Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2007.8.1.122

A Numerical Approach for Station Keeping of Geostationary Satellite Using Hybrid Propagator and Optimization Technique  

Jung, Ok-Chul (Korea Aerospace Research Institute)
No, Tae-Soo (Chonbuk National University)
Kim, Hae-Dong (Korea Aerospace Research Institute)
Kim, Eun-Kyou (Korea Aerospace Research Institute)
Publication Information
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences / v.8, no.1, 2007 , pp. 122-128 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, a method of station keeping strategy using relative orbital motion and numerical optimization technique is presented for geostationary satellite. Relative position vector with respect to an ideal geostationary orbit is generated using high precision orbit propagation, and compressed in terms of polynomial and trigonometric function. Then, this relative orbit model is combined with optimization scheme to propose a very efficient and flexible method of station keeping planning. Proper selection of objective and constraint functions for optimization can yield a variety of station keeping methods improved over the classical ones. Nonlinear simulation results have been shown to support such concept.
Keywords
Geostationary Satellite; Station Keeping; Orbit Propagation; Optimization Technique;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Oliver Montenbruck and Eberhard Gill, 'Satellite Orbits-Models, Methods, and Applications', Physics and Astronomy, 2000
2 James R. Wertz and Wiley J. Larson, 'Space Mission Analysis and Design', Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999
3 Brouwer, D., 'Solution of the Problem of Artificial Satellite Theory without Drag', The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 64, No. 1274, 1959, pp. 378-397   DOI
4 Pocha, J. J., 'An Introduction to Mission Design for Geostationary Satellites', Space Technology Library, 1983
5 T. S. No, O. C. Jung, 'Analytical Solution to Perturbed Geosynchronous Orbit', Acta Astronautica, Vol. 56, Issue 7, 2005, pp. 641-651   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Steven C. Chapra, Raymond P. Canale, 'Numerical Methods for Engineers', McGraw-Hill, 3rd edition, 1998, Chaps. 17, 19
7 Meton, R., 'Time-Explicit Representation of Relative Motion. between Elliptical Orbits', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No.4, 2000, pp. 604-610   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hoots, F. R., and France, R. G., 'Hybrid Ephemeris Compression Model', AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Paper No. 97-689, Idaho, 1997
9 John E. Prussing and Bruce A. Conway, 'Orbital Mechanics', Oxford University Press Inc., 1993
10 Clohessy, W. H., and Wiltshire, R. S., 'Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous', Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 27, No.9, 1960, pp. 653-658   DOI
11 E. M. Soop, 'Handbook of Geostationary Orbits', Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3rd edition, 1994, Chaps. 6, 7
12 Hoots, F. R., and Segerman, A. M., 'Satellite Ephemeris Representation Using Hybrid Compression', Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Texas, 2002, pp. 429-439
13 Deok- Jin Lee, Tae Soo No, Seok-Woo Choi, Sang-Ryul Lee, Hak-jung Kim, Kyle T. Alfriend, 'Precise Ephemeris Reconstruction Method Using CW Frame and Multiple Sequential Compression', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No.5, 2003, pp. 781-785   DOI   ScienceOn