Browse > Article

A Study on Directions for Improving the EA Maturity Model  

Kim, Sung-K. (Dept. of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University)
Choi, Won-K. (Dept. of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Information Systems Review / v.11, no.3, 2009 , pp. 147-167 More about this Journal
Abstract
Enterprise architecture is a business transformation effort. In an effort to assess an organization's EA effort and to identify complementary measures, most of countries utilize an EA maturity model. In Korea, the EA maturity model v2.1 has been used for this purpose. Since some limitations in the model were reported recently and there was much change in EA-related policy or approach with the advent of the new government, the need of modifying the current model has occurred. In this regard, our paper proposes an improved EA maturity model. The new model was developed through a series of systematic analysis such as an in-depth comparison of existing EA models, elicitation of alternatives for each decision-making element, and interviewing of experts.
Keywords
EA(Enterprise Architecture); Maturity Model; Assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 신동익, 전성현, 김학민, 이태공, "정보기술아키텍처 성숙도 모형개발의 주요명제들에 대한 고찰", 정보기술아키텍처연구, 제2권, 제2호, 2005
2 오승운, 변현진, 최봉균, "공공부문 정보기술아키텍처 수준 측정을 위한 성숙도 모델에 관한 연구", 정보기술아키텍처연구, 제2권, 제2호, 2005
3 한국정보사회진흥원, "2008년도 EA 성숙도 측정 결과보고서", 2008a
4 한국정보사회진흥원, "EA 성숙도모델 v2.1 해설서", 2008b
5 한국정보사회진흥원, "범정부 정보기술아키텍처 성숙도 모델 v2.0 해설서", 2007b
6 NASCIO, NASCIO Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model Version 1.3, 2003
7 OMB, Federal EA Program EA Assessment Framework 2.2, 2007
8 Sachs, Ira, "A Maturity Model Based on Benefits Realization", Architecture and Governance, Vol.4, No.3, 2008
9 Herzum, P, "Applying Enterprise Architecture. Executive Report", Vol.6, No.3, Cutter Consortium, 2003
10 김성근, "국가 EA 노력의 개선 방향에 대한 연구", Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 제8권, 제2권, July 2009, pp. 105-119
11 한국정보사회진흥원, "2007년도 정보기술아키텍처(ITA) 성숙도 측정 결과보고서", 2007a
12 행정자치부, "중앙행정기관 및 지방자치단체 정보기술 아키텍처 기본계획", 2006
13 IFEAD, Extended Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model, 2003
14 US ITMRA(Information Technology Management Reform Act), 1996
15 OMB, OMB EA Assessment Framework v1.0, 2004
16 OMB, Improving Agency Performance Using Information and Information Technology (Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework v3.0), 2008
17 OMB, Federal EA Program EA Assessment Framework 2.0, 2005
18 한국전산원, "범정부 정보기술아키텍처 성숙도 모델 1.0(안)", 한국전산원, 2006
19 OMB, Federal EA Program EA Assessment Framework 2.1, 2006
20 김성근, 안남규, 이진실, "정보자원관리 관련 법체계 분석: 미국과의 비교분석을 중심으로", Information Systems Review, Vol.7, No.1, 2005. 6
21 GAO, A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management(version 1.1), 2003
22 Ahern, D., A. Close, and R. Turner, CMMI Distilled : A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement, 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2008
23 DOC(Department of Commerce), Introduction-IT Architecture Capability Maturity Model, 2003
24 GAO, Enterprise Architecture Use across the Federal Government Can Be Improved, 2002
25 오승운, 박현우, "공공기관 엔터프라이즈아키텍처 성숙도 측정을 통한 정책 시사점 연구", 정보화 정책, 제15권, 제4호, 2008