No. 1, 2005, pp. 113-143
38 Lee, K. and Allen, N.J., "Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Workplace Deviance: The Role of Affect and Cognitions," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2002, pp. 131-142   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Kelman,H.C , "Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three processes of attitude change," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1958, pp. 51-60   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Straub, D., Boudreau, M.C., and Gefen, D.,"Validation guidelines for IS positivist research,"Communications of the AIS, Vol. 13,2004, pp. 380-427
41 Goetz, T., "Open Source Everywhere," Wìred, Vol. 11, 2003
42 Von Hippel, E. and von Krogh, G., "Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science", Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 2,2003, pp. 209-223   DOI
43 Meyer, J.P. and Herscovitch, L., "Commitment in the workplace toward a general model," Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 11, 2001, pp. 299-326   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Krishnamurthy, S., "Cave or Community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects", First Monday, VoI. 7, No. 6, 2002
45 Mathieu, J.E. and Zajac, D.M., "A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment," Psychological bulletin, Vol. 108,1990 pp. 171-194   DOI
46 Hamner, S., "The Secret to Yahoo Answers' Success," Business 2.0 Magazine, Vol. 2, Oct. 2006
47 March, James G. and Herbert A. Simon, "Organizations," New York: Wiley, 1958
48 Finkelstein, M.A. and Penner, 1.A., "Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Integrating the Functional and Role Identity Approaches," Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2004, pp. 383-398   DOI   ScienceOn